当前抗生素和预防性抗真菌药物政策在英国新生儿重症监护病房:一项全国性调查。

IF 3.3 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-10-16 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194
Carla Kantyka, Rishini Wanigasekara, Vennila Ponnusamy, Paul T Heath, Paul Clarke
{"title":"当前抗生素和预防性抗真菌药物政策在英国新生儿重症监护病房:一项全国性调查。","authors":"Carla Kantyka, Rishini Wanigasekara, Vennila Ponnusamy, Paul T Heath, Paul Clarke","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To survey the current antibiotic and antifungal drug practices of UK neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and to identify antibiotic preferences and policies for treatment of early- and late-onset sepsis (EoS and LoS), meningitis, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January and May 2024, we contacted all 53 tertiary-level UK NICUs via telephone and/or e-mail. We requested a copy of each unit's guidelines for antibiotic treatment of EoS and LoS, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained guidelines from 53/53 (100%) units. A penicillin and aminoglycoside combination was the consistent first-line recommendation for EoS in 51/53 (96%) units. Only a minority (11/53; 21%) units specified any second-line antibiotic regimen for EoS, though most (44/53; 83%) specifically recommended amoxicillin for suspected listeriosis. For LoS, almost all NICUs (52/53; 98%) provided specific guidance on empirical first-line antibiotic treatment, with empirical narrow-spectrum antibiotics as first-line LoS treatment for term neonates in 42/53 (79%) NICUs and for preterm neonates in 41/53 (77%) NICUs. Fifty-four percent (29/53) of units included specific LoS recommendations for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Sixty-six percent (35/53) of NICUs included cefotaxime in their empirical meningitis regimens. Eighty-five percent (45/53) of units had clear guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While EoS treatment was consistent across units, there remained wide variation in antibiotic regimens used for LoS and meningitis, and for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Guidelines specific to preterm neonates were limited. The practice of routine antifungal prophylaxis has been more prevalent since the last UK survey in 2006-07 but is still neither universal nor consistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 5","pages":"dlaf194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current antibiotic and prophylactic antifungal drug policies in UK neonatal intensive care units: a national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Carla Kantyka, Rishini Wanigasekara, Vennila Ponnusamy, Paul T Heath, Paul Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To survey the current antibiotic and antifungal drug practices of UK neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and to identify antibiotic preferences and policies for treatment of early- and late-onset sepsis (EoS and LoS), meningitis, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January and May 2024, we contacted all 53 tertiary-level UK NICUs via telephone and/or e-mail. We requested a copy of each unit's guidelines for antibiotic treatment of EoS and LoS, and antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained guidelines from 53/53 (100%) units. A penicillin and aminoglycoside combination was the consistent first-line recommendation for EoS in 51/53 (96%) units. Only a minority (11/53; 21%) units specified any second-line antibiotic regimen for EoS, though most (44/53; 83%) specifically recommended amoxicillin for suspected listeriosis. For LoS, almost all NICUs (52/53; 98%) provided specific guidance on empirical first-line antibiotic treatment, with empirical narrow-spectrum antibiotics as first-line LoS treatment for term neonates in 42/53 (79%) NICUs and for preterm neonates in 41/53 (77%) NICUs. Fifty-four percent (29/53) of units included specific LoS recommendations for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Sixty-six percent (35/53) of NICUs included cefotaxime in their empirical meningitis regimens. Eighty-five percent (45/53) of units had clear guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While EoS treatment was consistent across units, there remained wide variation in antibiotic regimens used for LoS and meningitis, and for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Guidelines specific to preterm neonates were limited. The practice of routine antifungal prophylaxis has been more prevalent since the last UK survey in 2006-07 but is still neither universal nor consistent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"dlaf194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查英国新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)目前抗生素和抗真菌药物的使用情况,并确定治疗早发性和晚发性脓毒症(EoS和LoS)、脑膜炎和抗真菌预防的抗生素偏好和政策。方法:在2024年1月至5月期间,我们通过电话和/或电子邮件联系了所有53个英国三级新生儿重症监护病房。我们要求每个单位提供一份EoS和LoS的抗生素治疗指南,以及抗真菌预防指南。结果:我们获得了53/53(100%)个单位的指南。51/53个单位(96%)的EoS患者一线推荐使用青霉素和氨基糖苷类药物。只有少数(11/53;21%)单位指定了任何二线抗生素治疗方案,尽管大多数(44/53;83%)单位专门推荐阿莫西林治疗疑似李斯特菌病。对于LoS,几乎所有nicu(52/53; 98%)都提供了经验性一线抗生素治疗的具体指导,42/53 nicu(79%)的足月新生儿和41/53 nicu(77%)的早产儿使用经验性窄谱抗生素作为一线LoS治疗。54%(29/53)的单位包括对留置中心静脉导管的新生儿的特定LoS建议。66%(35/53)的新生儿重症监护病房将头孢噻肟纳入其经验性脑膜炎方案。85%(45/53)的单位有明确的抗真菌预防指南。结论:虽然各单位的EoS治疗是一致的,但用于LoS和脑膜炎以及留置中心静脉导管的新生儿的抗生素方案仍然存在很大差异。针对早产儿的指导方针是有限的。自2006-07年英国上次调查以来,常规抗真菌预防的做法更为普遍,但仍然既不普遍也不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current antibiotic and prophylactic antifungal drug policies in UK neonatal intensive care units: a national survey.

Objectives: To survey the current antibiotic and antifungal drug practices of UK neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and to identify antibiotic preferences and policies for treatment of early- and late-onset sepsis (EoS and LoS), meningitis, and antifungal prophylaxis.

Methods: Between January and May 2024, we contacted all 53 tertiary-level UK NICUs via telephone and/or e-mail. We requested a copy of each unit's guidelines for antibiotic treatment of EoS and LoS, and antifungal prophylaxis.

Results: We obtained guidelines from 53/53 (100%) units. A penicillin and aminoglycoside combination was the consistent first-line recommendation for EoS in 51/53 (96%) units. Only a minority (11/53; 21%) units specified any second-line antibiotic regimen for EoS, though most (44/53; 83%) specifically recommended amoxicillin for suspected listeriosis. For LoS, almost all NICUs (52/53; 98%) provided specific guidance on empirical first-line antibiotic treatment, with empirical narrow-spectrum antibiotics as first-line LoS treatment for term neonates in 42/53 (79%) NICUs and for preterm neonates in 41/53 (77%) NICUs. Fifty-four percent (29/53) of units included specific LoS recommendations for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Sixty-six percent (35/53) of NICUs included cefotaxime in their empirical meningitis regimens. Eighty-five percent (45/53) of units had clear guidelines for antifungal prophylaxis.

Conclusions: While EoS treatment was consistent across units, there remained wide variation in antibiotic regimens used for LoS and meningitis, and for neonates with indwelling central venous catheters. Guidelines specific to preterm neonates were limited. The practice of routine antifungal prophylaxis has been more prevalent since the last UK survey in 2006-07 but is still neither universal nor consistent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信