AAMD适应行为量表的综合评分。

American journal of mental deficiency Pub Date : 1987-09-01

D V Vandergriff, J R Hester, D A Mandra

{"title":"AAMD适应行为量表的综合评分。","authors":"D V Vandergriff, J R Hester, D A Mandra","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS) Part One ratings by one rater who completed the entire scale was compared with the composite rating by a group of raters, each of whom completed only a portion of the ABS. Individual and composite ratings were obtained for 40 retarded clients. In using total scores, we found that composite ratings were significantly higher than individual ratings.","PeriodicalId":75475,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental deficiency","volume":"92 2","pages":"203-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Composite ratings on the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale.\",\"authors\":\"D V Vandergriff, J R Hester, D A Mandra\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS) Part One ratings by one rater who completed the entire scale was compared with the composite rating by a group of raters, each of whom completed only a portion of the ABS. Individual and composite ratings were obtained for 40 retarded clients. In using total scores, we found that composite ratings were significantly higher than individual ratings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of mental deficiency\",\"volume\":\"92 2\",\"pages\":\"203-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of mental deficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental deficiency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

将一名完成了整个适应行为量表(ABS)第一部分的评分者的评分与一组只完成了部分ABS的评分者的综合评分进行比较。对40名智障客户进行了个人和综合评分。在使用总分时，我们发现综合评分明显高于个人评分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Composite ratings on the AAMD Adaptive Behavior Scale.

Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS) Part One ratings by one rater who completed the entire scale was compared with the composite rating by a group of raters, each of whom completed only a portion of the ABS. Individual and composite ratings were obtained for 40 retarded clients. In using total scores, we found that composite ratings were significantly higher than individual ratings.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American journal of mental deficiency

自引率

0.00%

发文量