考虑同居?随着时间的推移,同居的原因与关系的结果有关。

IF 1.6 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Claire L Chapman, Daphne Y Liu, Scott M Stanley, Galena K Rhoades
{"title":"考虑同居?随着时间的推移,同居的原因与关系的结果有关。","authors":"Claire L Chapman, Daphne Y Liu, Scott M Stanley, Galena K Rhoades","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Romantic couples moving in together (i.e., cohabitation) is a normative stage of romantic relationships, and people report different reasons for moving in together. Few studies have examined whether reasons for cohabitation have implications for relationship functioning over time. This study investigated how three commonly endorsed reasons for cohabitation (i.e., to spend time together, to test the relationship, and out of convenience) were associated with relationship outcomes (relationship functioning and dissolution) over time. In a five-year longitudinal study (from 2007 to 2012), adults (<i>N</i>=485) who were in opposite-sex relationships and moved in with their partner were surveyed on their reasons for cohabitation (closest in time to moving in together), and their relationship status and functioning (in up to 11 waves of surveys). Results showed that greater endorsement of cohabiting to spend time together predicted better overall relationship functioning after cohabiting. Greater endorsement of testing the relationship predicted worse overall relationship functioning and a higher likelihood of relationship dissolution after cohabiting. Moving in together out of convenience did not predict post-cohabitation relationship outcomes. The three reasons did not predict over-time trajectories (i.e., slopes) of relationship functioning. Instead, people showed similar trajectories of relationship functioning after moving in together regardless of their reasons for cohabitation, albeit at different levels that were differentiated at the time of moving in together. Reasons for cohabitation appear to reflect pre-existing relationship quality, instead of impacting its post-cohabitation trajectories. Findings highlight the importance of couples discussing their reasons for cohabitation when making decisions about moving in together.</p>","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12636531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thinking about Moving in Together? Reasons for Cohabitation are Associated with Relationship Outcomes Over Time.\",\"authors\":\"Claire L Chapman, Daphne Y Liu, Scott M Stanley, Galena K Rhoades\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cfp0000286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Romantic couples moving in together (i.e., cohabitation) is a normative stage of romantic relationships, and people report different reasons for moving in together. Few studies have examined whether reasons for cohabitation have implications for relationship functioning over time. This study investigated how three commonly endorsed reasons for cohabitation (i.e., to spend time together, to test the relationship, and out of convenience) were associated with relationship outcomes (relationship functioning and dissolution) over time. In a five-year longitudinal study (from 2007 to 2012), adults (<i>N</i>=485) who were in opposite-sex relationships and moved in with their partner were surveyed on their reasons for cohabitation (closest in time to moving in together), and their relationship status and functioning (in up to 11 waves of surveys). Results showed that greater endorsement of cohabiting to spend time together predicted better overall relationship functioning after cohabiting. Greater endorsement of testing the relationship predicted worse overall relationship functioning and a higher likelihood of relationship dissolution after cohabiting. Moving in together out of convenience did not predict post-cohabitation relationship outcomes. The three reasons did not predict over-time trajectories (i.e., slopes) of relationship functioning. Instead, people showed similar trajectories of relationship functioning after moving in together regardless of their reasons for cohabitation, albeit at different levels that were differentiated at the time of moving in together. Reasons for cohabitation appear to reflect pre-existing relationship quality, instead of impacting its post-cohabitation trajectories. Findings highlight the importance of couples discussing their reasons for cohabitation when making decisions about moving in together.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12636531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情侣搬到一起(即同居)是恋爱关系的一个规范阶段,人们报告了搬到一起的不同原因。很少有研究调查同居的原因是否会影响一段时间的关系功能。这项研究调查了三个普遍认可的同居原因(即,花时间在一起,测试关系,出于方便)是如何随着时间的推移与关系结果(关系功能和解散)相关联的。在一项为期五年的纵向研究中(从2007年到2012年),研究人员调查了与伴侣同居的异性成年人(N=485)的同居原因(最接近同居的时间),以及他们的关系状况和功能(多达11波调查)。结果表明,更多的赞同同居的人花时间在一起预示着同居后更好的整体关系功能。对测试关系的认可程度越高,预示着整体关系功能越差,同居后关系破裂的可能性越大。出于方便而同居并不能预测同居后的关系结果。这三个原因并不能预测关系功能的随时间轨迹(即斜率)。相反,不管同居的原因是什么,人们在同居后表现出相似的关系功能轨迹,尽管在同居时不同的水平有所不同。同居的原因似乎反映了先前的关系质量,而不是影响同居后的轨迹。研究结果强调了夫妻在决定是否同居时讨论同居原因的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thinking about Moving in Together? Reasons for Cohabitation are Associated with Relationship Outcomes Over Time.

Romantic couples moving in together (i.e., cohabitation) is a normative stage of romantic relationships, and people report different reasons for moving in together. Few studies have examined whether reasons for cohabitation have implications for relationship functioning over time. This study investigated how three commonly endorsed reasons for cohabitation (i.e., to spend time together, to test the relationship, and out of convenience) were associated with relationship outcomes (relationship functioning and dissolution) over time. In a five-year longitudinal study (from 2007 to 2012), adults (N=485) who were in opposite-sex relationships and moved in with their partner were surveyed on their reasons for cohabitation (closest in time to moving in together), and their relationship status and functioning (in up to 11 waves of surveys). Results showed that greater endorsement of cohabiting to spend time together predicted better overall relationship functioning after cohabiting. Greater endorsement of testing the relationship predicted worse overall relationship functioning and a higher likelihood of relationship dissolution after cohabiting. Moving in together out of convenience did not predict post-cohabitation relationship outcomes. The three reasons did not predict over-time trajectories (i.e., slopes) of relationship functioning. Instead, people showed similar trajectories of relationship functioning after moving in together regardless of their reasons for cohabitation, albeit at different levels that were differentiated at the time of moving in together. Reasons for cohabitation appear to reflect pre-existing relationship quality, instead of impacting its post-cohabitation trajectories. Findings highlight the importance of couples discussing their reasons for cohabitation when making decisions about moving in together.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice ® (CFP) is a scholarly journal publishing peer-reviewed papers representing the science and practice of family psychology. CFP is the official publication of APA Division 43 (Society for Couple and Family Psychology) and is intended to be a forum for scholarly dialogue regarding the most important emerging issues in the field, a primary outlet for research particularly as it impacts practice and for papers regarding education, public policy, and the identity of the profession of family psychology. As the official journal for the Society, CFP will provide a home for the members of the division and those in other fields interested in the most cutting edge issues in family psychology. Unlike other journals in the field, CFP is focused specifically on family psychology as a specialty practice, unique scientific domain, and critical element of psychological knowledge. CFP will seek and publish scholarly manuscripts that make a contribution to the knowledge base of family psychology specifically, and the science and practice of working with individuals, couples and families from a family systems perspective in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书