在许多动物物种中,皮肤微生物组的组装比肠道微生物组更中性。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Killian D Campbell, Brendan J M Bohannan, Karen L Adair
{"title":"在许多动物物种中,皮肤微生物组的组装比肠道微生物组更中性。","authors":"Killian D Campbell, Brendan J M Bohannan, Karen L Adair","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02223-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gut and external tissues of most animals are colonized by communities of microorganisms that can influence the health, development, and fitness of the host. The composition of these communities can vary greatly between individuals within a host species, and both selective factors (e.g., host immune response) and neutral processes (e.g., random loss of microbial cells) have been shown to contribute to this variation. Although it is known that microbiome composition differs between tissues within an individual host, less is known about the ecological processes that underlie these differences. To address this, we investigated whether the contribution of neutral ecological processes to microbiome assembly differs between external (skin and scale) and internal (gut) host tissues for a diverse panel of animal hosts. To do this, we fit a neutral ecological model to microbial communities from external and internal tissues across a variety of animal hosts. Strikingly, we discovered that the neutral model was equally or a better fit to skin or scale microbial communities across all hosts, suggesting that neutral processes play a larger role in the assembly of skin or scale microbiomes compared with gut microbiomes. Furthermore, we observed that this trend is robust to different definitions of the metacommunity (i.e., the microbial taxa available to colonize a host). Finally, we leveraged a simulation framework to compare the model fits of empirical versus simulated microbial communities. We found that neutral model fits to empirical communities can differ from simulated communities, emphasizing the importance of temporal sampling in profiling animal microbiomes.IMPORTANCEAnimal microbiomes are complex assemblages of microorganisms that influence a wide variety of host phenotypes. Despite their importance, we lack a thorough understanding of the processes that guide the formation of microbiomes (i.e., microbiome assembly). Understanding how microbiomes assemble is essential to managing microbiomes for host health, conservation, and other goals. Our work highlights the relatively underappreciated role of neutral ecological processes (the random loss or gain of microbial cells) in the assembly of animal microbiomes. We document a potentially general trend: the microbiomes of external tissues (i.e., skin or scales) tend to be more neutrally assembled than those of internal tissues (i.e., guts). This observation suggests that the commonly reported differences in microbiome composition of external and internal animal tissues may be due in part to different assembly processes. Our work also highlights the dynamic nature of microbiomes and the importance of longitudinal sampling when studying animal microbiomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0222325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assembly of skin microbiomes is more neutral than gut microbiomes in multiple animal species.\",\"authors\":\"Killian D Campbell, Brendan J M Bohannan, Karen L Adair\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.02223-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gut and external tissues of most animals are colonized by communities of microorganisms that can influence the health, development, and fitness of the host. The composition of these communities can vary greatly between individuals within a host species, and both selective factors (e.g., host immune response) and neutral processes (e.g., random loss of microbial cells) have been shown to contribute to this variation. Although it is known that microbiome composition differs between tissues within an individual host, less is known about the ecological processes that underlie these differences. To address this, we investigated whether the contribution of neutral ecological processes to microbiome assembly differs between external (skin and scale) and internal (gut) host tissues for a diverse panel of animal hosts. To do this, we fit a neutral ecological model to microbial communities from external and internal tissues across a variety of animal hosts. Strikingly, we discovered that the neutral model was equally or a better fit to skin or scale microbial communities across all hosts, suggesting that neutral processes play a larger role in the assembly of skin or scale microbiomes compared with gut microbiomes. Furthermore, we observed that this trend is robust to different definitions of the metacommunity (i.e., the microbial taxa available to colonize a host). Finally, we leveraged a simulation framework to compare the model fits of empirical versus simulated microbial communities. We found that neutral model fits to empirical communities can differ from simulated communities, emphasizing the importance of temporal sampling in profiling animal microbiomes.IMPORTANCEAnimal microbiomes are complex assemblages of microorganisms that influence a wide variety of host phenotypes. Despite their importance, we lack a thorough understanding of the processes that guide the formation of microbiomes (i.e., microbiome assembly). Understanding how microbiomes assemble is essential to managing microbiomes for host health, conservation, and other goals. Our work highlights the relatively underappreciated role of neutral ecological processes (the random loss or gain of microbial cells) in the assembly of animal microbiomes. We document a potentially general trend: the microbiomes of external tissues (i.e., skin or scales) tend to be more neutrally assembled than those of internal tissues (i.e., guts). This observation suggests that the commonly reported differences in microbiome composition of external and internal animal tissues may be due in part to different assembly processes. Our work also highlights the dynamic nature of microbiomes and the importance of longitudinal sampling when studying animal microbiomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0222325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02223-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02223-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数动物的肠道和外部组织都有微生物群落定植,这些微生物群落可以影响宿主的健康、发育和适应性。这些群落的组成在宿主物种内的个体之间可能有很大差异,选择性因素(例如,宿主免疫反应)和中性过程(例如,微生物细胞的随机损失)已被证明有助于这种差异。虽然已知单个宿主体内不同组织的微生物组组成不同,但对这些差异背后的生态过程知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了不同动物宿主的外部(皮肤和鳞片)和内部(肠道)宿主组织中中性生态过程对微生物组组装的贡献是否不同。为了做到这一点,我们将一个中性的生态模型适用于各种动物宿主的外部和内部组织的微生物群落。引人注目的是,我们发现中性模型同样或更好地适合所有宿主的皮肤或规模微生物群落,这表明与肠道微生物组相比,中性过程在皮肤或规模微生物组的组装中起着更大的作用。此外,我们观察到这种趋势对元群落(即可定殖宿主的微生物分类群)的不同定义是稳健的。最后,我们利用模拟框架来比较经验与模拟微生物群落的模型拟合。我们发现中性模型与经验群落的拟合可能不同于模拟群落,强调了时间采样在分析动物微生物组中的重要性。动物微生物组是影响多种宿主表型的微生物的复杂组合。尽管它们很重要,但我们对指导微生物组形成的过程(即微生物组组装)缺乏透彻的了解。了解微生物群如何聚集对于管理微生物群以促进宿主健康、保护和其他目标至关重要。我们的工作强调了中性生态过程(微生物细胞的随机损失或获得)在动物微生物组组装中的相对被低估的作用。我们记录了一个潜在的总体趋势:外部组织(即皮肤或鳞片)的微生物组往往比内部组织(即肠道)的微生物组更中性。这一观察结果表明,通常报道的动物组织外部和内部微生物组组成的差异可能部分是由于不同的组装过程。我们的工作还强调了微生物组的动态性质和纵向采样在研究动物微生物组时的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assembly of skin microbiomes is more neutral than gut microbiomes in multiple animal species.

The gut and external tissues of most animals are colonized by communities of microorganisms that can influence the health, development, and fitness of the host. The composition of these communities can vary greatly between individuals within a host species, and both selective factors (e.g., host immune response) and neutral processes (e.g., random loss of microbial cells) have been shown to contribute to this variation. Although it is known that microbiome composition differs between tissues within an individual host, less is known about the ecological processes that underlie these differences. To address this, we investigated whether the contribution of neutral ecological processes to microbiome assembly differs between external (skin and scale) and internal (gut) host tissues for a diverse panel of animal hosts. To do this, we fit a neutral ecological model to microbial communities from external and internal tissues across a variety of animal hosts. Strikingly, we discovered that the neutral model was equally or a better fit to skin or scale microbial communities across all hosts, suggesting that neutral processes play a larger role in the assembly of skin or scale microbiomes compared with gut microbiomes. Furthermore, we observed that this trend is robust to different definitions of the metacommunity (i.e., the microbial taxa available to colonize a host). Finally, we leveraged a simulation framework to compare the model fits of empirical versus simulated microbial communities. We found that neutral model fits to empirical communities can differ from simulated communities, emphasizing the importance of temporal sampling in profiling animal microbiomes.IMPORTANCEAnimal microbiomes are complex assemblages of microorganisms that influence a wide variety of host phenotypes. Despite their importance, we lack a thorough understanding of the processes that guide the formation of microbiomes (i.e., microbiome assembly). Understanding how microbiomes assemble is essential to managing microbiomes for host health, conservation, and other goals. Our work highlights the relatively underappreciated role of neutral ecological processes (the random loss or gain of microbial cells) in the assembly of animal microbiomes. We document a potentially general trend: the microbiomes of external tissues (i.e., skin or scales) tend to be more neutrally assembled than those of internal tissues (i.e., guts). This observation suggests that the commonly reported differences in microbiome composition of external and internal animal tissues may be due in part to different assembly processes. Our work also highlights the dynamic nature of microbiomes and the importance of longitudinal sampling when studying animal microbiomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信