Abhinav Bassi, Niveditha Devasenapathy, Shani S Thankachen, Arpita Ghosh, Aman Rastogi, Ritika Khan, Bijini Bahuleyan, Balaji Gummidi, Aneesh Basheer, Thekkumkara Prabhakaran Sreelal, Ashfak Bangi, Yasmeen Shaikh, Dibakar Sahu, Vinay Rathore, Ashish Bhalla, Samita Samita, Merlin Blessan, T S Dipu, Manish Jain, Abhishek Mukundbhai Prajapati, Narendra Kuber Bodhey, Vivekanand Jha
{"title":"秋水仙碱治疗长冠肺炎的随机临床试验","authors":"Abhinav Bassi, Niveditha Devasenapathy, Shani S Thankachen, Arpita Ghosh, Aman Rastogi, Ritika Khan, Bijini Bahuleyan, Balaji Gummidi, Aneesh Basheer, Thekkumkara Prabhakaran Sreelal, Ashfak Bangi, Yasmeen Shaikh, Dibakar Sahu, Vinay Rathore, Ashish Bhalla, Samita Samita, Merlin Blessan, T S Dipu, Manish Jain, Abhishek Mukundbhai Prajapati, Narendra Kuber Bodhey, Vivekanand Jha","doi":"10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Long COVID is characterized by persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, with inflammation playing a key role in pathogenesis. Colchicine, an established anti-inflammatory agent, may reduce these symptoms by targeting inflammatory pathways.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the superiority of colchicine over placebo in improving functional outcome at 52 weeks from baseline.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This double-blind, 1:1 randomized clinical trial recruited participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistent symptoms from 8 hospitals in 6 states in India between January 2022 and July 2023. Individuals were eligible if they had functional limitation (Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale grade 2 or more) and/or elevated inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >0.20 mg/dL and/or neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5). Outcomes were assessed at 12, 26, and 52 weeks after randomization. Data were analyzed from January to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to receive colchicine, 0.5 mg, once or twice daily, based on body weight, or placebo for 26 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in distance walked during a 6-minute walk test from baseline to 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in inflammatory markers and patient-reported outcome measures, such as quality of life, anxiety, depression, fatigue, dyspnea, measured using validated instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 346 participants included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 209 (60.4%) were female, 137 (39.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 46 (12) years. At 52 weeks, there was no difference in mean (SD) change in 6-minute walk test distance between the colchicine and placebo groups (colchicine, 35.5 [19.76] m; placebo, 29.96 [19.83] m; mean difference, 5.59 m; 95% CI, -9.00 to 20.18; P = .45). Similar null findings were seen across all predefined outcomes, except for a small, nonclinically relevant difference in the mean (SD) ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (colchicine, -0.02 [0.03]; placebo, -0.06 [0.03]; mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, among adults with long COVID, colchicine did not improve functional capacity, respiratory function, or inflammatory markers. These findings underscore the need to explore alternative therapeutic approaches for long COVID.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2021/11/038234.</p>","PeriodicalId":14714,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Colchicine for the Treatment of Long COVID: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Abhinav Bassi, Niveditha Devasenapathy, Shani S Thankachen, Arpita Ghosh, Aman Rastogi, Ritika Khan, Bijini Bahuleyan, Balaji Gummidi, Aneesh Basheer, Thekkumkara Prabhakaran Sreelal, Ashfak Bangi, Yasmeen Shaikh, Dibakar Sahu, Vinay Rathore, Ashish Bhalla, Samita Samita, Merlin Blessan, T S Dipu, Manish Jain, Abhishek Mukundbhai Prajapati, Narendra Kuber Bodhey, Vivekanand Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Long COVID is characterized by persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, with inflammation playing a key role in pathogenesis. Colchicine, an established anti-inflammatory agent, may reduce these symptoms by targeting inflammatory pathways.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the superiority of colchicine over placebo in improving functional outcome at 52 weeks from baseline.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This double-blind, 1:1 randomized clinical trial recruited participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistent symptoms from 8 hospitals in 6 states in India between January 2022 and July 2023. Individuals were eligible if they had functional limitation (Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale grade 2 or more) and/or elevated inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >0.20 mg/dL and/or neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5). Outcomes were assessed at 12, 26, and 52 weeks after randomization. Data were analyzed from January to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to receive colchicine, 0.5 mg, once or twice daily, based on body weight, or placebo for 26 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in distance walked during a 6-minute walk test from baseline to 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in inflammatory markers and patient-reported outcome measures, such as quality of life, anxiety, depression, fatigue, dyspnea, measured using validated instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 346 participants included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 209 (60.4%) were female, 137 (39.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 46 (12) years. At 52 weeks, there was no difference in mean (SD) change in 6-minute walk test distance between the colchicine and placebo groups (colchicine, 35.5 [19.76] m; placebo, 29.96 [19.83] m; mean difference, 5.59 m; 95% CI, -9.00 to 20.18; P = .45). Similar null findings were seen across all predefined outcomes, except for a small, nonclinically relevant difference in the mean (SD) ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (colchicine, -0.02 [0.03]; placebo, -0.06 [0.03]; mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, among adults with long COVID, colchicine did not improve functional capacity, respiratory function, or inflammatory markers. These findings underscore the need to explore alternative therapeutic approaches for long COVID.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2021/11/038234.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5408\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5408","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
重要性:长冠肺炎是SARS-CoV-2感染后症状持续的特征,炎症在发病机制中起关键作用。秋水仙碱是一种公认的抗炎剂,可以通过靶向炎症途径来减轻这些症状。目的:评价秋水仙碱在改善基线后52周的功能结局方面优于安慰剂。设计、环境和参与者:这项双盲、1:1随机临床试验招募了2022年1月至2023年7月期间印度6个州8家医院确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染和持续症状的参与者。如果个体有功能限制(covid -19后功能状态量表2级或以上)和/或炎症标志物升高(高敏c反应蛋白>0.20 mg/dL和/或中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值>5),则符合条件。在随机分组后12周、26周和52周评估结果。数据分析时间为2025年1月至2月。干预措施:参与者被随机分配接受秋水仙碱,0.5毫克,每天一次或两次,根据体重,或安慰剂26周。主要结局和测量:主要结局是6分钟步行测试期间步行距离从基线到52周的变化。次要结果包括炎症标志物的变化和患者报告的结果测量,如生活质量、焦虑、抑郁、疲劳、呼吸困难,使用经过验证的仪器测量。结果:在修改意向治疗分析的346名参与者中,209名(60.4%)为女性,137名(39.6%)为男性,平均(SD)年龄为46(12)岁。在52周时,秋水仙碱组和安慰剂组6分钟步行测试距离的平均(SD)变化无差异(秋水仙碱组,35.5 [19.76]m;安慰剂组,29.96 [19.83]m;平均差异5.59 m; 95% CI, -9.00 ~ 20.18; P = 0.45)。除了1秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量的平均(SD)比(秋水仙碱,-0.02[0.03];安慰剂,-0.06[0.03];平均差异0.04;95% CI, 0.02至0.07;P = 0.001),所有预定结局均出现类似的无效结果。结论和相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,秋水仙碱对长COVID的成年人没有改善功能能力、呼吸功能或炎症标志物。这些发现强调了探索长期COVID替代治疗方法的必要性。试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心:CTRI/2021/11/038234。
Effectiveness of Colchicine for the Treatment of Long COVID: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Long COVID is characterized by persistent symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, with inflammation playing a key role in pathogenesis. Colchicine, an established anti-inflammatory agent, may reduce these symptoms by targeting inflammatory pathways.
Objective: To evaluate the superiority of colchicine over placebo in improving functional outcome at 52 weeks from baseline.
Design, setting, and participants: This double-blind, 1:1 randomized clinical trial recruited participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistent symptoms from 8 hospitals in 6 states in India between January 2022 and July 2023. Individuals were eligible if they had functional limitation (Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale grade 2 or more) and/or elevated inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >0.20 mg/dL and/or neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >5). Outcomes were assessed at 12, 26, and 52 weeks after randomization. Data were analyzed from January to February 2025.
Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive colchicine, 0.5 mg, once or twice daily, based on body weight, or placebo for 26 weeks.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the change in distance walked during a 6-minute walk test from baseline to 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in inflammatory markers and patient-reported outcome measures, such as quality of life, anxiety, depression, fatigue, dyspnea, measured using validated instruments.
Results: Of 346 participants included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 209 (60.4%) were female, 137 (39.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 46 (12) years. At 52 weeks, there was no difference in mean (SD) change in 6-minute walk test distance between the colchicine and placebo groups (colchicine, 35.5 [19.76] m; placebo, 29.96 [19.83] m; mean difference, 5.59 m; 95% CI, -9.00 to 20.18; P = .45). Similar null findings were seen across all predefined outcomes, except for a small, nonclinically relevant difference in the mean (SD) ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (colchicine, -0.02 [0.03]; placebo, -0.06 [0.03]; mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; P = .001).
Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, among adults with long COVID, colchicine did not improve functional capacity, respiratory function, or inflammatory markers. These findings underscore the need to explore alternative therapeutic approaches for long COVID.
Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry of India: CTRI/2021/11/038234.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal committed to advancing the field of internal medicine worldwide. With a focus on four core priorities—clinical relevance, clinical practice change, credibility, and effective communication—the journal aims to provide indispensable and trustworthy peer-reviewed evidence.
Catering to academics, clinicians, educators, researchers, and trainees across the entire spectrum of internal medicine, including general internal medicine and subspecialties, JAMA Internal Medicine publishes innovative and clinically relevant research. The journal strives to deliver stimulating articles that educate and inform readers with the latest research findings, driving positive change in healthcare systems and patient care delivery.
As a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed medical publications, JAMA Internal Medicine plays a pivotal role in shaping the discourse and advancing patient care in internal medicine.