[高考学生选择护理培训及反对护理学习的理由-网上调查结果]。

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a001052
Bernd Reuschenbach, Bettina Dauer, Johanna C Müller, Julia Blumenschein, Daniel Großmann
{"title":"[高考学生选择护理培训及反对护理学习的理由-网上调查结果]。","authors":"Bernd Reuschenbach, Bettina Dauer, Johanna C Müller, Julia Blumenschein, Daniel Großmann","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a001052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reasons given by students with university entrance qualification to study for nursing training and against nursing studies - Results of an E-Survey <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> Despite the efforts towards academization in nursing and the recommendation of the German Council of Science and Humanities to provide up to 20% of healthcare professionals with higher education qualifications, the academization rate for primary qualifying courses was only 0.97% in 2022. The proportion of those entitled to study in nursing training amounted to 15.6% overall. <i>Aim:</i> This study examines the reasons why those with university entrance qualifications decide in favor of nursing training and thus against studying nursing. <i>Method:</i> A nationwide online survey was conducted in Germany between February and April 2024 reached nursing trainees with a higher education entrance qualification (N = 625). <i>Results:</i> The results show that the desire for practical work (51.9%) is the main reason against studying nursing, followed by the intention to study only after training (35.4%). Other important factors are a lack of information about nursing studies (33.8%) and financial aspects (33.1%). <i>Conclusions:</i> There are knowledge deficits regarding the financing of studies as well as the equivalence of studies and training, particularly with regard to practical orientation and learning periods in practical placements. The findings are relevant for the further application to potential students and development of higher education nursing training.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reasons given by students with university entrance qualification to study for nursing training and against nursing studies - Results of an E-Survey].\",\"authors\":\"Bernd Reuschenbach, Bettina Dauer, Johanna C Müller, Julia Blumenschein, Daniel Großmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1012-5302/a001052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reasons given by students with university entrance qualification to study for nursing training and against nursing studies - Results of an E-Survey <b>Abstract:</b> <i>Background:</i> Despite the efforts towards academization in nursing and the recommendation of the German Council of Science and Humanities to provide up to 20% of healthcare professionals with higher education qualifications, the academization rate for primary qualifying courses was only 0.97% in 2022. The proportion of those entitled to study in nursing training amounted to 15.6% overall. <i>Aim:</i> This study examines the reasons why those with university entrance qualifications decide in favor of nursing training and thus against studying nursing. <i>Method:</i> A nationwide online survey was conducted in Germany between February and April 2024 reached nursing trainees with a higher education entrance qualification (N = 625). <i>Results:</i> The results show that the desire for practical work (51.9%) is the main reason against studying nursing, followed by the intention to study only after training (35.4%). Other important factors are a lack of information about nursing studies (33.8%) and financial aspects (33.1%). <i>Conclusions:</i> There are knowledge deficits regarding the financing of studies as well as the equivalence of studies and training, particularly with regard to practical orientation and learning periods in practical placements. The findings are relevant for the further application to potential students and development of higher education nursing training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pflege\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pflege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001052\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a001052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:背景:尽管在护理方面做出了努力,德国科学与人文委员会建议提供高达20%的具有高等教育资格的医疗保健专业人员,但2022年初级资格课程的学院化率仅为0.97%。有资格在护理培训中学习的占总人数的15.6%。目的:本研究探讨具有大学入学资格的人选择护理培训而不选择护理专业的原因。方法:于2024年2月至4月在德国进行全国范围内的在线调查,调查对象为具有高等教育入学资格的护理实习生(N = 625)。结果:对实际工作的渴望(51.9%)是不愿学习护理专业的主要原因,其次是培训后再学习(35.4%)。其他重要因素是缺乏护理学习的信息(33.8%)和财务方面的信息(33.1%)。结论:在研究资金以及研究和培训的等效性方面存在知识赤字,特别是在实践方向和实际实习的学习时间方面。研究结果对未来护理人才的进一步应用和高等教育护理培训的发展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Reasons given by students with university entrance qualification to study for nursing training and against nursing studies - Results of an E-Survey].

Reasons given by students with university entrance qualification to study for nursing training and against nursing studies - Results of an E-Survey Abstract: Background: Despite the efforts towards academization in nursing and the recommendation of the German Council of Science and Humanities to provide up to 20% of healthcare professionals with higher education qualifications, the academization rate for primary qualifying courses was only 0.97% in 2022. The proportion of those entitled to study in nursing training amounted to 15.6% overall. Aim: This study examines the reasons why those with university entrance qualifications decide in favor of nursing training and thus against studying nursing. Method: A nationwide online survey was conducted in Germany between February and April 2024 reached nursing trainees with a higher education entrance qualification (N = 625). Results: The results show that the desire for practical work (51.9%) is the main reason against studying nursing, followed by the intention to study only after training (35.4%). Other important factors are a lack of information about nursing studies (33.8%) and financial aspects (33.1%). Conclusions: There are knowledge deficits regarding the financing of studies as well as the equivalence of studies and training, particularly with regard to practical orientation and learning periods in practical placements. The findings are relevant for the further application to potential students and development of higher education nursing training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书