{"title":"对罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞逆转,糖madex滴定与制造商推荐的效果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。","authors":"Lingqi Gao, Bing Li, Jingjing Shen, Yuran Zhao, Jiazheng Qi, Tingting Gu, Wenxiang Bao, Yue Hu, Zhoujing Yang, Bo Xu, Zhao Zhang, Bingyan Zhang, Mengqiang Luo, Qiong Yu, Yingwei Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03398-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both under-dosing and over-dosing of sugammadex for reversing neuromuscular block pose risks to patients, yet the optimal dosage for different degrees of neuromuscular block remains undefined. This study compared titration with single bolus of sugammadex recommended by manufacturer to determine the optimal dose for achieving a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9 or greater while minimizing residual paralysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to titrated group or manufacturer-recommended group. In titrated group, sugammadex was given in 50-mg increments every 5 min until a TOFR of 0.9 or greater was reached. In recommended group, a single dose (2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg) was given based on train-of-four count (TOFC). Neuromuscular block was monitored continuously, and residual paralysis was assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 210 enrolled patients, 205 were evaluated. The median dose of sugammadex for reversing different depths of neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium was ascertained via the titration method in this study. Titrated group required significantly less sugammadex to achieve a TOFR of at least 0.9 compared to recommended group (P < 0.001). Residual paralysis incidence was similar between groups (5.4% in titrated group vs. 4.9% in recommended group; P = 0.564). Although recovery time was longer in titrated group, extubation time and length of stay in the PACU were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Titrated sugammadex administration significantly reduces required dosage without increasing residual paralysis risk. Continuous neuromuscular monitoring postoperatively is strongly recommended due to individual variability in dosage needs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 4, 2024(ChiCTR2400081540).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of sugammadex titration versus manufacturer's recommendation for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lingqi Gao, Bing Li, Jingjing Shen, Yuran Zhao, Jiazheng Qi, Tingting Gu, Wenxiang Bao, Yue Hu, Zhoujing Yang, Bo Xu, Zhao Zhang, Bingyan Zhang, Mengqiang Luo, Qiong Yu, Yingwei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03398-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both under-dosing and over-dosing of sugammadex for reversing neuromuscular block pose risks to patients, yet the optimal dosage for different degrees of neuromuscular block remains undefined. This study compared titration with single bolus of sugammadex recommended by manufacturer to determine the optimal dose for achieving a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9 or greater while minimizing residual paralysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to titrated group or manufacturer-recommended group. In titrated group, sugammadex was given in 50-mg increments every 5 min until a TOFR of 0.9 or greater was reached. In recommended group, a single dose (2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg) was given based on train-of-four count (TOFC). Neuromuscular block was monitored continuously, and residual paralysis was assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 210 enrolled patients, 205 were evaluated. The median dose of sugammadex for reversing different depths of neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium was ascertained via the titration method in this study. Titrated group required significantly less sugammadex to achieve a TOFR of at least 0.9 compared to recommended group (P < 0.001). Residual paralysis incidence was similar between groups (5.4% in titrated group vs. 4.9% in recommended group; P = 0.564). Although recovery time was longer in titrated group, extubation time and length of stay in the PACU were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Titrated sugammadex administration significantly reduces required dosage without increasing residual paralysis risk. Continuous neuromuscular monitoring postoperatively is strongly recommended due to individual variability in dosage needs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 4, 2024(ChiCTR2400081540).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03398-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03398-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of sugammadex titration versus manufacturer's recommendation for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Background: Both under-dosing and over-dosing of sugammadex for reversing neuromuscular block pose risks to patients, yet the optimal dosage for different degrees of neuromuscular block remains undefined. This study compared titration with single bolus of sugammadex recommended by manufacturer to determine the optimal dose for achieving a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9 or greater while minimizing residual paralysis.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to titrated group or manufacturer-recommended group. In titrated group, sugammadex was given in 50-mg increments every 5 min until a TOFR of 0.9 or greater was reached. In recommended group, a single dose (2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg) was given based on train-of-four count (TOFC). Neuromuscular block was monitored continuously, and residual paralysis was assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Results: Of 210 enrolled patients, 205 were evaluated. The median dose of sugammadex for reversing different depths of neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium was ascertained via the titration method in this study. Titrated group required significantly less sugammadex to achieve a TOFR of at least 0.9 compared to recommended group (P < 0.001). Residual paralysis incidence was similar between groups (5.4% in titrated group vs. 4.9% in recommended group; P = 0.564). Although recovery time was longer in titrated group, extubation time and length of stay in the PACU were comparable.
Conclusions: Titrated sugammadex administration significantly reduces required dosage without increasing residual paralysis risk. Continuous neuromuscular monitoring postoperatively is strongly recommended due to individual variability in dosage needs.
Trial registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 4, 2024(ChiCTR2400081540).
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.