胶凝材料中的二氧化碳固存途径:机制、材料协同效应和低碳建筑的部署挑战

IF 8.3 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Firas Hilaloglu , Qudsia Kanwal , Mohammed A. Almarshoud , Sami G. Al-Ghamdi
{"title":"胶凝材料中的二氧化碳固存途径:机制、材料协同效应和低碳建筑的部署挑战","authors":"Firas Hilaloglu ,&nbsp;Qudsia Kanwal ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Almarshoud ,&nbsp;Sami G. Al-Ghamdi","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2026.200313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The cement industry accounts for approximately 8% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, underscoring the need for scalable in-material sequestration strategies. This study reviews current and emerging pathways for carbon dioxide sequestration in cement-based systems, focusing on process-based approaches such as accelerated carbonation curing and material-based strategies including mineral carbonation of alkaline byproducts like cement kiln dust and fly ash. The discussion is structured around three guiding questions: (1) how these approaches affect durability, strength development, and pore structure; (2) their economic feasibility and the role of enabling policy frameworks; and (3) optimal carbon dioxide incorporation levels that balance structural performance and environmental impact. Key findings include early-age strength gains from accelerated carbonation curing, pore densification with limited carbon dioxide diffusion, and corrosion risks in reinforced systems. Economic assessments estimate sequestration costs in the range of 25–56 United States dollars per metric ton of carbon dioxide, with particularly strong feasibility in precast concrete applications. Policy mechanisms such as carbon pricing, durability certification, and deployment subsidies are identified as critical enablers. Future opportunities include cast-in-place carbonation, low-purity carbon dioxide utilization, and life cycle-integrated curing strategies. By linking material science, engineering integration, and policy instruments, the paper outlines a comprehensive framework for advancing carbon-sequestering cement technologies in low-carbon construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 200313"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CO₂ sequestration pathways in cementitious materials: Mechanisms, material synergies, and deployment challenges for low-carbon construction\",\"authors\":\"Firas Hilaloglu ,&nbsp;Qudsia Kanwal ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Almarshoud ,&nbsp;Sami G. Al-Ghamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcradv.2026.200313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The cement industry accounts for approximately 8% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, underscoring the need for scalable in-material sequestration strategies. This study reviews current and emerging pathways for carbon dioxide sequestration in cement-based systems, focusing on process-based approaches such as accelerated carbonation curing and material-based strategies including mineral carbonation of alkaline byproducts like cement kiln dust and fly ash. The discussion is structured around three guiding questions: (1) how these approaches affect durability, strength development, and pore structure; (2) their economic feasibility and the role of enabling policy frameworks; and (3) optimal carbon dioxide incorporation levels that balance structural performance and environmental impact. Key findings include early-age strength gains from accelerated carbonation curing, pore densification with limited carbon dioxide diffusion, and corrosion risks in reinforced systems. Economic assessments estimate sequestration costs in the range of 25–56 United States dollars per metric ton of carbon dioxide, with particularly strong feasibility in precast concrete applications. Policy mechanisms such as carbon pricing, durability certification, and deployment subsidies are identified as critical enablers. Future opportunities include cast-in-place carbonation, low-purity carbon dioxide utilization, and life cycle-integrated curing strategies. By linking material science, engineering integration, and policy instruments, the paper outlines a comprehensive framework for advancing carbon-sequestering cement technologies in low-carbon construction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources, conservation & recycling advances\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources, conservation & recycling advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378926000027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378926000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水泥行业的二氧化碳排放量约占全球人为二氧化碳排放量的8%,因此需要可扩展的材料内封存策略。本研究回顾了水泥基系统中当前和新兴的二氧化碳封存途径,重点关注基于过程的方法,如加速碳化固化,以及基于材料的策略,包括水泥窑粉尘和粉煤灰等碱性副产品的矿物碳化。讨论围绕三个指导性问题进行:(1)这些方法如何影响耐久性、强度发展和孔隙结构;(2)其经济可行性和扶持政策框架的作用;(3)平衡结构性能和环境影响的最佳二氧化碳掺入水平。主要发现包括加速碳化固化的早期强度提高、有限二氧化碳扩散的孔隙致密化以及增强体系的腐蚀风险。经济评估估计每公吨二氧化碳的封存费用在25-56美元之间,预制混凝土应用的可行性特别强。碳定价、耐久性认证和部署补贴等政策机制被认为是关键的推动因素。未来的机会包括就地碳化、低纯度二氧化碳利用和生命周期一体化养护策略。通过将材料科学、工程集成和政策工具联系起来,本文概述了在低碳建筑中推进固碳水泥技术的综合框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CO₂ sequestration pathways in cementitious materials: Mechanisms, material synergies, and deployment challenges for low-carbon construction

CO₂ sequestration pathways in cementitious materials: Mechanisms, material synergies, and deployment challenges for low-carbon construction
The cement industry accounts for approximately 8% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, underscoring the need for scalable in-material sequestration strategies. This study reviews current and emerging pathways for carbon dioxide sequestration in cement-based systems, focusing on process-based approaches such as accelerated carbonation curing and material-based strategies including mineral carbonation of alkaline byproducts like cement kiln dust and fly ash. The discussion is structured around three guiding questions: (1) how these approaches affect durability, strength development, and pore structure; (2) their economic feasibility and the role of enabling policy frameworks; and (3) optimal carbon dioxide incorporation levels that balance structural performance and environmental impact. Key findings include early-age strength gains from accelerated carbonation curing, pore densification with limited carbon dioxide diffusion, and corrosion risks in reinforced systems. Economic assessments estimate sequestration costs in the range of 25–56 United States dollars per metric ton of carbon dioxide, with particularly strong feasibility in precast concrete applications. Policy mechanisms such as carbon pricing, durability certification, and deployment subsidies are identified as critical enablers. Future opportunities include cast-in-place carbonation, low-purity carbon dioxide utilization, and life cycle-integrated curing strategies. By linking material science, engineering integration, and policy instruments, the paper outlines a comprehensive framework for advancing carbon-sequestering cement technologies in low-carbon construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书