虚拟现实用于重症监护室患者放松:可行性、可接受性和干预适应。

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ann Louise Hanifa, Pia Dreyer, Søren Aagaard, Anna Holm
{"title":"虚拟现实用于重症监护室患者放松:可行性、可接受性和干预适应。","authors":"Ann Louise Hanifa, Pia Dreyer, Søren Aagaard, Anna Holm","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01707-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Less sedation has become the standard regimen in patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Consequently, conscious patients experience discomfort and anxiety during their admission. Virtual reality is used in other hospital settings to distract patients and reduce discomfort and anxiety; however, its acceptability in intensive care has yet to be explored. This study aimed to identify and adapt a virtual reality intervention for relaxation and distraction to meet the specific needs of patients admitted to an intensive care unit, focusing on patients' and nurses' acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory study was guided by the Medical Research Council's framework for developing or identifying, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. In the initial phase, combined knowledge from existing literature and experts in virtual reality for healthcare guided the preliminary identification process. Findings from think-aloud interviews with stakeholders guided the final adaptations. The data was analysed using the framework method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined findings from the literature, stakeholder audit trails and interviews showed consensus that nature films with auditory stimuli were acceptable for inducing relaxation and distraction in critically ill patients, with few or no adverse effects. A key uncertainty regarding virtual reality's effect on delirium or its potential role in delirium development affected nurses' acceptability of virtual reality, highlighting a need to consider this risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This intervention identification, adaptation, acceptability and feasibility study concludes that virtual reality for relaxation and distraction is an acceptable intervention in the intensive care unit setting. The identified and adapted virtual reality software intervention was a 10-min 360-degree natural beach film combined with nature sounds and calming music. The identified hardware intervention was a headset connected to a tablet, enabling nurses to control the software. A subsequent study should examine the preliminary short effectiveness and adapt the intervention according to the further findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered in Open Science Framework 14 Feb 2024. Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BYZ42 .</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual reality for relaxation in intensive care unit patients: feasibility, acceptability and intervention adaptation.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Louise Hanifa, Pia Dreyer, Søren Aagaard, Anna Holm\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-025-01707-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Less sedation has become the standard regimen in patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Consequently, conscious patients experience discomfort and anxiety during their admission. Virtual reality is used in other hospital settings to distract patients and reduce discomfort and anxiety; however, its acceptability in intensive care has yet to be explored. This study aimed to identify and adapt a virtual reality intervention for relaxation and distraction to meet the specific needs of patients admitted to an intensive care unit, focusing on patients' and nurses' acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory study was guided by the Medical Research Council's framework for developing or identifying, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. In the initial phase, combined knowledge from existing literature and experts in virtual reality for healthcare guided the preliminary identification process. Findings from think-aloud interviews with stakeholders guided the final adaptations. The data was analysed using the framework method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined findings from the literature, stakeholder audit trails and interviews showed consensus that nature films with auditory stimuli were acceptable for inducing relaxation and distraction in critically ill patients, with few or no adverse effects. A key uncertainty regarding virtual reality's effect on delirium or its potential role in delirium development affected nurses' acceptability of virtual reality, highlighting a need to consider this risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This intervention identification, adaptation, acceptability and feasibility study concludes that virtual reality for relaxation and distraction is an acceptable intervention in the intensive care unit setting. The identified and adapted virtual reality software intervention was a 10-min 360-degree natural beach film combined with nature sounds and calming music. The identified hardware intervention was a headset connected to a tablet, enabling nurses to control the software. A subsequent study should examine the preliminary short effectiveness and adapt the intervention according to the further findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered in Open Science Framework 14 Feb 2024. Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BYZ42 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01707-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01707-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低剂量镇静已成为重症监护病房患者的标准治疗方案。因此,有意识的病人在入院期间会感到不适和焦虑。虚拟现实被用于其他医院环境,以分散患者的注意力,减少不适和焦虑;然而,它在重症监护中的可接受性还有待探索。本研究旨在确定和调整一种用于放松和分散注意力的虚拟现实干预,以满足入住重症监护病房的患者的特定需求,重点关注患者和护士对干预的可接受性。方法:本探索性研究以医学研究委员会制定或识别、评估和实施复杂干预措施的框架为指导。在初始阶段,结合现有文献和医疗保健虚拟现实专家的知识指导初步识别过程。与利益相关者进行的畅想访谈的结果指导了最终的调整。采用框架法对数据进行分析。结果:综合文献、利益相关者审计跟踪和访谈的研究结果表明,听觉刺激的自然电影对于危重患者的放松和注意力分散是可以接受的,几乎没有不良反应。关于虚拟现实对谵妄的影响或其在谵妄发展中的潜在作用的关键不确定性影响了护士对虚拟现实的可接受性,强调需要考虑这种风险。结论:这项干预识别、适应、可接受性和可行性研究表明,虚拟现实放松和分心是一种可接受的重症监护病房干预措施。确定和改编的虚拟现实软件干预是一个10分钟的360度自然海滩电影,结合自然声音和平静的音乐。确定的硬件干预是一个连接到平板电脑的耳机,使护士能够控制软件。后续研究应检查初步的短期效果,并根据进一步的发现调整干预措施。试验注册:回顾性注册于2024年2月14日开放科学框架。注册DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BYZ42。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Virtual reality for relaxation in intensive care unit patients: feasibility, acceptability and intervention adaptation.

Virtual reality for relaxation in intensive care unit patients: feasibility, acceptability and intervention adaptation.

Virtual reality for relaxation in intensive care unit patients: feasibility, acceptability and intervention adaptation.

Background: Less sedation has become the standard regimen in patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Consequently, conscious patients experience discomfort and anxiety during their admission. Virtual reality is used in other hospital settings to distract patients and reduce discomfort and anxiety; however, its acceptability in intensive care has yet to be explored. This study aimed to identify and adapt a virtual reality intervention for relaxation and distraction to meet the specific needs of patients admitted to an intensive care unit, focusing on patients' and nurses' acceptability of the intervention.

Methods: This exploratory study was guided by the Medical Research Council's framework for developing or identifying, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. In the initial phase, combined knowledge from existing literature and experts in virtual reality for healthcare guided the preliminary identification process. Findings from think-aloud interviews with stakeholders guided the final adaptations. The data was analysed using the framework method.

Results: The combined findings from the literature, stakeholder audit trails and interviews showed consensus that nature films with auditory stimuli were acceptable for inducing relaxation and distraction in critically ill patients, with few or no adverse effects. A key uncertainty regarding virtual reality's effect on delirium or its potential role in delirium development affected nurses' acceptability of virtual reality, highlighting a need to consider this risk.

Conclusions: This intervention identification, adaptation, acceptability and feasibility study concludes that virtual reality for relaxation and distraction is an acceptable intervention in the intensive care unit setting. The identified and adapted virtual reality software intervention was a 10-min 360-degree natural beach film combined with nature sounds and calming music. The identified hardware intervention was a headset connected to a tablet, enabling nurses to control the software. A subsequent study should examine the preliminary short effectiveness and adapt the intervention according to the further findings.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered in Open Science Framework 14 Feb 2024. Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BYZ42 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信