{"title":"右美托咪定雾化治疗剖宫产后硬膜穿刺后头痛:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yanyan Yang, Hong Tang, Fuhai Bai","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03339-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited effective non-invasive treatment options for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following cesarean delivery. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nebulized dexmedetomidine in treating PDPH after cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were systematically searched from the inception to March 2025. Primary outcomes included pain scores based on the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included the need for epidural blood patch (EBP) and adverse events, such as bradycardia and dry mouth. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool was employed to assess the quality of the included studies, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four randomized controlled trials with 228 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to participants in the control group who received saline or fentanyl, patients with PDPH who received nebulized dexmedetomidine following cesarean delivery exhibited lower pain scores at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the intervention. The quality of evidence ranged from 'very low' to 'moderate'. The nebulized dexmedetomidine group less frequently needed EBP compared to the control group, while there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nebulized dexmedetomidine is a promising non-invasive option for managing PDPH in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. It effectively reduces pain intensity and decreases the need for invasive procedures, such as epidural blood patches, with an acceptable safety profile. This nebulized delivery method may offer practical advantages over traditional systemic approaches, particularly in the postpartum setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>We registered this network meta-analysis with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD420251016279).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nebulized dexmedetomidine for post-dural puncture headache after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yanyan Yang, Hong Tang, Fuhai Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03339-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited effective non-invasive treatment options for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following cesarean delivery. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nebulized dexmedetomidine in treating PDPH after cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were systematically searched from the inception to March 2025. Primary outcomes included pain scores based on the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included the need for epidural blood patch (EBP) and adverse events, such as bradycardia and dry mouth. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool was employed to assess the quality of the included studies, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four randomized controlled trials with 228 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to participants in the control group who received saline or fentanyl, patients with PDPH who received nebulized dexmedetomidine following cesarean delivery exhibited lower pain scores at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the intervention. The quality of evidence ranged from 'very low' to 'moderate'. The nebulized dexmedetomidine group less frequently needed EBP compared to the control group, while there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nebulized dexmedetomidine is a promising non-invasive option for managing PDPH in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. It effectively reduces pain intensity and decreases the need for invasive procedures, such as epidural blood patches, with an acceptable safety profile. This nebulized delivery method may offer practical advantages over traditional systemic approaches, particularly in the postpartum setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>We registered this network meta-analysis with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD420251016279).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03339-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03339-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:剖宫产后硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)的有效无创治疗方案有限。本荟萃分析旨在探讨雾化右美托咪定治疗剖宫产后PDPH的疗效和安全性。方法:系统检索自成立至2025年3月的电子数据库。主要结果包括干预后6、12、24、48和72 h基于数值评定量表(NRS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的疼痛评分。次要结局包括是否需要硬膜外补血(EBP)和不良事件,如心动过缓和口干。采用Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2)工具评估纳入研究的质量,并采用分级推荐评估、发展和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。结果:四项随机对照试验纳入了228例患者。与接受生理盐水或芬太尼治疗的对照组相比,剖宫产后接受右美托咪定雾化治疗的PDPH患者在干预后6、12、24、48和72小时的疼痛评分较低。证据质量从“非常低”到“中等”不等。雾化右美托咪定组与对照组相比,需要EBP的次数较少,两组不良反应无显著差异。结论:雾化右美托咪定是一种很有前途的无创治疗剖宫产患者PDPH的选择。它有效地降低了疼痛强度,减少了侵入性手术的需要,如硬膜外血贴,具有可接受的安全性。这种雾化输送方法可能比传统的系统方法提供实际优势,特别是在产后设置。试验注册:我们在PROSPERO注册了这一网络荟萃分析(注册号:CRD420251016279)。
Nebulized dexmedetomidine for post-dural puncture headache after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: There are limited effective non-invasive treatment options for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following cesarean delivery. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nebulized dexmedetomidine in treating PDPH after cesarean delivery.
Methods: Electronic databases were systematically searched from the inception to March 2025. Primary outcomes included pain scores based on the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included the need for epidural blood patch (EBP) and adverse events, such as bradycardia and dry mouth. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool was employed to assess the quality of the included studies, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Results: Four randomized controlled trials with 228 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to participants in the control group who received saline or fentanyl, patients with PDPH who received nebulized dexmedetomidine following cesarean delivery exhibited lower pain scores at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the intervention. The quality of evidence ranged from 'very low' to 'moderate'. The nebulized dexmedetomidine group less frequently needed EBP compared to the control group, while there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of adverse effects.
Conclusion: Nebulized dexmedetomidine is a promising non-invasive option for managing PDPH in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. It effectively reduces pain intensity and decreases the need for invasive procedures, such as epidural blood patches, with an acceptable safety profile. This nebulized delivery method may offer practical advantages over traditional systemic approaches, particularly in the postpartum setting.
Trial registration: We registered this network meta-analysis with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD420251016279).
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.