Ali Genç, Sezer Astan, Mehtap Gürler Balta, Vildan Kölükçü, Ahmet Tuğrul Şahin, Hakan Tapar, Tuğba Karaman, Serkan Karaman
{"title":"脊柱麻醉与全身麻醉下全膝关节置换术中全身炎症标志物的比较:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Ali Genç, Sezer Astan, Mehtap Gürler Balta, Vildan Kölükçü, Ahmet Tuğrul Şahin, Hakan Tapar, Tuğba Karaman, Serkan Karaman","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03399-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), both surgical trauma and the type of anesthesia administered can significantly affect systemic inflammation, which may influence postoperative recovery. This retrospective study aimed to compare perioperative changes in blood-derived systemic inflammatory markers-specifically the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI)-in patients undergoing TKA under general versus spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 849 patients who underwent elective primary TKA between January 2020 and April 2025. Inclusion criteria were age 18-75 years and ASA physical status I-II. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², ASA ≥ III, major comorbidities, active infection, revision surgery, or incomplete lab data were excluded. Patients were categorized into spinal anesthesia (Group S) and general anesthesia (Group G) groups. Pre- and postoperative hemograms were used to calculate SII and SIRI values; ΔSII and ΔSIRI were defined as absolute differences. Groups were compared in terms of inflammatory markers, total opioid requirement, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Group comparability regarding age, ASA, and comorbidities was assessed, and multivariate linear regression models were applied to evaluate predictors of ΔSII and ΔSIRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 849 patients were included in the study. The median ΔSII value was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group [Group G: 1448.47 (IQR: 677.78-2670.86)] compared to the spinal anesthesia group [Group S: 1060.75 (IQR: 463.69-2093.28); p < 0.001]. Similarly, the ΔSIRI value was higher in Group G [4.56 (IQR: 2.31-9.23)] than in Group S [3.69 (IQR: 1.70-7.05); p = 0.002]. The total opioid requirement within the first 24 postoperative hours was also significantly greater in Group G (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of postoperative complication rates (p = 0.48) or length of hospital stay (p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower postoperative increase in systemic inflammatory blood markers in patients undergoing TKA. While no difference was observed in short-term clinical outcomes, these findings suggest that spinal anesthesia may offer an immunological advantage. Given the retrospective nature of the study, prospective research is warranted to determine whether these biomarker differences have meaningful clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of systemic inflammatory markers in total knee arthroplasty under spinal vs general anesthesia: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Genç, Sezer Astan, Mehtap Gürler Balta, Vildan Kölükçü, Ahmet Tuğrul Şahin, Hakan Tapar, Tuğba Karaman, Serkan Karaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03399-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), both surgical trauma and the type of anesthesia administered can significantly affect systemic inflammation, which may influence postoperative recovery. This retrospective study aimed to compare perioperative changes in blood-derived systemic inflammatory markers-specifically the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI)-in patients undergoing TKA under general versus spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 849 patients who underwent elective primary TKA between January 2020 and April 2025. Inclusion criteria were age 18-75 years and ASA physical status I-II. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², ASA ≥ III, major comorbidities, active infection, revision surgery, or incomplete lab data were excluded. Patients were categorized into spinal anesthesia (Group S) and general anesthesia (Group G) groups. Pre- and postoperative hemograms were used to calculate SII and SIRI values; ΔSII and ΔSIRI were defined as absolute differences. Groups were compared in terms of inflammatory markers, total opioid requirement, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Group comparability regarding age, ASA, and comorbidities was assessed, and multivariate linear regression models were applied to evaluate predictors of ΔSII and ΔSIRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 849 patients were included in the study. The median ΔSII value was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group [Group G: 1448.47 (IQR: 677.78-2670.86)] compared to the spinal anesthesia group [Group S: 1060.75 (IQR: 463.69-2093.28); p < 0.001]. Similarly, the ΔSIRI value was higher in Group G [4.56 (IQR: 2.31-9.23)] than in Group S [3.69 (IQR: 1.70-7.05); p = 0.002]. The total opioid requirement within the first 24 postoperative hours was also significantly greater in Group G (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of postoperative complication rates (p = 0.48) or length of hospital stay (p = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower postoperative increase in systemic inflammatory blood markers in patients undergoing TKA. While no difference was observed in short-term clinical outcomes, these findings suggest that spinal anesthesia may offer an immunological advantage. Given the retrospective nature of the study, prospective research is warranted to determine whether these biomarker differences have meaningful clinical implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03399-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03399-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of systemic inflammatory markers in total knee arthroplasty under spinal vs general anesthesia: a retrospective study.
Purpose: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), both surgical trauma and the type of anesthesia administered can significantly affect systemic inflammation, which may influence postoperative recovery. This retrospective study aimed to compare perioperative changes in blood-derived systemic inflammatory markers-specifically the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI)-in patients undergoing TKA under general versus spinal anesthesia.
Methods: This retrospective analysis included 849 patients who underwent elective primary TKA between January 2020 and April 2025. Inclusion criteria were age 18-75 years and ASA physical status I-II. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², ASA ≥ III, major comorbidities, active infection, revision surgery, or incomplete lab data were excluded. Patients were categorized into spinal anesthesia (Group S) and general anesthesia (Group G) groups. Pre- and postoperative hemograms were used to calculate SII and SIRI values; ΔSII and ΔSIRI were defined as absolute differences. Groups were compared in terms of inflammatory markers, total opioid requirement, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Group comparability regarding age, ASA, and comorbidities was assessed, and multivariate linear regression models were applied to evaluate predictors of ΔSII and ΔSIRI.
Results: A total of 849 patients were included in the study. The median ΔSII value was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group [Group G: 1448.47 (IQR: 677.78-2670.86)] compared to the spinal anesthesia group [Group S: 1060.75 (IQR: 463.69-2093.28); p < 0.001]. Similarly, the ΔSIRI value was higher in Group G [4.56 (IQR: 2.31-9.23)] than in Group S [3.69 (IQR: 1.70-7.05); p = 0.002]. The total opioid requirement within the first 24 postoperative hours was also significantly greater in Group G (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of postoperative complication rates (p = 0.48) or length of hospital stay (p = 0.18).
Conclusion: Compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower postoperative increase in systemic inflammatory blood markers in patients undergoing TKA. While no difference was observed in short-term clinical outcomes, these findings suggest that spinal anesthesia may offer an immunological advantage. Given the retrospective nature of the study, prospective research is warranted to determine whether these biomarker differences have meaningful clinical implications.
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.