阿达木单抗生物仿制药过渡的药物生存期和耐受性队列研究:药物特性确实重要。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Amy C D Peeters, Maike H M Wientjes, Wieland D Müskens, David F Ten Cate, Laura C Coates, Bart J F van den Bemt, Noortje van Herwaarden, Alfons A den Broeder
{"title":"阿达木单抗生物仿制药过渡的药物生存期和耐受性队列研究:药物特性确实重要。","authors":"Amy C D Peeters, Maike H M Wientjes, Wieland D Müskens, David F Ten Cate, Laura C Coates, Bart J F van den Bemt, Noortje van Herwaarden, Alfons A den Broeder","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are no clinically meaningful differences between bio-originators (BO) and their biosimilars (BS) in safety and efficacy. However, differences in pharmaceutical properties, such as volume and excipient, can occur. This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients transitioning from the modernized adalimumab BO (0.4 mL/no citrate) to BS1 (0.8 mL/citrate) and from BS1 to BS2 (0.4 mL/no citrate) and outcomes for new starters. In this retrospective exploratory cohort study of RA, PsA, and axial SpA patients receiving adalimumab, the (adjusted) 12-month drug survival rates were compared between the transition from the modernized BO to BS1 (Cohort 1, 2021) and from BS1 to BS2 (Cohort 2, 2023) in existing users, and for adalimumab-naïve new starters of the originator and BS1 and BS2 (Cohorts 3 to 5). Subanalyses included drug survival separately for inefficacy and intolerability. In existing users, 983 patients transitioned to BS1, 1082 patients to BS2, with 659 patients in both cohorts. Drug survival rates at 12 months were 73% (95% CI: 70-76) and 90% (95% CI: 88-92), respectively (P < 0.001), adjusted hazard rate ratio (HRR) 0.32 (95% CI: 0.26-0.40) in favor of BS2. The HRR for discontinuation due to inefficacy and tolerability were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37-0.67) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.28), respectively, both favoring BS2. In adalimumab-naïve new starters also, better survival for the originator and BS2 were seen compared with BS1. In conclusion, adalimumab BS1 showed a significantly lower drug survival than BS2, primarily due to lower tolerability. These findings suggest that pharmaceutical differences can have an important impact on drug survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cohort Study on Drug Survival and Tolerability of Adalimumab Biosimilar Transitioning: Pharmaceutical Properties Do Matter.\",\"authors\":\"Amy C D Peeters, Maike H M Wientjes, Wieland D Müskens, David F Ten Cate, Laura C Coates, Bart J F van den Bemt, Noortje van Herwaarden, Alfons A den Broeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.70098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are no clinically meaningful differences between bio-originators (BO) and their biosimilars (BS) in safety and efficacy. However, differences in pharmaceutical properties, such as volume and excipient, can occur. This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients transitioning from the modernized adalimumab BO (0.4 mL/no citrate) to BS1 (0.8 mL/citrate) and from BS1 to BS2 (0.4 mL/no citrate) and outcomes for new starters. In this retrospective exploratory cohort study of RA, PsA, and axial SpA patients receiving adalimumab, the (adjusted) 12-month drug survival rates were compared between the transition from the modernized BO to BS1 (Cohort 1, 2021) and from BS1 to BS2 (Cohort 2, 2023) in existing users, and for adalimumab-naïve new starters of the originator and BS1 and BS2 (Cohorts 3 to 5). Subanalyses included drug survival separately for inefficacy and intolerability. In existing users, 983 patients transitioned to BS1, 1082 patients to BS2, with 659 patients in both cohorts. Drug survival rates at 12 months were 73% (95% CI: 70-76) and 90% (95% CI: 88-92), respectively (P < 0.001), adjusted hazard rate ratio (HRR) 0.32 (95% CI: 0.26-0.40) in favor of BS2. The HRR for discontinuation due to inefficacy and tolerability were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37-0.67) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.28), respectively, both favoring BS2. In adalimumab-naïve new starters also, better survival for the originator and BS2 were seen compared with BS1. In conclusion, adalimumab BS1 showed a significantly lower drug survival than BS2, primarily due to lower tolerability. These findings suggest that pharmaceutical differences can have an important impact on drug survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70098\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物原研药(BO)与生物类似药(BS)在安全性和有效性方面没有临床意义的差异。然而,药物性质的差异,如体积和赋形剂,可能会发生。本研究旨在比较从现代化阿达木单抗BO (0.4 mL/无柠檬酸盐)过渡到BS1 (0.8 mL/柠檬酸盐)和从BS1过渡到BS2 (0.4 mL/无柠檬酸盐)的患者和新起始者的结果。在这项针对接受阿达利单抗治疗的RA、PsA和轴向SpA患者的回顾性探索性队列研究中,比较了现有患者从现代化BO到BS1(队列1,2021)和从BS1到BS2(队列2,2023)的(调整后的)12个月药物生存率,以及adalimumab-naïve起始药物和BS1和BS2的新起始者(队列3至5)。亚分析分别包括药物无效和不耐受的生存期。在现有用户中,983例患者过渡到BS1, 1082例患者过渡到BS2,两个队列中有659例患者。12个月的药物生存率分别为73% (95% CI: 70-76)和90% (95% CI: 88-92) (P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cohort Study on Drug Survival and Tolerability of Adalimumab Biosimilar Transitioning: Pharmaceutical Properties Do Matter.

There are no clinically meaningful differences between bio-originators (BO) and their biosimilars (BS) in safety and efficacy. However, differences in pharmaceutical properties, such as volume and excipient, can occur. This study aimed to compare outcomes between patients transitioning from the modernized adalimumab BO (0.4 mL/no citrate) to BS1 (0.8 mL/citrate) and from BS1 to BS2 (0.4 mL/no citrate) and outcomes for new starters. In this retrospective exploratory cohort study of RA, PsA, and axial SpA patients receiving adalimumab, the (adjusted) 12-month drug survival rates were compared between the transition from the modernized BO to BS1 (Cohort 1, 2021) and from BS1 to BS2 (Cohort 2, 2023) in existing users, and for adalimumab-naïve new starters of the originator and BS1 and BS2 (Cohorts 3 to 5). Subanalyses included drug survival separately for inefficacy and intolerability. In existing users, 983 patients transitioned to BS1, 1082 patients to BS2, with 659 patients in both cohorts. Drug survival rates at 12 months were 73% (95% CI: 70-76) and 90% (95% CI: 88-92), respectively (P < 0.001), adjusted hazard rate ratio (HRR) 0.32 (95% CI: 0.26-0.40) in favor of BS2. The HRR for discontinuation due to inefficacy and tolerability were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.37-0.67) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.28), respectively, both favoring BS2. In adalimumab-naïve new starters also, better survival for the originator and BS2 were seen compared with BS1. In conclusion, adalimumab BS1 showed a significantly lower drug survival than BS2, primarily due to lower tolerability. These findings suggest that pharmaceutical differences can have an important impact on drug survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信