神经肌肉阻滞及其在重症监护病房的监测:一项多中心观察性前瞻性研究。

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Bertrand Hermann, Guillaume Decormeille, Tiphanie Gobé, Nathanaël Mangeard, Adel Maamar, Saria Sayadi, Bénédicte Pernod, Nadine Robquin, Jean-Pierre Ponthus, Sophie Le Potier, Pierre Bouju, Angélique Balabanian, Antoine Frouin, Sébastien Moschietto, Gwenaelle Jacq, Emeline Villemont, Clémence Houbé, Anaïs Queyreau, Célina Morand, Florence Boissier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Sabine Valera, Sami Hraiech, Laure Clouet, Gaël Piton, Cindérella Noël, Anne Joosten, Cécilia Tabra Osorio, Adrien Constan, Jérôme Cecchini, Gwennaelle Mercier, Arnaud Bruyneel, Chloé Villamaux, François Pousset, Nicholas Heming, Laurent Poiroux, Jean-François Llitjos, Saber Davide Barbar
{"title":"神经肌肉阻滞及其在重症监护病房的监测:一项多中心观察性前瞻性研究。","authors":"Bertrand Hermann, Guillaume Decormeille, Tiphanie Gobé, Nathanaël Mangeard, Adel Maamar, Saria Sayadi, Bénédicte Pernod, Nadine Robquin, Jean-Pierre Ponthus, Sophie Le Potier, Pierre Bouju, Angélique Balabanian, Antoine Frouin, Sébastien Moschietto, Gwenaelle Jacq, Emeline Villemont, Clémence Houbé, Anaïs Queyreau, Célina Morand, Florence Boissier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Sabine Valera, Sami Hraiech, Laure Clouet, Gaël Piton, Cindérella Noël, Anne Joosten, Cécilia Tabra Osorio, Adrien Constan, Jérôme Cecchini, Gwennaelle Mercier, Arnaud Bruyneel, Chloé Villamaux, François Pousset, Nicholas Heming, Laurent Poiroux, Jean-François Llitjos, Saber Davide Barbar","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01591-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular blocking agents may improve outcomes in specific conditions, including the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, neuromuscular blocking agents are associated with side effects and uncertainty persists regarding their optimal dosing and efficacy. Our objective was to describe the use of neuromuscular blocking agents in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study, including adult patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation and received a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. Patients were recruited across 19 intensive care units in France and Belgium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 16, 2019, to February 19, 2020, a total of 2248 patients were hospitalized and mechanically ventilated in 19 participating ICUs. Of these, 270 (12%) patients received at least one dose of neuromuscular blocking agents, and 232 (10.3%) received a continuous infusion. The main indications for neuromuscular blocking agents use were acute respiratory distress syndrome (61%), prevention of shivering during therapeutic hypothermia (16%) and patient-ventilator asynchrony (12%). Infusion was initiated in median at 0 [0-2] days after ICU admission, with a median duration of 38 [22-71] hours. Cisatracurium was the preferred agent (74%). Neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring by train-of-four was employed in 48% of patients. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness was diagnosed in 25% of patients, pressure ulcers in 14% and ventilator-associated pneumonia in 26%. The median lengths of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were 9 [4-16] and 13 [6-22] days, and ICU mortality was 41%. In multivariable analyses, a duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of weaning success (SHR 0.83 [0.76, 0.91], p < 0.001) and higher incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, while neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring was associated with both increased intensive care unit-acquired weakness (OR 2.90 [1.2, 7.01], p = 0.018) and reduced ICU mortality (HR 0.55 [95%CI 0.32, 0.95], p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the prevalence of continuous neuromuscular blocking agents infusion among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit was 10.3%. While acute respiratory distress syndrome was the main indication, over one-third of patients received neuromuscular blocking agents for other reasons. A duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with longer mechanical ventilation and increased complications. The role of neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring remains unclear. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04028362 Registered on 18 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04028362 . The study was conducted by the French Intensive Care Society/Société de Réanimation de Langue Française Trial Group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"167"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular blockade and their monitoring in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Bertrand Hermann, Guillaume Decormeille, Tiphanie Gobé, Nathanaël Mangeard, Adel Maamar, Saria Sayadi, Bénédicte Pernod, Nadine Robquin, Jean-Pierre Ponthus, Sophie Le Potier, Pierre Bouju, Angélique Balabanian, Antoine Frouin, Sébastien Moschietto, Gwenaelle Jacq, Emeline Villemont, Clémence Houbé, Anaïs Queyreau, Célina Morand, Florence Boissier, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Sabine Valera, Sami Hraiech, Laure Clouet, Gaël Piton, Cindérella Noël, Anne Joosten, Cécilia Tabra Osorio, Adrien Constan, Jérôme Cecchini, Gwennaelle Mercier, Arnaud Bruyneel, Chloé Villamaux, François Pousset, Nicholas Heming, Laurent Poiroux, Jean-François Llitjos, Saber Davide Barbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13613-025-01591-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular blocking agents may improve outcomes in specific conditions, including the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, neuromuscular blocking agents are associated with side effects and uncertainty persists regarding their optimal dosing and efficacy. Our objective was to describe the use of neuromuscular blocking agents in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study, including adult patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation and received a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. Patients were recruited across 19 intensive care units in France and Belgium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 16, 2019, to February 19, 2020, a total of 2248 patients were hospitalized and mechanically ventilated in 19 participating ICUs. Of these, 270 (12%) patients received at least one dose of neuromuscular blocking agents, and 232 (10.3%) received a continuous infusion. The main indications for neuromuscular blocking agents use were acute respiratory distress syndrome (61%), prevention of shivering during therapeutic hypothermia (16%) and patient-ventilator asynchrony (12%). Infusion was initiated in median at 0 [0-2] days after ICU admission, with a median duration of 38 [22-71] hours. Cisatracurium was the preferred agent (74%). Neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring by train-of-four was employed in 48% of patients. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness was diagnosed in 25% of patients, pressure ulcers in 14% and ventilator-associated pneumonia in 26%. The median lengths of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were 9 [4-16] and 13 [6-22] days, and ICU mortality was 41%. In multivariable analyses, a duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of weaning success (SHR 0.83 [0.76, 0.91], p < 0.001) and higher incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, while neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring was associated with both increased intensive care unit-acquired weakness (OR 2.90 [1.2, 7.01], p = 0.018) and reduced ICU mortality (HR 0.55 [95%CI 0.32, 0.95], p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the prevalence of continuous neuromuscular blocking agents infusion among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit was 10.3%. While acute respiratory distress syndrome was the main indication, over one-third of patients received neuromuscular blocking agents for other reasons. A duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with longer mechanical ventilation and increased complications. The role of neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring remains unclear. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04028362 Registered on 18 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04028362 . The study was conducted by the French Intensive Care Society/Société de Réanimation de Langue Française Trial Group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01591-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01591-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经肌肉阻滞剂可以改善特定情况的预后,包括急性呼吸窘迫综合征的早期阶段。然而,神经肌肉阻滞剂与副作用有关,其最佳剂量和疗效仍然存在不确定性。我们的目的是描述在现实世界中神经肌肉阻滞剂的使用。方法:我们进行了一项多中心、前瞻性观察性研究,包括接受有创机械通气和持续输注神经肌肉阻滞剂的成年患者。在法国和比利时的19个重症监护室招募了患者。结果:2019年11月16日至2020年2月19日,19个参与icu共有2248例患者住院并机械通气。其中,270例(12%)患者接受了至少一剂神经肌肉阻滞剂,232例(10.3%)患者接受了持续输注。使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的主要适应症是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(61%),治疗性低温期间预防寒战(16%)和患者-呼吸机不同步(12%)。中位数在ICU入院后0[0-2]天开始输液,中位数持续时间为38[22-71]小时。顺阿曲库铵是首选药物(74%)。48%的患者采用了四组神经肌肉阻滞剂监测。25%的患者被诊断为重症监护病房获得性虚弱,14%的患者被诊断为压疮,26%的患者被诊断为呼吸机相关肺炎。机械通气和ICU住院时间的中位数分别为9[4-16]和13[6-22]天,ICU死亡率为41%。在多变量分析中,神经肌肉阻滞剂输注时间超过48小时与较低的累计脱机成功率相关(SHR为0.83 [0.76,0.91],p)。结论:在我们的研究中,重症监护病房机械通气患者持续输注神经肌肉阻滞剂的患病率为10.3%。虽然急性呼吸窘迫综合征是主要适应症,但超过三分之一的患者因其他原因接受神经肌肉阻滞剂治疗。神经肌肉阻滞剂输注时间超过48小时,机械通气时间延长,并发症增加。神经肌肉阻滞剂监测的作用尚不清楚。临床试验注册:NCT04028362注册于2019年7月18日,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04028362。这项研究是由法国重症监护学会/法兰西语言学会试验组进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuromuscular blockade and their monitoring in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational prospective study.

Background: Neuromuscular blocking agents may improve outcomes in specific conditions, including the early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, neuromuscular blocking agents are associated with side effects and uncertainty persists regarding their optimal dosing and efficacy. Our objective was to describe the use of neuromuscular blocking agents in a real-world setting.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational study, including adult patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation and received a continuous infusion of neuromuscular blocking agents. Patients were recruited across 19 intensive care units in France and Belgium.

Results: From November 16, 2019, to February 19, 2020, a total of 2248 patients were hospitalized and mechanically ventilated in 19 participating ICUs. Of these, 270 (12%) patients received at least one dose of neuromuscular blocking agents, and 232 (10.3%) received a continuous infusion. The main indications for neuromuscular blocking agents use were acute respiratory distress syndrome (61%), prevention of shivering during therapeutic hypothermia (16%) and patient-ventilator asynchrony (12%). Infusion was initiated in median at 0 [0-2] days after ICU admission, with a median duration of 38 [22-71] hours. Cisatracurium was the preferred agent (74%). Neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring by train-of-four was employed in 48% of patients. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness was diagnosed in 25% of patients, pressure ulcers in 14% and ventilator-associated pneumonia in 26%. The median lengths of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were 9 [4-16] and 13 [6-22] days, and ICU mortality was 41%. In multivariable analyses, a duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of weaning success (SHR 0.83 [0.76, 0.91], p < 0.001) and higher incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, while neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring was associated with both increased intensive care unit-acquired weakness (OR 2.90 [1.2, 7.01], p = 0.018) and reduced ICU mortality (HR 0.55 [95%CI 0.32, 0.95], p = 0.032).

Conclusion: In our study, the prevalence of continuous neuromuscular blocking agents infusion among mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit was 10.3%. While acute respiratory distress syndrome was the main indication, over one-third of patients received neuromuscular blocking agents for other reasons. A duration of neuromuscular blocking agents infusion exceeding 48 hours was associated with longer mechanical ventilation and increased complications. The role of neuromuscular blocking agents monitoring remains unclear. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04028362 Registered on 18 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04028362 . The study was conducted by the French Intensive Care Society/Société de Réanimation de Langue Française Trial Group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信