{"title":"临床耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌暴露于达托霉素、特拉万和万古霉素后骨和关节感染的体外持久性","authors":"Aliaa Fouad, Joseph L Kuti, Christian M Gill","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.01576-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bacterial persistence is linked to chronic infections caused by methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). Understanding the persister profiles of daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin is crucial because MRSA bone and joint infections (BJIs) are associated with recurrence and treatment failure. Persister formation was assessed using quantitative <i>in vitro</i> assays against six clinical BJI MRSA isolates and a quality control ATCC strain. Assays were performed using a mid-exponential phase of bacteria challenged with steady-state drug concentrations of the three agents. Persisters were quantified as the percent survival quantifiable at 24 h compared with the respective control. Persisters were also quantified after three serial passages of daptomycin pre-exposure. The percent survival identified at 24 h was ≤21.7% with no significant differences between daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin in quantitative persister assays without daptomycin pre-exposure. After 3 days of <i>in vitro</i> daptomycin pre-exposure, the 24 h percent survival significantly increased compared with no pre-exposure in two isolates for the daptomycin group (100% vs 1% and 4.8% vs 0.2%, respectively). The 24 h percent persister was significantly higher in daptomycin compared with vancomycin and telavancin in four isolates. There was no significant increase in 24 h percent persister for telavancin and vancomycin after daptomycin pre-exposure. Daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin resulted in similar bacterial survival at 24 h at clinically achievable concentrations. Daptomycin pre-exposure did not alter persistence for telavancin and vancomycin. Considering differences in persister generation, further clinical studies are justified to help differentiate these anti-MRSA agents in the treatment of MRSA BJIs.IMPORTANCEBacterial persistence has been associated with relapsing infections, including infections caused by MRSA. Chronic infections, such as bone and joint infections, are associated with high rates of recurrence, and persistence may play a role. Although daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin are widely used for the treatment of bone and joint infections, their persister potential has not been assessed under the same experimental conditions. The present study sought to assess the <i>in vitro</i> persister potential of daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin against clinical MRSA from bone and joint infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0157625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In vitro</i> persistence of clinical methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> isolates from bone and joint infections after exposure to daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin.\",\"authors\":\"Aliaa Fouad, Joseph L Kuti, Christian M Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.01576-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bacterial persistence is linked to chronic infections caused by methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). Understanding the persister profiles of daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin is crucial because MRSA bone and joint infections (BJIs) are associated with recurrence and treatment failure. Persister formation was assessed using quantitative <i>in vitro</i> assays against six clinical BJI MRSA isolates and a quality control ATCC strain. Assays were performed using a mid-exponential phase of bacteria challenged with steady-state drug concentrations of the three agents. Persisters were quantified as the percent survival quantifiable at 24 h compared with the respective control. Persisters were also quantified after three serial passages of daptomycin pre-exposure. The percent survival identified at 24 h was ≤21.7% with no significant differences between daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin in quantitative persister assays without daptomycin pre-exposure. After 3 days of <i>in vitro</i> daptomycin pre-exposure, the 24 h percent survival significantly increased compared with no pre-exposure in two isolates for the daptomycin group (100% vs 1% and 4.8% vs 0.2%, respectively). The 24 h percent persister was significantly higher in daptomycin compared with vancomycin and telavancin in four isolates. There was no significant increase in 24 h percent persister for telavancin and vancomycin after daptomycin pre-exposure. Daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin resulted in similar bacterial survival at 24 h at clinically achievable concentrations. Daptomycin pre-exposure did not alter persistence for telavancin and vancomycin. Considering differences in persister generation, further clinical studies are justified to help differentiate these anti-MRSA agents in the treatment of MRSA BJIs.IMPORTANCEBacterial persistence has been associated with relapsing infections, including infections caused by MRSA. Chronic infections, such as bone and joint infections, are associated with high rates of recurrence, and persistence may play a role. Although daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin are widely used for the treatment of bone and joint infections, their persister potential has not been assessed under the same experimental conditions. The present study sought to assess the <i>in vitro</i> persister potential of daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin against clinical MRSA from bone and joint infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0157625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01576-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01576-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
细菌的持久性与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的慢性感染有关。了解达托霉素、特拉万和万古霉素的持久性是至关重要的,因为MRSA骨和关节感染(BJIs)与复发和治疗失败有关。对6株临床BJI MRSA分离株和1株质量对照ATCC菌株进行体外定量分析,评估持久性形成。使用三种药剂的稳态药物浓度挑战细菌的指数中期进行测定。与相应的对照相比,持续者被量化为24 h可量化的存活率。在连续三代达托霉素预暴露后,对持续者进行量化。在不预先暴露达托霉素的情况下,24小时的存活率≤21.7%,在定量持久性试验中,达托霉素、特拉万辛和万古霉素之间没有显著差异。在体外达托霉素预暴露3天后,两株达托霉素组的24小时存活率显著高于未预暴露组(分别为100% vs 1%和4.8% vs 0.2%)。在4个分离株中,达托霉素的24小时持久性显著高于万古霉素和特拉万素。在达托霉素预暴露后,替拉万和万古霉素的持续时间没有明显增加24%。在临床可达到的浓度下,达托霉素、替拉万古霉素和万古霉素在24小时内的细菌存活率相似。达托霉素预暴露不改变替拉万和万古霉素的持久性。考虑到持久性产生的差异,进一步的临床研究是有理由的,以帮助区分这些抗MRSA药物治疗MRSA BJIs。细菌的持续存在与反复感染有关,包括MRSA引起的感染。慢性感染,如骨和关节感染,与高复发率相关,并且持续性可能起作用。虽然达托霉素、特拉万辛和万古霉素被广泛用于治疗骨和关节感染,但在相同的实验条件下,它们的持续潜力尚未得到评估。本研究旨在评估达托霉素、特拉万和万古霉素对临床MRSA骨和关节感染的体外持久性潜力。
In vitro persistence of clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bone and joint infections after exposure to daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin.
Bacterial persistence is linked to chronic infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Understanding the persister profiles of daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin is crucial because MRSA bone and joint infections (BJIs) are associated with recurrence and treatment failure. Persister formation was assessed using quantitative in vitro assays against six clinical BJI MRSA isolates and a quality control ATCC strain. Assays were performed using a mid-exponential phase of bacteria challenged with steady-state drug concentrations of the three agents. Persisters were quantified as the percent survival quantifiable at 24 h compared with the respective control. Persisters were also quantified after three serial passages of daptomycin pre-exposure. The percent survival identified at 24 h was ≤21.7% with no significant differences between daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin in quantitative persister assays without daptomycin pre-exposure. After 3 days of in vitro daptomycin pre-exposure, the 24 h percent survival significantly increased compared with no pre-exposure in two isolates for the daptomycin group (100% vs 1% and 4.8% vs 0.2%, respectively). The 24 h percent persister was significantly higher in daptomycin compared with vancomycin and telavancin in four isolates. There was no significant increase in 24 h percent persister for telavancin and vancomycin after daptomycin pre-exposure. Daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin resulted in similar bacterial survival at 24 h at clinically achievable concentrations. Daptomycin pre-exposure did not alter persistence for telavancin and vancomycin. Considering differences in persister generation, further clinical studies are justified to help differentiate these anti-MRSA agents in the treatment of MRSA BJIs.IMPORTANCEBacterial persistence has been associated with relapsing infections, including infections caused by MRSA. Chronic infections, such as bone and joint infections, are associated with high rates of recurrence, and persistence may play a role. Although daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin are widely used for the treatment of bone and joint infections, their persister potential has not been assessed under the same experimental conditions. The present study sought to assess the in vitro persister potential of daptomycin, telavancin, and vancomycin against clinical MRSA from bone and joint infections.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.