土著人民与自然保护:澳大利亚生物多样性战略25年的经验教训

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Geoforum Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104518
Lydia Schofield , Elaine Stratford , Aidan Davison
{"title":"土著人民与自然保护:澳大利亚生物多样性战略25年的经验教训","authors":"Lydia Schofield ,&nbsp;Elaine Stratford ,&nbsp;Aidan Davison","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indigenous peoples play a central role in Australian national biodiversity conservation, even as they continue to resist marginalization and dispossession by the settler colonial state. Foucauldian discourse analysis of national strategic documents on biodiversity conservation from 1999 to 2024 reveals changes in government discourses, ambitions, and mechanisms for inclusion. Our analysis identifies an emergent process within biodiversity strategy of enrolling Indigenous peoples into a collective citizenry tasked with conserving biodiversity within shared and standardized epistemological and managerial frameworks. At the intersection of scientific, managerialist, capitalist and nationalist discourses, such strategy recognizes Indigenous peoples as distinct and essential custodians of nature. However, the price of such recognition is subtle reordering of Indigenous identities, knowledge systems, and relations to Country. Thus, biodiversity strategies claim to honour and continue Indigenous peoples’ historical conservation roles but simultaneously reposition Indigenous knowledges and territories as assets of the settler colonial state. In the process, these strategies reframe Indigenous knowledges as integral to a distinctively and authentically Australian national identity. This study shows how new forms of Indigenous empowerment and recognition are entangled with contemporary forms of settler colonial extraction and state-led ordering, with ambivalent results for Indigenous peoples and Country.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 104518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous peoples and nature conservation: Lessons from 25 years of Australian biodiversity strategy\",\"authors\":\"Lydia Schofield ,&nbsp;Elaine Stratford ,&nbsp;Aidan Davison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Indigenous peoples play a central role in Australian national biodiversity conservation, even as they continue to resist marginalization and dispossession by the settler colonial state. Foucauldian discourse analysis of national strategic documents on biodiversity conservation from 1999 to 2024 reveals changes in government discourses, ambitions, and mechanisms for inclusion. Our analysis identifies an emergent process within biodiversity strategy of enrolling Indigenous peoples into a collective citizenry tasked with conserving biodiversity within shared and standardized epistemological and managerial frameworks. At the intersection of scientific, managerialist, capitalist and nationalist discourses, such strategy recognizes Indigenous peoples as distinct and essential custodians of nature. However, the price of such recognition is subtle reordering of Indigenous identities, knowledge systems, and relations to Country. Thus, biodiversity strategies claim to honour and continue Indigenous peoples’ historical conservation roles but simultaneously reposition Indigenous knowledges and territories as assets of the settler colonial state. In the process, these strategies reframe Indigenous knowledges as integral to a distinctively and authentically Australian national identity. This study shows how new forms of Indigenous empowerment and recognition are entangled with contemporary forms of settler colonial extraction and state-led ordering, with ambivalent results for Indigenous peoples and Country.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525003197\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525003197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土著人民在澳大利亚国家生物多样性保护中发挥着核心作用,尽管他们继续抵制移民殖民国家的边缘化和剥夺。对1999年至2024年国家生物多样性保护战略文件的福柯话语分析揭示了政府话语、目标和包容机制的变化。我们的分析确定了生物多样性战略中的一个新兴过程,即在共享和标准化的认识论和管理框架内,将土著人民纳入一个集体公民,负责保护生物多样性。在科学、管理主义、资本主义和民族主义话语的交汇处,这种战略承认土著人民是独特和必不可少的自然守护者。然而,这种承认的代价是对土著身份、知识体系和与国家的关系进行微妙的重新排序。因此,生物多样性战略要求尊重和延续土著人民的历史保护角色,但同时将土著知识和领土重新定位为移民殖民国家的资产。在此过程中,这些战略将土著知识重新构建为独特而真实的澳大利亚民族认同的组成部分。这项研究表明,新形式的土著权力和认可是如何与当代定居者殖民榨取和国家主导的秩序纠缠在一起的,对土著人民和国家产生了矛盾的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indigenous peoples and nature conservation: Lessons from 25 years of Australian biodiversity strategy
Indigenous peoples play a central role in Australian national biodiversity conservation, even as they continue to resist marginalization and dispossession by the settler colonial state. Foucauldian discourse analysis of national strategic documents on biodiversity conservation from 1999 to 2024 reveals changes in government discourses, ambitions, and mechanisms for inclusion. Our analysis identifies an emergent process within biodiversity strategy of enrolling Indigenous peoples into a collective citizenry tasked with conserving biodiversity within shared and standardized epistemological and managerial frameworks. At the intersection of scientific, managerialist, capitalist and nationalist discourses, such strategy recognizes Indigenous peoples as distinct and essential custodians of nature. However, the price of such recognition is subtle reordering of Indigenous identities, knowledge systems, and relations to Country. Thus, biodiversity strategies claim to honour and continue Indigenous peoples’ historical conservation roles but simultaneously reposition Indigenous knowledges and territories as assets of the settler colonial state. In the process, these strategies reframe Indigenous knowledges as integral to a distinctively and authentically Australian national identity. This study shows how new forms of Indigenous empowerment and recognition are entangled with contemporary forms of settler colonial extraction and state-led ordering, with ambivalent results for Indigenous peoples and Country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书