意向教学法与制定教学法的一致性:巴基斯坦英语教学课程创新实施的研究

IF 8 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
System Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.system.2025.103872
Shahzad Karim , Nigel Harwood
{"title":"意向教学法与制定教学法的一致性:巴基斯坦英语教学课程创新实施的研究","authors":"Shahzad Karim ,&nbsp;Nigel Harwood","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the alignment between English language education (ELE) pedagogy in policy (the pedagogical practices outlined in the ELE national curriculum) and pedagogy in practice (the pedagogical methods implemented by teachers in the classroom) at the secondary level (grades 9–10) in public schools in Punjab, Pakistan. The study is contextualised within the framework of ELE reforms, which were vital components of the broader Education Sector Reforms programme, initiated in Pakistan between 2001 and 2005. As part of these ELE reforms, a revised curriculum for English language instruction was introduced, promoting a comprehensive set of pedagogical principles that prioritise communicative, learner-centred, and inductive teaching approaches. Thirty-six English language lessons by twelve teachers were observed to assess their adherence to the pedagogical practices stipulated by the national curriculum. Additionally, post-observation interviews were conducted with the teachers to explore their reasoning behind the pedagogical strategies they employed or avoided in their instruction. The findings reveal a low level of compliance (29 %) with the recommended pedagogical policy. Key factors contributing to this compliance gap include exam-related pressures, institutional challenges, infrastructure limitations, and students’ low proficiency in English. The study has important implications for education policymakers, curriculum developers, administrators, and teachers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 103872"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alignment between intended and enacted pedagogies: A study of ELT curriculum innovation implementation in Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Shahzad Karim ,&nbsp;Nigel Harwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2025.103872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the alignment between English language education (ELE) pedagogy in policy (the pedagogical practices outlined in the ELE national curriculum) and pedagogy in practice (the pedagogical methods implemented by teachers in the classroom) at the secondary level (grades 9–10) in public schools in Punjab, Pakistan. The study is contextualised within the framework of ELE reforms, which were vital components of the broader Education Sector Reforms programme, initiated in Pakistan between 2001 and 2005. As part of these ELE reforms, a revised curriculum for English language instruction was introduced, promoting a comprehensive set of pedagogical principles that prioritise communicative, learner-centred, and inductive teaching approaches. Thirty-six English language lessons by twelve teachers were observed to assess their adherence to the pedagogical practices stipulated by the national curriculum. Additionally, post-observation interviews were conducted with the teachers to explore their reasoning behind the pedagogical strategies they employed or avoided in their instruction. The findings reveal a low level of compliance (29 %) with the recommended pedagogical policy. Key factors contributing to this compliance gap include exam-related pressures, institutional challenges, infrastructure limitations, and students’ low proficiency in English. The study has important implications for education policymakers, curriculum developers, administrators, and teachers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002829\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了巴基斯坦旁遮普公立学校中学(9-10年级)英语语言教育(ELE)政策教育学(ELE国家课程中概述的教学实践)和实践教育学(教师在课堂上实施的教学方法)之间的一致性。这项研究是在教育改革的框架内进行的,教育改革是2001年至2005年在巴基斯坦启动的更广泛的教育部门改革计划的重要组成部分。作为这些教育改革的一部分,修订了英语语言教学课程,促进了一套全面的教学原则,优先考虑交际,以学习者为中心和归纳教学方法。研究人员观察了12名教师的36节英语课,以评估他们对国家课程规定的教学实践的遵守程度。此外,对教师进行了观察后访谈,以探讨他们在教学中使用或避免的教学策略背后的原因。调查结果显示,对推荐的教学政策的遵从程度很低(29%)。造成这种遵从性差距的主要因素包括考试相关压力、制度挑战、基础设施限制和学生英语水平低。本研究对教育政策制定者、课程开发者、管理者和教师具有重要的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alignment between intended and enacted pedagogies: A study of ELT curriculum innovation implementation in Pakistan
This study investigates the alignment between English language education (ELE) pedagogy in policy (the pedagogical practices outlined in the ELE national curriculum) and pedagogy in practice (the pedagogical methods implemented by teachers in the classroom) at the secondary level (grades 9–10) in public schools in Punjab, Pakistan. The study is contextualised within the framework of ELE reforms, which were vital components of the broader Education Sector Reforms programme, initiated in Pakistan between 2001 and 2005. As part of these ELE reforms, a revised curriculum for English language instruction was introduced, promoting a comprehensive set of pedagogical principles that prioritise communicative, learner-centred, and inductive teaching approaches. Thirty-six English language lessons by twelve teachers were observed to assess their adherence to the pedagogical practices stipulated by the national curriculum. Additionally, post-observation interviews were conducted with the teachers to explore their reasoning behind the pedagogical strategies they employed or avoided in their instruction. The findings reveal a low level of compliance (29 %) with the recommended pedagogical policy. Key factors contributing to this compliance gap include exam-related pressures, institutional challenges, infrastructure limitations, and students’ low proficiency in English. The study has important implications for education policymakers, curriculum developers, administrators, and teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书