德国育肥猪大肠杆菌的抗微生物药物耐药性流行率在地方国家水平有所不同。

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Maike Richter, Michael Weber, Timo Homeier-Bachmann, Carina Leitner, Susanne Amler, Carsten Heydel, Christa Ewers, Christian Berens, Christian Menge
{"title":"德国育肥猪大肠杆菌的抗微生物药物耐药性流行率在地方国家水平有所不同。","authors":"Maike Richter, Michael Weber, Timo Homeier-Bachmann, Carina Leitner, Susanne Amler, Carsten Heydel, Christa Ewers, Christian Berens, Christian Menge","doi":"10.1128/aem.00878-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Union aggregates surveillance data for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in livestock at the member state level. However, data evaluated nationally do not allow regionalized risk assessment and reactions. In an attempt to estimate the magnitude and granularity of regional differences, we collected AMR data for <i>Escherichia coli</i> by sampling fecal matter using boot swabs from vehicles carrying fattening pigs to an abattoir with a cross-regional catchment area. One <i>E. coli</i> strain was isolated per animal transport and its susceptibility to 14 antimicrobials was determined by broth microdilution. The minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained served to group the isolates into wild type (without a resistance phenotype) and non-wild type (with a resistance phenotype) using epidemiological cut-off values. Isolates were classified based on the origin of the respective transport into different levels of regionalization, using administrative as well as artificial borders, to obtain subnational AMR prevalence estimates for comparisons. The resistance prevalence of the total data set (<i>n</i> = 992) matched well with German data from national AMR surveillance. At all regional levels assessed, we detected significant differences for different compounds, including one highly significant difference for the veterinary antibiotic enrofloxacin. The antibiotics sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline, with resistance prevalence spanning 27.6%-52.4% and 18.8%-43.2%, respectively, most frequently showed significant differences in resistance prevalence. Our findings demonstrate that rapid sampling of animal transporters with boot swabs at a central node in the production chain and subsequent assignment of the regional source of the animals can serve as an approach to unveil existing subnational AMR prevalence differences with reasonable effort.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Surveillance is a key element of the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). With livestock representing a potential source for AMR transmission, its inclusion in surveillance programs is indispensable. Governmental surveillance of livestock in the European Union only depicts nationally aggregated AMR data. However, obtaining AMR data at subnational levels, although possibly laborious, is essential to gain insights into local situations. These may differ depending on the region surveyed, but their knowledge is essential for targeted risk assessment and interventions. Our study aimed at collecting such data while simultaneously testing a time-saving sampling approach. Hence, we sampled animal transporters carrying fattening pigs to an abattoir with boot swabs and determined AMR prevalence for <i>Escherichia coli</i> strains isolated thereof. The significant subnational differences in AMR prevalence detected indicate that regionalized surveillance data improve and hone the AMR knowledge base. Furthermore, our sampling approach was applicable with reasonable effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":8002,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0087825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial resistance prevalence in <i>Escherichia coli</i> from German fattening pigs differs at subnational levels.\",\"authors\":\"Maike Richter, Michael Weber, Timo Homeier-Bachmann, Carina Leitner, Susanne Amler, Carsten Heydel, Christa Ewers, Christian Berens, Christian Menge\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aem.00878-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The European Union aggregates surveillance data for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in livestock at the member state level. However, data evaluated nationally do not allow regionalized risk assessment and reactions. In an attempt to estimate the magnitude and granularity of regional differences, we collected AMR data for <i>Escherichia coli</i> by sampling fecal matter using boot swabs from vehicles carrying fattening pigs to an abattoir with a cross-regional catchment area. One <i>E. coli</i> strain was isolated per animal transport and its susceptibility to 14 antimicrobials was determined by broth microdilution. The minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained served to group the isolates into wild type (without a resistance phenotype) and non-wild type (with a resistance phenotype) using epidemiological cut-off values. Isolates were classified based on the origin of the respective transport into different levels of regionalization, using administrative as well as artificial borders, to obtain subnational AMR prevalence estimates for comparisons. The resistance prevalence of the total data set (<i>n</i> = 992) matched well with German data from national AMR surveillance. At all regional levels assessed, we detected significant differences for different compounds, including one highly significant difference for the veterinary antibiotic enrofloxacin. The antibiotics sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline, with resistance prevalence spanning 27.6%-52.4% and 18.8%-43.2%, respectively, most frequently showed significant differences in resistance prevalence. Our findings demonstrate that rapid sampling of animal transporters with boot swabs at a central node in the production chain and subsequent assignment of the regional source of the animals can serve as an approach to unveil existing subnational AMR prevalence differences with reasonable effort.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Surveillance is a key element of the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). With livestock representing a potential source for AMR transmission, its inclusion in surveillance programs is indispensable. Governmental surveillance of livestock in the European Union only depicts nationally aggregated AMR data. However, obtaining AMR data at subnational levels, although possibly laborious, is essential to gain insights into local situations. These may differ depending on the region surveyed, but their knowledge is essential for targeted risk assessment and interventions. Our study aimed at collecting such data while simultaneously testing a time-saving sampling approach. Hence, we sampled animal transporters carrying fattening pigs to an abattoir with boot swabs and determined AMR prevalence for <i>Escherichia coli</i> strains isolated thereof. The significant subnational differences in AMR prevalence detected indicate that regionalized surveillance data improve and hone the AMR knowledge base. Furthermore, our sampling approach was applicable with reasonable effort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied and Environmental Microbiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0087825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied and Environmental Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00878-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00878-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟在成员国一级汇总牲畜抗菌素耐药性(AMR)监测数据。然而,在全国范围内评估的数据不允许进行区域化的风险评估和反应。为了估计区域差异的大小和粒度,我们收集了大肠杆菌的抗菌素耐药性数据,方法是使用靴拭子从运送肥猪到跨区域集水区的屠宰场的车辆上取样粪便。每次动物运输分离1株大肠杆菌,用肉汤微量稀释法测定其对14种抗菌素的敏感性。获得的最低抑制浓度用于使用流行病学临界值将分离物分为野生型(无抗性表型)和非野生型(具有抗性表型)。利用行政边界和人工边界,根据各自的传播来源将分离物分类到不同的区域化水平,以获得次国家AMR流行率估算值进行比较。总数据集的耐药流行率(n = 992)与德国国家抗菌素耐药性监测数据吻合良好。在所有评估的区域水平上,我们检测到不同化合物的显著差异,包括兽用抗生素恩诺沙星的高度显著差异。抗生素磺胺甲恶唑和四环素的耐药率分别为27.6% ~ 52.4%和18.8% ~ 43.2%,最常见的耐药率差异显著。我们的研究结果表明,在生产链的中心节点用引导拭子对动物转运体进行快速采样,然后分配动物的区域来源,可以作为一种方法,通过合理的努力揭示现有的次国家AMR流行差异。重要性:监测是世界卫生组织抗微生物药物耐药性全球行动计划的一个关键要素。由于牲畜是AMR传播的潜在来源,因此将其纳入监测规划是必不可少的。在欧盟,政府对牲畜的监测只描述了国家总体的抗菌素耐药性数据。然而,在国家以下一级获取抗微生物药物耐药性数据,虽然可能很费力,但对于深入了解当地情况至关重要。这些情况可能因调查区域而异,但他们的知识对于有针对性的风险评估和干预至关重要。我们的研究旨在收集这些数据,同时测试一种节省时间的抽样方法。因此,我们对携带育肥猪前往屠宰场的动物转运者进行了取样,并对其中分离的大肠杆菌菌株进行了AMR流行率测定。检测到的抗菌素耐药性发病率的显著地方差异表明,区别化监测数据改善并完善了抗菌素耐药性知识库。此外,我们的抽样方法是适用的合理努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial resistance prevalence in Escherichia coli from German fattening pigs differs at subnational levels.

The European Union aggregates surveillance data for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in livestock at the member state level. However, data evaluated nationally do not allow regionalized risk assessment and reactions. In an attempt to estimate the magnitude and granularity of regional differences, we collected AMR data for Escherichia coli by sampling fecal matter using boot swabs from vehicles carrying fattening pigs to an abattoir with a cross-regional catchment area. One E. coli strain was isolated per animal transport and its susceptibility to 14 antimicrobials was determined by broth microdilution. The minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained served to group the isolates into wild type (without a resistance phenotype) and non-wild type (with a resistance phenotype) using epidemiological cut-off values. Isolates were classified based on the origin of the respective transport into different levels of regionalization, using administrative as well as artificial borders, to obtain subnational AMR prevalence estimates for comparisons. The resistance prevalence of the total data set (n = 992) matched well with German data from national AMR surveillance. At all regional levels assessed, we detected significant differences for different compounds, including one highly significant difference for the veterinary antibiotic enrofloxacin. The antibiotics sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline, with resistance prevalence spanning 27.6%-52.4% and 18.8%-43.2%, respectively, most frequently showed significant differences in resistance prevalence. Our findings demonstrate that rapid sampling of animal transporters with boot swabs at a central node in the production chain and subsequent assignment of the regional source of the animals can serve as an approach to unveil existing subnational AMR prevalence differences with reasonable effort.

Importance: Surveillance is a key element of the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). With livestock representing a potential source for AMR transmission, its inclusion in surveillance programs is indispensable. Governmental surveillance of livestock in the European Union only depicts nationally aggregated AMR data. However, obtaining AMR data at subnational levels, although possibly laborious, is essential to gain insights into local situations. These may differ depending on the region surveyed, but their knowledge is essential for targeted risk assessment and interventions. Our study aimed at collecting such data while simultaneously testing a time-saving sampling approach. Hence, we sampled animal transporters carrying fattening pigs to an abattoir with boot swabs and determined AMR prevalence for Escherichia coli strains isolated thereof. The significant subnational differences in AMR prevalence detected indicate that regionalized surveillance data improve and hone the AMR knowledge base. Furthermore, our sampling approach was applicable with reasonable effort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
730
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied and Environmental Microbiology (AEM) publishes papers that make significant contributions to (a) applied microbiology, including biotechnology, protein engineering, bioremediation, and food microbiology, (b) microbial ecology, including environmental, organismic, and genomic microbiology, and (c) interdisciplinary microbiology, including invertebrate microbiology, plant microbiology, aquatic microbiology, and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信