Carla Kantyka, Rishini Wanigasekara, Vennila Ponnusamy, Paul T Heath, Paul Clarke
{"title":"当前抗生素和预防性抗真菌药物政策在英国新生儿重症监护病房:一项全国性调查。","authors":"Carla Kantyka, Rishini Wanigasekara, Vennila Ponnusamy, Paul T Heath, Paul Clarke","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To survey the current antibiotic and antifungal drug practices of UK neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and to identify antibiotic preferences and policies for treatment of early- and late-onset sepsis (EoS and LoS), meningitis, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January and May 2024, we contacted all 53 tertiary-level UK NICUs via telephone and/or e-mail. We requested a copy of each unit's guidelines for antibiotic treatment of EoS and LoS, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained guidelines from 53/53 (100%) units. A penicillin and aminoglycoside combination was the consistent first-line recommendation for EoS in 51/53 (96%) units. Only a minority (11/53; 21%) units specified any second-line antibiotic regimen for EoS, though most (44/53; 83%) specifically recommended amoxicillin for suspected listeriosis. For LoS, almost all NICUs (52/53; 98%) provided specific guidance on empirical first-line antibiotic treatment, with empirical narrow-spectrum antibiotics as first-line LoS treatment for term neonates in 42/53 (79%) NICUs and for preterm neonates in 41/53 (77%) NICUs. Fifty-four percent (29/53) of units included specific LoS recommendations for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Sixty-six percent (35/53) of NICUs included cefotaxime in their empirical meningitis regimens. Eighty-five percent (45/53) of units had clear guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While EoS treatment was consistent across units, there remained wide variation in antibiotic regimens used for LoS and meningitis, and for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Guidelines specific to preterm neonates were limited. The practice of routine antifungal prophylaxis has been more prevalent since the last UK survey in 2006-07 but is still neither universal nor consistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 5","pages":"dlaf194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current antibiotic and prophylactic antifungal drug policies in UK neonatal intensive care units: a national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Carla Kantyka, Rishini Wanigasekara, Vennila Ponnusamy, Paul T Heath, Paul Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To survey the current antibiotic and antifungal drug practices of UK neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and to identify antibiotic preferences and policies for treatment of early- and late-onset sepsis (EoS and LoS), meningitis, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January and May 2024, we contacted all 53 tertiary-level UK NICUs via telephone and/or e-mail. We requested a copy of each unit's guidelines for antibiotic treatment of EoS and LoS, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained guidelines from 53/53 (100%) units. A penicillin and aminoglycoside combination was the consistent first-line recommendation for EoS in 51/53 (96%) units. Only a minority (11/53; 21%) units specified any second-line antibiotic regimen for EoS, though most (44/53; 83%) specifically recommended amoxicillin for suspected listeriosis. For LoS, almost all NICUs (52/53; 98%) provided specific guidance on empirical first-line antibiotic treatment, with empirical narrow-spectrum antibiotics as first-line LoS treatment for term neonates in 42/53 (79%) NICUs and for preterm neonates in 41/53 (77%) NICUs. Fifty-four percent (29/53) of units included specific LoS recommendations for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Sixty-six percent (35/53) of NICUs included cefotaxime in their empirical meningitis regimens. Eighty-five percent (45/53) of units had clear guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While EoS treatment was consistent across units, there remained wide variation in antibiotic regimens used for LoS and meningitis, and for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Guidelines specific to preterm neonates were limited. The practice of routine antifungal prophylaxis has been more prevalent since the last UK survey in 2006-07 but is still neither universal nor consistent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"dlaf194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current antibiotic and prophylactic antifungal drug policies in UK neonatal intensive care units: a national survey.
Objectives: To survey the current antibiotic and antifungal drug practices of UK neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and to identify antibiotic preferences and policies for treatment of early- and late-onset sepsis (EoS and LoS), meningitis, and antifungal prophylaxis.
Methods: Between January and May 2024, we contacted all 53 tertiary-level UK NICUs via telephone and/or e-mail. We requested a copy of each unit's guidelines for antibiotic treatment of EoS and LoS, and antifungal prophylaxis.
Results: We obtained guidelines from 53/53 (100%) units. A penicillin and aminoglycoside combination was the consistent first-line recommendation for EoS in 51/53 (96%) units. Only a minority (11/53; 21%) units specified any second-line antibiotic regimen for EoS, though most (44/53; 83%) specifically recommended amoxicillin for suspected listeriosis. For LoS, almost all NICUs (52/53; 98%) provided specific guidance on empirical first-line antibiotic treatment, with empirical narrow-spectrum antibiotics as first-line LoS treatment for term neonates in 42/53 (79%) NICUs and for preterm neonates in 41/53 (77%) NICUs. Fifty-four percent (29/53) of units included specific LoS recommendations for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Sixty-six percent (35/53) of NICUs included cefotaxime in their empirical meningitis regimens. Eighty-five percent (45/53) of units had clear guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis.
Conclusions: While EoS treatment was consistent across units, there remained wide variation in antibiotic regimens used for LoS and meningitis, and for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Guidelines specific to preterm neonates were limited. The practice of routine antifungal prophylaxis has been more prevalent since the last UK survey in 2006-07 but is still neither universal nor consistent.