商业和金融走向有意义的生物多样性报告?

IF 8.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shruti Kashyap , Charles Mario Abela , Veronique Blum , Beatrice Crona
{"title":"商业和金融走向有意义的生物多样性报告?","authors":"Shruti Kashyap ,&nbsp;Charles Mario Abela ,&nbsp;Veronique Blum ,&nbsp;Beatrice Crona","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Corporate biodiversity reporting is critical for assessing planetary health and meeting biodiversity targets, yet current frameworks and practices remain insufficient. This paper reviews 51 academic articles, along with additional policy and legal sources, and evaluates 30 biodiversity assessment tools to examine the state of biodiversity reporting. The analysis identifies three interlinked challenges of complexity, conceptualization, and governance. These challenges arise from gaps in knowledge, methods, and data, and are reinforced by the dominance of financial logics over ecological realities. Collectively, these challenges limit the reliability of reporting and the usefulness of existing tools for decision-making and risk mitigation. The paper concludes that meaningful biodiversity reporting requires closer integration of ecological knowledge and clearer alignment with the best available science. Important research and policy steps towards meaningful biodiversity reporting include establishing mandatory, standardized corporate disclosures of impact data linked to the five drivers of biodiversity loss, and stronger coordination across legal, accounting, and scientific domains on issues of materiality, risk, and valuation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101588"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business and finance on a path towards meaningful biodiversity reporting?\",\"authors\":\"Shruti Kashyap ,&nbsp;Charles Mario Abela ,&nbsp;Veronique Blum ,&nbsp;Beatrice Crona\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Corporate biodiversity reporting is critical for assessing planetary health and meeting biodiversity targets, yet current frameworks and practices remain insufficient. This paper reviews 51 academic articles, along with additional policy and legal sources, and evaluates 30 biodiversity assessment tools to examine the state of biodiversity reporting. The analysis identifies three interlinked challenges of complexity, conceptualization, and governance. These challenges arise from gaps in knowledge, methods, and data, and are reinforced by the dominance of financial logics over ecological realities. Collectively, these challenges limit the reliability of reporting and the usefulness of existing tools for decision-making and risk mitigation. The paper concludes that meaningful biodiversity reporting requires closer integration of ecological knowledge and clearer alignment with the best available science. Important research and policy steps towards meaningful biodiversity reporting include establishing mandatory, standardized corporate disclosures of impact data linked to the five drivers of biodiversity loss, and stronger coordination across legal, accounting, and scientific domains on issues of materiality, risk, and valuation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343525000818\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343525000818","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业生物多样性报告对于评估地球健康和实现生物多样性目标至关重要,但目前的框架和做法仍然不足。本文回顾了51篇学术论文,并结合政策和法律来源,对30种生物多样性评估工具进行了评价,以考察生物多样性报告的现状。该分析确定了复杂性、概念化和治理这三个相互关联的挑战。这些挑战来自知识、方法和数据方面的差距,而金融逻辑对生态现实的主导地位又加剧了这些挑战。总的来说,这些挑战限制了报告的可靠性和现有决策和减轻风险工具的有用性。这篇论文的结论是,有意义的生物多样性报告需要更紧密地整合生态知识,并更明确地与现有的最佳科学相结合。实现有意义的生物多样性报告的重要研究和政策步骤包括建立强制性的、标准化的企业披露与生物多样性丧失的五个驱动因素相关的影响数据,以及在重要性、风险和估值问题上加强法律、会计和科学领域之间的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Business and finance on a path towards meaningful biodiversity reporting?
Corporate biodiversity reporting is critical for assessing planetary health and meeting biodiversity targets, yet current frameworks and practices remain insufficient. This paper reviews 51 academic articles, along with additional policy and legal sources, and evaluates 30 biodiversity assessment tools to examine the state of biodiversity reporting. The analysis identifies three interlinked challenges of complexity, conceptualization, and governance. These challenges arise from gaps in knowledge, methods, and data, and are reinforced by the dominance of financial logics over ecological realities. Collectively, these challenges limit the reliability of reporting and the usefulness of existing tools for decision-making and risk mitigation. The paper concludes that meaningful biodiversity reporting requires closer integration of ecological knowledge and clearer alignment with the best available science. Important research and policy steps towards meaningful biodiversity reporting include establishing mandatory, standardized corporate disclosures of impact data linked to the five drivers of biodiversity loss, and stronger coordination across legal, accounting, and scientific domains on issues of materiality, risk, and valuation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书