轻度智力迟钝与重度智力迟钝的比较:八个欠发达国家的经验。

Z Stein, L Belmont, M Durkin
{"title":"轻度智力迟钝与重度智力迟钝的比较:八个欠发达国家的经验。","authors":"Z Stein,&nbsp;L Belmont,&nbsp;M Durkin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frequencies of Severe Mental Retardation (SMR) and Mild Mental Retardation (MMR) were obtained from pilot surveys of severe childhood disability in 8 less developed countries. Approximately 1,000 children aged 3 to 9 years were surveyed in each location. The surveys used a Ten Question (TQ) door-to-door interview, usually of the mother, as a screening procedure and a systematic medical and psychological assessment for the diagnosis. Diagnostic categories of SMR (IQ less than or equal to 55) and MMR (IQ greater than 55, less than or equal to 70) were assigned by well trained local psychologists, using formal and informal techniques of assessment. Contrasting frequencies and distributions for MMR compared with SMR are shown for each location. No consistent pattern for MMR versus SMR emerged, neither regarding frequency, male/female ratio, average age nor socio-economic status of household. By contrast, MMR did differ from SMR consistently regarding consanguinity of parents, the presence of associated impairments and the positive report of symptoms at interview. Also, the families of all MR children were lower in SES than comparison families. An interpretation of these findings is offered: the more severely disabled children tend to be assessed as SMR, but so do other children who might, in better circumstances, be assessed as MMR. The relevance of this interpretation is discussed, in terms of assessment and of rehabilitation, and as a guide to further epidemiologic studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":76782,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences. Supplement","volume":"44 ","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mild mental retardation and severe mental retardation compared: experiences in eight less developed countries.\",\"authors\":\"Z Stein,&nbsp;L Belmont,&nbsp;M Durkin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Frequencies of Severe Mental Retardation (SMR) and Mild Mental Retardation (MMR) were obtained from pilot surveys of severe childhood disability in 8 less developed countries. Approximately 1,000 children aged 3 to 9 years were surveyed in each location. The surveys used a Ten Question (TQ) door-to-door interview, usually of the mother, as a screening procedure and a systematic medical and psychological assessment for the diagnosis. Diagnostic categories of SMR (IQ less than or equal to 55) and MMR (IQ greater than 55, less than or equal to 70) were assigned by well trained local psychologists, using formal and informal techniques of assessment. Contrasting frequencies and distributions for MMR compared with SMR are shown for each location. No consistent pattern for MMR versus SMR emerged, neither regarding frequency, male/female ratio, average age nor socio-economic status of household. By contrast, MMR did differ from SMR consistently regarding consanguinity of parents, the presence of associated impairments and the positive report of symptoms at interview. Also, the families of all MR children were lower in SES than comparison families. An interpretation of these findings is offered: the more severely disabled children tend to be assessed as SMR, but so do other children who might, in better circumstances, be assessed as MMR. The relevance of this interpretation is discussed, in terms of assessment and of rehabilitation, and as a guide to further epidemiologic studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"89-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度智力发育迟滞(SMR)和轻度智力发育迟滞(MMR)的频率是从8个欠发达国家的重度儿童残疾试点调查中获得的。在每个地点调查了大约1 000名3至9岁的儿童。调查采用了10个问题(TQ)挨家挨户的访谈,通常是对母亲进行访谈,作为筛查程序和系统的医学和心理诊断评估。SMR(智商小于或等于55)和MMR(智商大于55,小于或等于70)的诊断类别由训练有素的当地心理学家使用正式和非正式的评估技术分配。图中显示了每个位置MMR与SMR的频率和分布对比。无论是在频率、男女比例、平均年龄还是家庭社会经济地位方面,都没有出现MMR与SMR的一致模式。相比之下,MMR与SMR在父母的血缘关系、相关缺陷的存在以及面谈时症状的阳性报告方面确实存在差异。此外,所有MR儿童家庭的社会经济地位都低于比较家庭。对这些发现的一种解释是:残疾程度越严重的儿童倾向于被评估为SMR,但在更好的情况下,其他可能被评估为MMR的儿童也是如此。从评估和康复的角度讨论了这种解释的相关性,并作为进一步流行病学研究的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mild mental retardation and severe mental retardation compared: experiences in eight less developed countries.

Frequencies of Severe Mental Retardation (SMR) and Mild Mental Retardation (MMR) were obtained from pilot surveys of severe childhood disability in 8 less developed countries. Approximately 1,000 children aged 3 to 9 years were surveyed in each location. The surveys used a Ten Question (TQ) door-to-door interview, usually of the mother, as a screening procedure and a systematic medical and psychological assessment for the diagnosis. Diagnostic categories of SMR (IQ less than or equal to 55) and MMR (IQ greater than 55, less than or equal to 70) were assigned by well trained local psychologists, using formal and informal techniques of assessment. Contrasting frequencies and distributions for MMR compared with SMR are shown for each location. No consistent pattern for MMR versus SMR emerged, neither regarding frequency, male/female ratio, average age nor socio-economic status of household. By contrast, MMR did differ from SMR consistently regarding consanguinity of parents, the presence of associated impairments and the positive report of symptoms at interview. Also, the families of all MR children were lower in SES than comparison families. An interpretation of these findings is offered: the more severely disabled children tend to be assessed as SMR, but so do other children who might, in better circumstances, be assessed as MMR. The relevance of this interpretation is discussed, in terms of assessment and of rehabilitation, and as a guide to further epidemiologic studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信