有症状的妇女在腹腔镜手术前进行子宫内膜异位症的无创血液检测:有好处吗?

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
FZ Bischoff, WH Wong, A Yu
{"title":"有症状的妇女在腹腔镜手术前进行子宫内膜异位症的无创血液检测:有好处吗?","authors":"FZ Bischoff,&nbsp;WH Wong,&nbsp;A Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.09.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>To demonstrate efficacy in performing noninvasive blood-based testing to confirm the presence or absence of endometriosis among women considering laparoscopy with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or abnormal menstrual bleeding.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This is a case-control, observational, prospective study designed to demonstrate the concordance between a noninvasive blood-based diagnostic approach for detecting endometriosis as compared to gold standard laparoscopy with histology.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Under IRB consent, 10ml peripheral blood was drawn from symptomatic women prior to scheduled laparoscopy. Blood samples were processed to separate serum for RNA isolation, cDNA preparation followed by analysis by qPCR and a bioinformatic AI model that was developed using machine learning to predict presence or absence of endometriosis. Concordance between histology and the miRNA blood test was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>215 women with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or abnormal menstrual bleeding and undergo laparoscopy were enrolled. Subjects had no previous history of endometriosis.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Primary Results</h3><div>An overall 91% concordance between the invasive gold standard procedure and the noninvasive blood-based miRNA test was observed with 95% specificity. Results were is independent of disease stage, type of endometriosis and the presence of other gynecologic conditions, such as uterine fibroids and leiomyomas. Among cases found to be discordant between visual laparoscopy and histology, miRNA results were more consistent with histology outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using circulating serum miRNAs as a diagnostic to confirm the presence or absence of endometriosis offers several advantages over conventional diagnostic. Currently, the gold standard for endometriosis diagnosis relies on laparoscopy for direct visualization, an invasive surgical procedure that poses risk to the subject. A noninvasive blood-based miRNA test can inform and aid the surgical team in preparing for potentially difficult cases where the need to search for lesions may justified. This may be particularly valuable for early detection and for patients who may not have immediate access to specialized surgical evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":"32 11","pages":"Page S25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Blood-Based Detection of Endometriosis Prior to Surgical Laparoscopy Among Symptomatic Women: Is There a Benefit?\",\"authors\":\"FZ Bischoff,&nbsp;WH Wong,&nbsp;A Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.09.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><div>To demonstrate efficacy in performing noninvasive blood-based testing to confirm the presence or absence of endometriosis among women considering laparoscopy with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or abnormal menstrual bleeding.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This is a case-control, observational, prospective study designed to demonstrate the concordance between a noninvasive blood-based diagnostic approach for detecting endometriosis as compared to gold standard laparoscopy with histology.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Under IRB consent, 10ml peripheral blood was drawn from symptomatic women prior to scheduled laparoscopy. Blood samples were processed to separate serum for RNA isolation, cDNA preparation followed by analysis by qPCR and a bioinformatic AI model that was developed using machine learning to predict presence or absence of endometriosis. Concordance between histology and the miRNA blood test was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Patients or Participants</h3><div>215 women with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or abnormal menstrual bleeding and undergo laparoscopy were enrolled. Subjects had no previous history of endometriosis.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Primary Results</h3><div>An overall 91% concordance between the invasive gold standard procedure and the noninvasive blood-based miRNA test was observed with 95% specificity. Results were is independent of disease stage, type of endometriosis and the presence of other gynecologic conditions, such as uterine fibroids and leiomyomas. Among cases found to be discordant between visual laparoscopy and histology, miRNA results were more consistent with histology outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using circulating serum miRNAs as a diagnostic to confirm the presence or absence of endometriosis offers several advantages over conventional diagnostic. Currently, the gold standard for endometriosis diagnosis relies on laparoscopy for direct visualization, an invasive surgical procedure that poses risk to the subject. A noninvasive blood-based miRNA test can inform and aid the surgical team in preparing for potentially difficult cases where the need to search for lesions may justified. This may be particularly valuable for early detection and for patients who may not have immediate access to specialized surgical evaluation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\"32 11\",\"pages\":\"Page S25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465025003681\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465025003681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:在有盆腔疼痛和/或月经异常出血症状的妇女考虑腹腔镜检查时,证实无创血液检查是否存在子宫内膜异位症的有效性。这是一项病例对照、观察性、前瞻性研究,旨在证明无创血液诊断方法检测子宫内膜异位症与金标准腹腔镜组织学检查之间的一致性。在IRB同意下,在预定的腹腔镜检查之前从有症状的女性中抽取10ml外周血。对血液样本进行处理,分离血清进行RNA分离、cDNA制备、qPCR分析和利用机器学习开发的生物信息学人工智能模型来预测子宫内膜异位症的存在或不存在。确定组织学与miRNA血检的一致性。患者或参与者:215名有盆腔疼痛和/或月经异常出血症状并接受腹腔镜检查的女性被纳入研究。受试者既往无子宫内膜异位症病史。InterventionsNot适用。测量结果和主要结果有创性金标准程序和无创血液miRNA检测之间的一致性为91%,特异性为95%。结果与疾病分期、子宫内膜异位症类型和其他妇科疾病(如子宫肌瘤和平滑肌瘤)的存在无关。在发现腹腔镜视觉检查与组织学结果不一致的病例中,miRNA结果与组织学结果更为一致。结论使用循环血清mirna作为诊断方法来确认子宫内膜异位症的存在与不存在比传统诊断方法有许多优点。目前,子宫内膜异位症诊断的金标准依赖于腹腔镜直接可视化,这是一种对患者有风险的侵入性手术。无创血液miRNA检测可以告知并帮助外科团队为可能需要寻找病变的潜在困难病例做准备。这对于早期发现和无法立即获得专门手术评估的患者尤其有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noninvasive Blood-Based Detection of Endometriosis Prior to Surgical Laparoscopy Among Symptomatic Women: Is There a Benefit?

Study Objective

To demonstrate efficacy in performing noninvasive blood-based testing to confirm the presence or absence of endometriosis among women considering laparoscopy with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or abnormal menstrual bleeding.

Design

This is a case-control, observational, prospective study designed to demonstrate the concordance between a noninvasive blood-based diagnostic approach for detecting endometriosis as compared to gold standard laparoscopy with histology.

Setting

Under IRB consent, 10ml peripheral blood was drawn from symptomatic women prior to scheduled laparoscopy. Blood samples were processed to separate serum for RNA isolation, cDNA preparation followed by analysis by qPCR and a bioinformatic AI model that was developed using machine learning to predict presence or absence of endometriosis. Concordance between histology and the miRNA blood test was determined.

Patients or Participants

215 women with symptoms of pelvic pain and/or abnormal menstrual bleeding and undergo laparoscopy were enrolled. Subjects had no previous history of endometriosis.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Measurements and Primary Results

An overall 91% concordance between the invasive gold standard procedure and the noninvasive blood-based miRNA test was observed with 95% specificity. Results were is independent of disease stage, type of endometriosis and the presence of other gynecologic conditions, such as uterine fibroids and leiomyomas. Among cases found to be discordant between visual laparoscopy and histology, miRNA results were more consistent with histology outcome.

Conclusion

Using circulating serum miRNAs as a diagnostic to confirm the presence or absence of endometriosis offers several advantages over conventional diagnostic. Currently, the gold standard for endometriosis diagnosis relies on laparoscopy for direct visualization, an invasive surgical procedure that poses risk to the subject. A noninvasive blood-based miRNA test can inform and aid the surgical team in preparing for potentially difficult cases where the need to search for lesions may justified. This may be particularly valuable for early detection and for patients who may not have immediate access to specialized surgical evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信