拆解居民和非居民集体流动性对入室盗窃水平的影响。

IF 3.2 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Computational urban science Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-13 DOI:10.1007/s43762-025-00234-5
Tongxin Chen, Kate Bowers, Tao Cheng
{"title":"拆解居民和非居民集体流动性对入室盗窃水平的影响。","authors":"Tongxin Chen, Kate Bowers, Tao Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s43762-025-00234-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates how the collective mobility (including movement and visiting) of residents and non-residents affects neighbourhood burglary levels. While past research has linked mobility to urban crime, this study explores how these relationships vary across population groups and social contexts at the neighbourhood level. Using mobile phone GPS data, we distinguished between residents and non-residents based on daily movement patterns. We then measured their mobility within defined spatial and temporal units. An explainable machine learning method (XGBoost and SHAP) was used to assess how mobility patterns influence burglary in London's LSOAs from 2020 to 2021. Results show that increased collective mobility is generally associated with higher burglary levels. Specifically, non-resident footfall and residents' stay-at-home time have a stronger influence than other variables like residents' travelled distance. The impact also varies across neighbourhoods and shifts during periods of COVID-19 restrictions and relaxations. These findings confirm the dynamic link between mobility and crime, highlighting the value of understanding population-specific patterns to inform more targeted policing strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72667,"journal":{"name":"Computational urban science","volume":"6 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the impacts of collective mobility of residents and non-residents on burglary levels.\",\"authors\":\"Tongxin Chen, Kate Bowers, Tao Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43762-025-00234-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates how the collective mobility (including movement and visiting) of residents and non-residents affects neighbourhood burglary levels. While past research has linked mobility to urban crime, this study explores how these relationships vary across population groups and social contexts at the neighbourhood level. Using mobile phone GPS data, we distinguished between residents and non-residents based on daily movement patterns. We then measured their mobility within defined spatial and temporal units. An explainable machine learning method (XGBoost and SHAP) was used to assess how mobility patterns influence burglary in London's LSOAs from 2020 to 2021. Results show that increased collective mobility is generally associated with higher burglary levels. Specifically, non-resident footfall and residents' stay-at-home time have a stronger influence than other variables like residents' travelled distance. The impact also varies across neighbourhoods and shifts during periods of COVID-19 restrictions and relaxations. These findings confirm the dynamic link between mobility and crime, highlighting the value of understanding population-specific patterns to inform more targeted policing strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational urban science\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12805924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational urban science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-025-00234-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational urban science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-025-00234-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了居民和非居民的集体流动性(包括移动和访问)如何影响社区入室盗窃水平。虽然过去的研究将流动性与城市犯罪联系起来,但本研究探索了这些关系在不同人口群体和社区层面的社会背景下是如何变化的。利用手机GPS数据,我们根据日常活动模式区分了居民和非居民。然后,我们在定义的空间和时间单位内测量了它们的流动性。使用可解释的机器学习方法(XGBoost和SHAP)来评估2020年至2021年伦敦lsoa的移动模式如何影响入室盗窃。结果表明,集体流动性的增加通常与更高的入室盗窃水平有关。其中,非居民客流量和居民居家时间的影响强于居民出行距离等其他变量。在COVID-19限制和放松期间,影响也因社区和班次而异。这些发现证实了流动性和犯罪之间的动态联系,强调了了解人口特定模式的价值,从而为更有针对性的警务策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disentangling the impacts of collective mobility of residents and non-residents on burglary levels.

This study investigates how the collective mobility (including movement and visiting) of residents and non-residents affects neighbourhood burglary levels. While past research has linked mobility to urban crime, this study explores how these relationships vary across population groups and social contexts at the neighbourhood level. Using mobile phone GPS data, we distinguished between residents and non-residents based on daily movement patterns. We then measured their mobility within defined spatial and temporal units. An explainable machine learning method (XGBoost and SHAP) was used to assess how mobility patterns influence burglary in London's LSOAs from 2020 to 2021. Results show that increased collective mobility is generally associated with higher burglary levels. Specifically, non-resident footfall and residents' stay-at-home time have a stronger influence than other variables like residents' travelled distance. The impact also varies across neighbourhoods and shifts during periods of COVID-19 restrictions and relaxations. These findings confirm the dynamic link between mobility and crime, highlighting the value of understanding population-specific patterns to inform more targeted policing strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书