超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞与肋间菱形锯下肌平面阻滞用于开放性根治性肾切除术术后镇痛的随机临床研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Doaa Abd Eltwab, Sayed M Abed, Ahmad Saad, Maha A Abdel Aliem, Khaled A Elsamahy, Fatma H Elshamy, Ahmed F Gad, Walaa Y Elsabeeny
{"title":"超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞与肋间菱形锯下肌平面阻滞用于开放性根治性肾切除术术后镇痛的随机临床研究。","authors":"Doaa Abd Eltwab, Sayed M Abed, Ahmad Saad, Maha A Abdel Aliem, Khaled A Elsamahy, Fatma H Elshamy, Ahmed F Gad, Walaa Y Elsabeeny","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03377-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open radical nephrectomy often results in significant acute postoperative pain. Regional anesthesia offers an alternative analgesic approach in these situations. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus (RISS) block with Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial included 42 patients scheduled for open radical nephrectomy (RN). Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the ESPB Group (n = 21), which received an ESPB with 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, or the RISS Group (n = 21), which received a RISS block with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%. Total morphine consumption was set as the primary outcome while pain scores, perioperative hemodynamics and time to postoperative analgesia were considered as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total morphine consumption within the first 24 postoperative hours was significantly lower for the ESPB group (16.4 ± 2.5 mg) compared to the RISS group (18.2 ± 1.8 mg), p = 0.011. VAS pain scores at rest were significantly lower in the ESPB group at 12 and 18 h (p = 0.002, p = 0.018) respectively. VAS scores with movement were significantly lower for the ESPB group at 8 h,12 h, and 18 h (p = 0.011, p = 0.001, and p = 0.018 respectively). The first time to receive postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the ESPB group (7.3 ± 2.1 h) than in the RISS group (6.0 ± 2.1 h), p = 0.048. Both groups were comparable in the number of PCA boluses, the number of patients requiring intraoperative fentanyl increments, or recovery time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided ESPB provides slightly superior postoperative analgesia compared with RISS block in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy via subcostal anterior incision for renal malignancies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at Clinical Trials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05822011 , trial ID (NCT05822011, 14 March 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus plane block for postoperative analgesia in open radical nephrectomy: a randomized clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Doaa Abd Eltwab, Sayed M Abed, Ahmad Saad, Maha A Abdel Aliem, Khaled A Elsamahy, Fatma H Elshamy, Ahmed F Gad, Walaa Y Elsabeeny\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03377-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Open radical nephrectomy often results in significant acute postoperative pain. Regional anesthesia offers an alternative analgesic approach in these situations. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus (RISS) block with Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial included 42 patients scheduled for open radical nephrectomy (RN). Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the ESPB Group (n = 21), which received an ESPB with 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, or the RISS Group (n = 21), which received a RISS block with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%. Total morphine consumption was set as the primary outcome while pain scores, perioperative hemodynamics and time to postoperative analgesia were considered as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total morphine consumption within the first 24 postoperative hours was significantly lower for the ESPB group (16.4 ± 2.5 mg) compared to the RISS group (18.2 ± 1.8 mg), p = 0.011. VAS pain scores at rest were significantly lower in the ESPB group at 12 and 18 h (p = 0.002, p = 0.018) respectively. VAS scores with movement were significantly lower for the ESPB group at 8 h,12 h, and 18 h (p = 0.011, p = 0.001, and p = 0.018 respectively). The first time to receive postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the ESPB group (7.3 ± 2.1 h) than in the RISS group (6.0 ± 2.1 h), p = 0.048. Both groups were comparable in the number of PCA boluses, the number of patients requiring intraoperative fentanyl increments, or recovery time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided ESPB provides slightly superior postoperative analgesia compared with RISS block in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy via subcostal anterior incision for renal malignancies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered at Clinical Trials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05822011 , trial ID (NCT05822011, 14 March 2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03377-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03377-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开放性根治性肾切除术常导致术后急性疼痛。在这些情况下,区域麻醉提供了另一种镇痛方法。本研究旨在评估和比较超声引导下菱形肋下锯肌(RISS)阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在开放性根治性肾切除术患者中的效果。方法:本随机临床试验纳入42例计划行开放性根治性肾切除术(RN)的患者。患者被随机分配到两组中的一组:ESPB组(n = 21),接受含有30ml 0.25%布比卡因的ESPB,或RISS组(n = 21),接受含有30ml 0.25%布比卡因的RISS阻滞。吗啡总用量为主要结局,疼痛评分、围手术期血流动力学和术后镇痛时间为次要结局。结果:ESPB组术后24 h吗啡总用量(16.4±2.5 mg)明显低于RISS组(18.2±1.8 mg), p = 0.011。ESPB组休息时VAS疼痛评分分别在12和18 h显著低于对照组(p = 0.002, p = 0.018)。ESPB组患者在8 h、12 h、18 h的运动VAS评分显著低于对照组(p = 0.011、p = 0.001、p = 0.018)。ESPB组术后首次镇痛时间(7.3±2.1 h)明显长于RISS组(6.0±2.1 h), p = 0.048。两组在PCA剂量、术中需要芬太尼增加的患者数量或恢复时间方面具有可比性。结论:超声引导下ESPB对经肋下前切口行开放性根治性肾切除术患者的术后镇痛效果略优于RISS阻滞。试验注册:该试验已在Clinical Trials.gov上注册。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05822011,试验ID (NCT05822011, 2023年3月14日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus plane block for postoperative analgesia in open radical nephrectomy: a randomized clinical study.

Background: Open radical nephrectomy often results in significant acute postoperative pain. Regional anesthesia offers an alternative analgesic approach in these situations. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal sub-serratus (RISS) block with Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 42 patients scheduled for open radical nephrectomy (RN). Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the ESPB Group (n = 21), which received an ESPB with 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, or the RISS Group (n = 21), which received a RISS block with 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%. Total morphine consumption was set as the primary outcome while pain scores, perioperative hemodynamics and time to postoperative analgesia were considered as secondary outcomes.

Results: Total morphine consumption within the first 24 postoperative hours was significantly lower for the ESPB group (16.4 ± 2.5 mg) compared to the RISS group (18.2 ± 1.8 mg), p = 0.011. VAS pain scores at rest were significantly lower in the ESPB group at 12 and 18 h (p = 0.002, p = 0.018) respectively. VAS scores with movement were significantly lower for the ESPB group at 8 h,12 h, and 18 h (p = 0.011, p = 0.001, and p = 0.018 respectively). The first time to receive postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the ESPB group (7.3 ± 2.1 h) than in the RISS group (6.0 ± 2.1 h), p = 0.048. Both groups were comparable in the number of PCA boluses, the number of patients requiring intraoperative fentanyl increments, or recovery time.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided ESPB provides slightly superior postoperative analgesia compared with RISS block in patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy via subcostal anterior incision for renal malignancies.

Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinical Trials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05822011 , trial ID (NCT05822011, 14 March 2023).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信