日常人际关系紧张作为对交流和代理、应对和感知应对效能的威胁的预测因素:不良童年经历的作用。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2025.2579952
Olive Chung-Hui Huang, Nicole S Stuart, Talia Morstead, Anita DeLongis, Nancy L Sin
{"title":"日常人际关系紧张作为对交流和代理、应对和感知应对效能的威胁的预测因素:不良童年经历的作用。","authors":"Olive Chung-Hui Huang, Nicole S Stuart, Talia Morstead, Anita DeLongis, Nancy L Sin","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2025.2579952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Daily interpersonal tensions, common sources of stress, have well-established links to adverse psychological and physiological health outcomes. This study examined whether daily interpersonal tensions differ from other stressors in their relations to threat appraisals and coping, and how adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) contribute to this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-dwelling adults (N = 233, aged 25-87 years) reported ACEs and completed four mobile surveys per day for 14 days about stressors, threat appraisals for communion and agency, coping, and perceived coping efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel models found greater communal, but not agentic, threat appraisals on days with interpersonal tensions (vs. days with other stressors). On such days, there was less support seeking, more avoidance, and lower perceived coping efficacy, but no differences in problem solving or reappraisal. The within-person relationship between interpersonal tensions and avoidance (but not other coping approaches) was more pronounced in individuals with more ACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to other daily stressors, interpersonal tensions were associated with greater communal threat appraisals, and engagement in less effective coping responses. People with more ACEs tended to disengage more from interpersonal tensions than from other stressors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"302-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daily interpersonal tensions as predictors of threats to communion and agency, coping, and perceived coping efficacy: role of adverse childhood experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Olive Chung-Hui Huang, Nicole S Stuart, Talia Morstead, Anita DeLongis, Nancy L Sin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2025.2579952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Daily interpersonal tensions, common sources of stress, have well-established links to adverse psychological and physiological health outcomes. This study examined whether daily interpersonal tensions differ from other stressors in their relations to threat appraisals and coping, and how adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) contribute to this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-dwelling adults (N = 233, aged 25-87 years) reported ACEs and completed four mobile surveys per day for 14 days about stressors, threat appraisals for communion and agency, coping, and perceived coping efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel models found greater communal, but not agentic, threat appraisals on days with interpersonal tensions (vs. days with other stressors). On such days, there was less support seeking, more avoidance, and lower perceived coping efficacy, but no differences in problem solving or reappraisal. The within-person relationship between interpersonal tensions and avoidance (but not other coping approaches) was more pronounced in individuals with more ACEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to other daily stressors, interpersonal tensions were associated with greater communal threat appraisals, and engagement in less effective coping responses. People with more ACEs tended to disengage more from interpersonal tensions than from other stressors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"302-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2579952\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2579952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:日常人际关系紧张是压力的常见来源,与不利的心理和生理健康结果有明确的联系。本研究考察了日常人际关系紧张与其他压力源在威胁评估和应对方面的关系,以及不良童年经历(ace)对这一过程的影响。方法:233名25-87岁的社区居民报告了ace,并完成了4次移动调查,每天14天,涉及压力源、交流和代理的威胁评估、应对和感知应对效能。结果:多层次模型发现,人际关系紧张的日子(与其他压力源的日子相比)有更大的社区威胁评估,而不是代理威胁评估。在这些日子里,寻求支持的人较少,逃避的人较多,感知到的应对效能较低,但在解决问题和重新评估方面没有差异。人际紧张和回避之间的人际关系(而不是其他应对方法)在ace较多的个体中更为明显。结论:与其他日常压力源相比,人际关系紧张与更大的社区威胁评估相关,并且参与的有效应对反应较低。与其他压力源相比,拥有更多ace的人更倾向于从人际关系紧张中解脱出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Daily interpersonal tensions as predictors of threats to communion and agency, coping, and perceived coping efficacy: role of adverse childhood experiences.

Background: Daily interpersonal tensions, common sources of stress, have well-established links to adverse psychological and physiological health outcomes. This study examined whether daily interpersonal tensions differ from other stressors in their relations to threat appraisals and coping, and how adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) contribute to this process.

Methods: Community-dwelling adults (N = 233, aged 25-87 years) reported ACEs and completed four mobile surveys per day for 14 days about stressors, threat appraisals for communion and agency, coping, and perceived coping efficacy.

Results: Multilevel models found greater communal, but not agentic, threat appraisals on days with interpersonal tensions (vs. days with other stressors). On such days, there was less support seeking, more avoidance, and lower perceived coping efficacy, but no differences in problem solving or reappraisal. The within-person relationship between interpersonal tensions and avoidance (but not other coping approaches) was more pronounced in individuals with more ACEs.

Conclusion: Compared to other daily stressors, interpersonal tensions were associated with greater communal threat appraisals, and engagement in less effective coping responses. People with more ACEs tended to disengage more from interpersonal tensions than from other stressors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书