在社区过量预防中整合预测分析的伦理挑战和机遇

IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lancet Regional Health-Americas Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101345
Bennett Allen , Adelya Urmanche , Brenda Curtis , Celia Fisher
{"title":"在社区过量预防中整合预测分析的伦理挑战和机遇","authors":"Bennett Allen ,&nbsp;Adelya Urmanche ,&nbsp;Brenda Curtis ,&nbsp;Celia Fisher","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As predictive analytics become more widely integrated into local public health responses to the United States overdose epidemic, community-based substance use service providers have begun to adopt machine learning-based predictive tools to guide the allocation and delivery of overdose prevention services. While these tools hold promise for anticipating community overdose risk and enhancing the efficiency of overdose prevention resource distribution, outreach, and education efforts, their use in community settings raises substantial ethical and practical challenges. In this Viewpoint, we examine the application of predictive analytics to community-based overdose prevention through a public health ethics lens, drawing on principles of distributive justice, transparency, community participation, and implementation readiness. We outline five key ethical considerations for developers (i.e., institutional responsibility, oversimplification of complex social realities, data and algorithmic bias, community displacement in decision making, and equity trade-offs) and corresponding practical challenges for service providers. We offer five recommendations for developers, public health authorities, and frontline organizations to overcome challenges and ensure responsible, equity-driven implementation. As data-driven approaches to overdose prevention proliferate, ethical and participatory frameworks will be essential to ensure predictive tools strengthen, rather than undermine, community trust and health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101345"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical challenges and opportunities for integrating predictive analytics in community-based overdose prevention\",\"authors\":\"Bennett Allen ,&nbsp;Adelya Urmanche ,&nbsp;Brenda Curtis ,&nbsp;Celia Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As predictive analytics become more widely integrated into local public health responses to the United States overdose epidemic, community-based substance use service providers have begun to adopt machine learning-based predictive tools to guide the allocation and delivery of overdose prevention services. While these tools hold promise for anticipating community overdose risk and enhancing the efficiency of overdose prevention resource distribution, outreach, and education efforts, their use in community settings raises substantial ethical and practical challenges. In this Viewpoint, we examine the application of predictive analytics to community-based overdose prevention through a public health ethics lens, drawing on principles of distributive justice, transparency, community participation, and implementation readiness. We outline five key ethical considerations for developers (i.e., institutional responsibility, oversimplification of complex social realities, data and algorithmic bias, community displacement in decision making, and equity trade-offs) and corresponding practical challenges for service providers. We offer five recommendations for developers, public health authorities, and frontline organizations to overcome challenges and ensure responsible, equity-driven implementation. As data-driven approaches to overdose prevention proliferate, ethical and participatory frameworks will be essential to ensure predictive tools strengthen, rather than undermine, community trust and health equity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X25003564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X25003564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着预测分析更广泛地融入美国过量流行的地方公共卫生对策,以社区为基础的物质使用服务提供者已开始采用基于机器学习的预测工具来指导过量预防服务的分配和提供。虽然这些工具有望预测社区过量风险并提高过量预防资源分配、推广和教育工作的效率,但它们在社区环境中的使用带来了重大的道德和实际挑战。在本观点中,我们通过公共卫生伦理视角,借鉴分配正义、透明度、社区参与和实施准备等原则,研究了预测分析在社区过量预防中的应用。我们概述了开发者的五个关键道德考虑因素(即机构责任、复杂社会现实的过度简化、数据和算法偏见、决策中的社区迁移和公平权衡)以及服务提供商面临的相应实际挑战。我们为开发者、公共卫生当局和一线组织提供了五条建议,以克服挑战并确保负责任、公平驱动的实施。随着数据驱动的过量预防方法的激增,道德和参与性框架对于确保预测工具加强而不是破坏社区信任和卫生公平至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical challenges and opportunities for integrating predictive analytics in community-based overdose prevention
As predictive analytics become more widely integrated into local public health responses to the United States overdose epidemic, community-based substance use service providers have begun to adopt machine learning-based predictive tools to guide the allocation and delivery of overdose prevention services. While these tools hold promise for anticipating community overdose risk and enhancing the efficiency of overdose prevention resource distribution, outreach, and education efforts, their use in community settings raises substantial ethical and practical challenges. In this Viewpoint, we examine the application of predictive analytics to community-based overdose prevention through a public health ethics lens, drawing on principles of distributive justice, transparency, community participation, and implementation readiness. We outline five key ethical considerations for developers (i.e., institutional responsibility, oversimplification of complex social realities, data and algorithmic bias, community displacement in decision making, and equity trade-offs) and corresponding practical challenges for service providers. We offer five recommendations for developers, public health authorities, and frontline organizations to overcome challenges and ensure responsible, equity-driven implementation. As data-driven approaches to overdose prevention proliferate, ethical and participatory frameworks will be essential to ensure predictive tools strengthen, rather than undermine, community trust and health equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书