Emma Duffield, Liza Keating, Sarah Wilson, Amelia Hollywood
{"title":"急诊科成人疼痛评分:范围审查方案","authors":"Emma Duffield, Liza Keating, Sarah Wilson, Amelia Hollywood","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain is a common complaint in patients presenting to an Emergency Department (ED). Data show that timely delivery of pain relief in this setting remains a challenge. Adequate treatment of pain requires recognition and assessment. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine advocates for early pain assessment and reassessment post-analgesia; however, it does not specify how best to do this. Therefore, a review of existing literature is needed to identify which pain assessment tools have been shown to be useful in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A search of PubMed, Embase, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will identify relevant studies published in English since January 2004. Studies will be included that recruit adults (aged 18 years and over) presenting to an ED with acute pain (duration under 3 months). Publications must assess or compare tools for measuring pain in an ED setting. Full-text articles published internationally will be considered. After duplicate removal, abstract screening and full-text analysis by two independent reviewers will identify relevant papers, using the inclusion criteria. Discrepancy resolution will be via a third reviewer. Pain measurement tools and their evidence will be extracted, collated and described. The findings will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required for this review. Published results will be shared with relevant parties interested in ED pain management. Potential next steps include patient involvement in the evaluation of pain assessment tools identified in this review and implementation into practice. The insights of patients with relevant lived experience in assessing these tools would be invaluable to the objective of improving pain management in the emergency setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>This project is registered with the Open Science Framework accessible at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ENVPY.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e106729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult pain scores in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Duffield, Liza Keating, Sarah Wilson, Amelia Hollywood\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain is a common complaint in patients presenting to an Emergency Department (ED). Data show that timely delivery of pain relief in this setting remains a challenge. Adequate treatment of pain requires recognition and assessment. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine advocates for early pain assessment and reassessment post-analgesia; however, it does not specify how best to do this. Therefore, a review of existing literature is needed to identify which pain assessment tools have been shown to be useful in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A search of PubMed, Embase, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will identify relevant studies published in English since January 2004. Studies will be included that recruit adults (aged 18 years and over) presenting to an ED with acute pain (duration under 3 months). Publications must assess or compare tools for measuring pain in an ED setting. Full-text articles published internationally will be considered. After duplicate removal, abstract screening and full-text analysis by two independent reviewers will identify relevant papers, using the inclusion criteria. Discrepancy resolution will be via a third reviewer. Pain measurement tools and their evidence will be extracted, collated and described. The findings will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required for this review. Published results will be shared with relevant parties interested in ED pain management. Potential next steps include patient involvement in the evaluation of pain assessment tools identified in this review and implementation into practice. The insights of patients with relevant lived experience in assessing these tools would be invaluable to the objective of improving pain management in the emergency setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>This project is registered with the Open Science Framework accessible at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ENVPY.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e106729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106729\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:疼痛是急诊科(ED)患者常见的主诉。数据显示,在这种情况下,及时提供疼痛缓解仍然是一个挑战。适当的治疗疼痛需要识别和评估。英国皇家急诊医学院提倡早期疼痛评估和镇痛后重新评估;然而,它没有具体说明如何最好地做到这一点。因此,需要对现有文献进行回顾,以确定哪些疼痛评估工具已被证明对ed有用。方法和分析:该范围审查将使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法。检索PubMed, Embase,护理和相关健康文献累积索引,Web of Science, Scopus和Cochrane图书馆将发现2004年1月以来发表的相关英文研究。研究将包括招募成人(年龄在18岁及以上)出现急性疼痛(持续时间在3个月以下)的ED。出版物必须评估或比较测量ED疼痛的工具。将考虑在国际上发表的全文文章。经过重复删除、摘要筛选和两名独立审稿人的全文分析,将根据纳入标准确定相关论文。差异将通过第三位审稿人解决。疼痛测量工具及其证据将被提取、整理和描述。研究结果将根据系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的荟萃分析进行报告。伦理和传播:本综述不需要伦理批准。发表的结果将与对ED疼痛管理感兴趣的相关各方分享。潜在的下一步包括患者参与评估疼痛评估工具确定在本次审查和实施到实践中。具有相关生活经验的患者在评估这些工具方面的见解对于改善急诊环境中的疼痛管理目标将是非常宝贵的。试验注册号:该项目已在开放科学框架(Open Science Framework)注册,可访问网址为https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ENVPY。
Adult pain scores in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol.
Introduction: Pain is a common complaint in patients presenting to an Emergency Department (ED). Data show that timely delivery of pain relief in this setting remains a challenge. Adequate treatment of pain requires recognition and assessment. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine advocates for early pain assessment and reassessment post-analgesia; however, it does not specify how best to do this. Therefore, a review of existing literature is needed to identify which pain assessment tools have been shown to be useful in the ED.
Methods and analysis: This scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A search of PubMed, Embase, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will identify relevant studies published in English since January 2004. Studies will be included that recruit adults (aged 18 years and over) presenting to an ED with acute pain (duration under 3 months). Publications must assess or compare tools for measuring pain in an ED setting. Full-text articles published internationally will be considered. After duplicate removal, abstract screening and full-text analysis by two independent reviewers will identify relevant papers, using the inclusion criteria. Discrepancy resolution will be via a third reviewer. Pain measurement tools and their evidence will be extracted, collated and described. The findings will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this review. Published results will be shared with relevant parties interested in ED pain management. Potential next steps include patient involvement in the evaluation of pain assessment tools identified in this review and implementation into practice. The insights of patients with relevant lived experience in assessing these tools would be invaluable to the objective of improving pain management in the emergency setting.
Trial registration number: This project is registered with the Open Science Framework accessible at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ENVPY.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.