基于肠促胰岛素的药物与2型糖尿病患者痴呆的风险

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yun-Han Wang, Kyle Johnson, Sarah Beradid, Hui Yin, Oriana H Y Yu, Samy Suissa, Laurent Azoulay, Christel Renoux
{"title":"基于肠促胰岛素的药物与2型糖尿病患者痴呆的风险","authors":"Yun-Han Wang, Kyle Johnson, Sarah Beradid, Hui Yin, Oriana H Y Yu, Samy Suissa, Laurent Azoulay, Christel Renoux","doi":"10.1007/s40264-025-01623-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incretin-based drugs, namely glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, may have neuroprotective effects. Thus, we assessed whether these drugs are associated with a decreased risk of dementia among patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from the UK, we formed two new user cohorts of patients at least 50 years of age with type 2 diabetes starting incretin-based drugs or sulfonylureas between 2007 and 2021. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dementia were estimated separately for GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors using Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine-stratification weighting and inverse probability of censoring weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 275,144 initiators of DPP-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas, followed for 750,846 person-years, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a reduced dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas (4.4 vs. 5.7 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.85). HRs decreased with increasing cumulative duration of use and dose. Similar associations were observed across dementia subtypes and individual DPP-4 inhibitors molecules. Among 181,215 initiators of GLP-1 RAs or sulfonylureas, followed for 530,415 person-years, GLP-1 RAs were associated with a similar reduction in dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas, although with high uncertainty (2.3 vs. 3.1 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.46-1.18). The magnitude of the association increased with cumulative duration of use and dose but with high uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this population-based study, DPP-4 inhibitors, and possibly GLP-1 RAs, were associated with a reduced dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incretin-Based Drugs and the Risk of Dementia Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Han Wang, Kyle Johnson, Sarah Beradid, Hui Yin, Oriana H Y Yu, Samy Suissa, Laurent Azoulay, Christel Renoux\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40264-025-01623-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incretin-based drugs, namely glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, may have neuroprotective effects. Thus, we assessed whether these drugs are associated with a decreased risk of dementia among patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from the UK, we formed two new user cohorts of patients at least 50 years of age with type 2 diabetes starting incretin-based drugs or sulfonylureas between 2007 and 2021. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dementia were estimated separately for GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors using Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine-stratification weighting and inverse probability of censoring weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 275,144 initiators of DPP-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas, followed for 750,846 person-years, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a reduced dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas (4.4 vs. 5.7 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.85). HRs decreased with increasing cumulative duration of use and dose. Similar associations were observed across dementia subtypes and individual DPP-4 inhibitors molecules. Among 181,215 initiators of GLP-1 RAs or sulfonylureas, followed for 530,415 person-years, GLP-1 RAs were associated with a similar reduction in dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas, although with high uncertainty (2.3 vs. 3.1 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.46-1.18). The magnitude of the association increased with cumulative duration of use and dose but with high uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this population-based study, DPP-4 inhibitors, and possibly GLP-1 RAs, were associated with a reduced dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-025-01623-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-025-01623-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以肠促胰岛素为基础的药物,即胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)和二肽基肽酶4 (DPP-4)抑制剂,可能具有神经保护作用。因此,我们评估了这些药物是否与降低2型糖尿病患者痴呆风险有关。方法:使用来自英国的临床实践研究数据链,我们在2007年至2021年期间形成了两个新的50岁以上的2型糖尿病患者用户队列,这些患者开始使用基于肠素的药物或磺脲类药物。使用Cox比例风险模型,分别估计GLP-1 RAs和DPP-4抑制剂的痴呆风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(CIs),该模型具有倾向评分精细分层加权和反向审查权重的概率。结果:在275,144名DPP-4抑制剂或磺脲类药物的启动者中,随访750,846人年,与磺脲类药物相比,DPP-4抑制剂与痴呆风险降低相关(4.4 vs 5.7事件/ 1000人年;HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.85)。hr随累积用药时间和剂量的增加而降低。在痴呆亚型和个体DPP-4抑制剂分子中观察到类似的关联。在181,215名GLP-1 RAs或磺酰脲类药物的起始者中,随访530,415人年,与磺酰脲类药物相比,GLP-1 RAs与痴呆风险降低相似,尽管存在很高的不确定性(每1000人年2.3 vs 3.1事件;HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.46-1.18)。相关性的大小随累积用药时间和剂量的增加而增加,但具有很高的不确定性。结论:在这项基于人群的研究中,与磺脲类药物相比,DPP-4抑制剂,可能还有GLP-1 RAs,与降低痴呆风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incretin-Based Drugs and the Risk of Dementia Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Background: Incretin-based drugs, namely glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, may have neuroprotective effects. Thus, we assessed whether these drugs are associated with a decreased risk of dementia among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from the UK, we formed two new user cohorts of patients at least 50 years of age with type 2 diabetes starting incretin-based drugs or sulfonylureas between 2007 and 2021. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dementia were estimated separately for GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors using Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score fine-stratification weighting and inverse probability of censoring weights.

Results: Among 275,144 initiators of DPP-4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas, followed for 750,846 person-years, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a reduced dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas (4.4 vs. 5.7 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.85). HRs decreased with increasing cumulative duration of use and dose. Similar associations were observed across dementia subtypes and individual DPP-4 inhibitors molecules. Among 181,215 initiators of GLP-1 RAs or sulfonylureas, followed for 530,415 person-years, GLP-1 RAs were associated with a similar reduction in dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas, although with high uncertainty (2.3 vs. 3.1 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.46-1.18). The magnitude of the association increased with cumulative duration of use and dose but with high uncertainty.

Conclusions: In this population-based study, DPP-4 inhibitors, and possibly GLP-1 RAs, were associated with a reduced dementia risk compared with sulfonylureas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信