{"title":"三维磁共振弹性成像与体素内非相干运动评价肝癌分级的比较研究","authors":"Weimin Liu , Sidong Xie , Wenjie Tang , Ka Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.livres.2025.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Noninvasive preoperative radiologic prediction of histologic grade—a key prognostic factor—is invaluable. We aim to compare the diagnostic values of 3D magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and conventional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in predicting the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This institutional review board-approved retrospective study included patients who underwent MRI between December 2014 and October 2021. Sixty-eight patients with pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent MRE, IVIM, and cMRI imaging were included in the analysis. Two radiologists measured HCC stiffness volumetrically and over a single slice, and also measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), IVIM-derived parameters, and enhancement ratio (ER) on arterial phase images via cMRI. Student’s <em>t</em>-test or the Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test was used for group comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Histologically, fifty-three (78%) patients had well-differentiated or moderately differentiated HCCs, and fifteen (22%) patients had poorly differentiated HCCs. Both the volumetric stiffness and single-ROI tumor stiffness were significantly elevated in the poorly differentiated HCC group (<em>P</em> < 0.001, <em>P</em> = 0.001), and the volumetric stiffness was a better measurement of stiffness because it had a higher ROC curve value (0.816). However, the ADC, the true diffusion coefficient (D), the pseudodiffusion coefficient (D∗), the pseudodiffusion fraction (f), and ER during the arterial phases on cMRI were not significantly different between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.309, 0.187, 0.440, 0.350, and 0.714, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stiffness measured with 3D MRE may be useful for noninvasively predicting HCC histologic grade, and the volumetric measuring method achieved the highest ROC curve value, outperforming single-ROI HCC stiffness, IVIM parameters, and arterial-phase ER on cMRI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36741,"journal":{"name":"Liver Research","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of 3D MR elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion for the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma grade\",\"authors\":\"Weimin Liu , Sidong Xie , Wenjie Tang , Ka Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.livres.2025.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Noninvasive preoperative radiologic prediction of histologic grade—a key prognostic factor—is invaluable. We aim to compare the diagnostic values of 3D magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and conventional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in predicting the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This institutional review board-approved retrospective study included patients who underwent MRI between December 2014 and October 2021. Sixty-eight patients with pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent MRE, IVIM, and cMRI imaging were included in the analysis. Two radiologists measured HCC stiffness volumetrically and over a single slice, and also measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), IVIM-derived parameters, and enhancement ratio (ER) on arterial phase images via cMRI. Student’s <em>t</em>-test or the Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test was used for group comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Histologically, fifty-three (78%) patients had well-differentiated or moderately differentiated HCCs, and fifteen (22%) patients had poorly differentiated HCCs. Both the volumetric stiffness and single-ROI tumor stiffness were significantly elevated in the poorly differentiated HCC group (<em>P</em> < 0.001, <em>P</em> = 0.001), and the volumetric stiffness was a better measurement of stiffness because it had a higher ROC curve value (0.816). However, the ADC, the true diffusion coefficient (D), the pseudodiffusion coefficient (D∗), the pseudodiffusion fraction (f), and ER during the arterial phases on cMRI were not significantly different between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.309, 0.187, 0.440, 0.350, and 0.714, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Stiffness measured with 3D MRE may be useful for noninvasively predicting HCC histologic grade, and the volumetric measuring method achieved the highest ROC curve value, outperforming single-ROI HCC stiffness, IVIM parameters, and arterial-phase ER on cMRI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Research\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 351-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542568425000716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542568425000716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的无创术前放射学预测组织学分级是非常重要的预后因素。我们的目的是比较三维磁共振弹性成像(MRE)、体素内非相干运动(IVIM)和常规对比增强磁共振成像(cMRI)在预测肝细胞癌(HCC)组织学分级方面的诊断价值。方法:本研究经机构审查委员会批准,纳入了2014年12月至2021年10月期间接受MRI检查的患者。68例病理证实的hcc患者接受了MRE、IVIM和cMRI成像。两名放射科医生通过体积和单片测量了HCC的硬度,并通过cMRI测量了动脉期图像的表观扩散系数(ADC)、ivim衍生参数和增强比(ER)。组间比较采用学生t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价诊断效果。结果组织学上,53例(78%)患者为高分化或中分化hcc, 15例(22%)患者为低分化hcc。在低分化HCC组中,体积刚度和单roi肿瘤刚度均显著升高(P < 0.001, P = 0.001),并且体积刚度由于具有更高的ROC曲线值(0.816)而成为更好的刚度测量指标。两组动脉期ADC、真扩散系数(D)、伪扩散系数(D *)、伪扩散分数(f)、ER均无显著差异(P值分别为0.309、0.187、0.440、0.350、0.714)。结论三维磁共振成像测量硬度可用于无创预测HCC组织学分级,体积测量方法获得最高的ROC曲线值,优于单一roi HCC硬度、IVIM参数和cMRI动脉期ER。
Comparative study of 3D MR elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion for the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma grade
Background and aims
Noninvasive preoperative radiologic prediction of histologic grade—a key prognostic factor—is invaluable. We aim to compare the diagnostic values of 3D magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and conventional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in predicting the histologic grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods
This institutional review board-approved retrospective study included patients who underwent MRI between December 2014 and October 2021. Sixty-eight patients with pathologically confirmed HCCs who underwent MRE, IVIM, and cMRI imaging were included in the analysis. Two radiologists measured HCC stiffness volumetrically and over a single slice, and also measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), IVIM-derived parameters, and enhancement ratio (ER) on arterial phase images via cMRI. Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test was used for group comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance.
Results
Histologically, fifty-three (78%) patients had well-differentiated or moderately differentiated HCCs, and fifteen (22%) patients had poorly differentiated HCCs. Both the volumetric stiffness and single-ROI tumor stiffness were significantly elevated in the poorly differentiated HCC group (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), and the volumetric stiffness was a better measurement of stiffness because it had a higher ROC curve value (0.816). However, the ADC, the true diffusion coefficient (D), the pseudodiffusion coefficient (D∗), the pseudodiffusion fraction (f), and ER during the arterial phases on cMRI were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.309, 0.187, 0.440, 0.350, and 0.714, respectively).
Conclusions
Stiffness measured with 3D MRE may be useful for noninvasively predicting HCC histologic grade, and the volumetric measuring method achieved the highest ROC curve value, outperforming single-ROI HCC stiffness, IVIM parameters, and arterial-phase ER on cMRI.