基于区块链的医疗数据共享中的隐私保护:系统回顾。

IF 2.6 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s12083-025-02148-9
Kun Li, Ankur Lohachab, Michel Dumontier, Visara Urovi
{"title":"基于区块链的医疗数据共享中的隐私保护:系统回顾。","authors":"Kun Li, Ankur Lohachab, Michel Dumontier, Visara Urovi","doi":"10.1007/s12083-025-02148-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blockchain technology promises enhanced data ownership, control, and interoperability in healthcare, yet security and privacy concerns continue to hinder its adoption. Existing surveys examine blockchain-based privacy challenges, but they lack a systematic analysis and maturity evaluation of privacy-preserving techniques tailored to healthcare data sharing. This paper presents a systematic review of blockchain-based privacy-preserving solutions, analyzing blockchain details, applied privacy methods, regulatory compliance, and maturity levels using Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Our findings reveal that authentication and authorization is the most explored stage, dominated by smart contracts and ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption. Proxy re-encryption is frequently used for data transfer, while privacy-preserving search and verification remain underexplored. On/off-chain mechanisms are commonly applied to balance privacy and storage efficiency. TRL assessment shows that most solutions remain at the proof-of-concept stage (TRL3), with only limited progress to prototype validation (TRL4-TRL5), highlighting the gap between experimental designs and real-world deployment. To guide developers and researchers, we identify two primary patterns of blockchain integration and propose a framework for system design. We also compare methods across data-sharing stages, outlining their strengths and limitations to support informed selection. In conclusion, while research interest is growing, the field remains at an early stage of maturity. Addressing this gap requires stronger implementation capacity, access to clinical data, and robust regulatory alignment. We emphasize the importance of clinical validation and real-world testing to advance privacy-preserving blockchain solutions toward practical adoption in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":49313,"journal":{"name":"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications","volume":"18 6","pages":"302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12534302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Kun Li, Ankur Lohachab, Michel Dumontier, Visara Urovi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12083-025-02148-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Blockchain technology promises enhanced data ownership, control, and interoperability in healthcare, yet security and privacy concerns continue to hinder its adoption. Existing surveys examine blockchain-based privacy challenges, but they lack a systematic analysis and maturity evaluation of privacy-preserving techniques tailored to healthcare data sharing. This paper presents a systematic review of blockchain-based privacy-preserving solutions, analyzing blockchain details, applied privacy methods, regulatory compliance, and maturity levels using Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Our findings reveal that authentication and authorization is the most explored stage, dominated by smart contracts and ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption. Proxy re-encryption is frequently used for data transfer, while privacy-preserving search and verification remain underexplored. On/off-chain mechanisms are commonly applied to balance privacy and storage efficiency. TRL assessment shows that most solutions remain at the proof-of-concept stage (TRL3), with only limited progress to prototype validation (TRL4-TRL5), highlighting the gap between experimental designs and real-world deployment. To guide developers and researchers, we identify two primary patterns of blockchain integration and propose a framework for system design. We also compare methods across data-sharing stages, outlining their strengths and limitations to support informed selection. In conclusion, while research interest is growing, the field remains at an early stage of maturity. Addressing this gap requires stronger implementation capacity, access to clinical data, and robust regulatory alignment. We emphasize the importance of clinical validation and real-world testing to advance privacy-preserving blockchain solutions toward practical adoption in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12534302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-025-02148-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-025-02148-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

区块链技术有望在医疗保健领域增强数据所有权、控制和互操作性,但安全和隐私问题继续阻碍其采用。现有的调查研究了基于区块链的隐私挑战,但它们缺乏针对医疗数据共享量身定制的隐私保护技术的系统分析和成熟度评估。本文系统地回顾了基于区块链的隐私保护解决方案,分析了区块链细节、应用的隐私方法、法规遵从性和使用技术就绪级别(trl)的成熟度级别。我们的研究结果表明,身份验证和授权是探索最多的阶段,主要是智能合约和基于属性的密文策略加密。代理重新加密经常用于数据传输,而保护隐私的搜索和验证仍未得到充分探索。链上/链下机制通常用于平衡隐私和存储效率。TRL评估显示,大多数解决方案仍处于概念验证阶段(TRL3),只有有限的原型验证进展(TRL4-TRL5),突出了实验设计与实际部署之间的差距。为了指导开发人员和研究人员,我们确定了区块链集成的两种主要模式,并提出了一个系统设计框架。我们还比较了数据共享阶段的方法,概述了它们的优势和局限性,以支持知情选择。总之,虽然研究兴趣在增长,但该领域仍处于成熟的早期阶段。解决这一差距需要更强的实施能力、获得临床数据和强有力的监管一致性。我们强调临床验证和实际测试的重要性,以推进隐私保护区块链解决方案在医疗保健领域的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review.

Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review.

Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review.

Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review.

Blockchain technology promises enhanced data ownership, control, and interoperability in healthcare, yet security and privacy concerns continue to hinder its adoption. Existing surveys examine blockchain-based privacy challenges, but they lack a systematic analysis and maturity evaluation of privacy-preserving techniques tailored to healthcare data sharing. This paper presents a systematic review of blockchain-based privacy-preserving solutions, analyzing blockchain details, applied privacy methods, regulatory compliance, and maturity levels using Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Our findings reveal that authentication and authorization is the most explored stage, dominated by smart contracts and ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption. Proxy re-encryption is frequently used for data transfer, while privacy-preserving search and verification remain underexplored. On/off-chain mechanisms are commonly applied to balance privacy and storage efficiency. TRL assessment shows that most solutions remain at the proof-of-concept stage (TRL3), with only limited progress to prototype validation (TRL4-TRL5), highlighting the gap between experimental designs and real-world deployment. To guide developers and researchers, we identify two primary patterns of blockchain integration and propose a framework for system design. We also compare methods across data-sharing stages, outlining their strengths and limitations to support informed selection. In conclusion, while research interest is growing, the field remains at an early stage of maturity. Addressing this gap requires stronger implementation capacity, access to clinical data, and robust regulatory alignment. We emphasize the importance of clinical validation and real-world testing to advance privacy-preserving blockchain solutions toward practical adoption in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications
Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-TELECOMMUNICATIONS
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
145
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The aim of the Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications journal is to disseminate state-of-the-art research and development results in this rapidly growing research area, to facilitate the deployment of P2P networking and applications, and to bring together the academic and industry communities, with the goal of fostering interaction to promote further research interests and activities, thus enabling new P2P applications and services. The journal not only addresses research topics related to networking and communications theory, but also considers the standardization, economic, and engineering aspects of P2P technologies, and their impacts on software engineering, computer engineering, networked communication, and security. The journal serves as a forum for tackling the technical problems arising from both file sharing and media streaming applications. It also includes state-of-the-art technologies in the P2P security domain. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications publishes regular papers, tutorials and review papers, case studies, and correspondence from the research, development, and standardization communities. Papers addressing system, application, and service issues are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信