Jin Zhao, Xiaolian Wen, Li Ma, Xiaojing Guo, Liping Su
{"title":"G-CSF化疗与G-CSF普立沙替在淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞动员中的疗效比较。","authors":"Jin Zhao, Xiaolian Wen, Li Ma, Xiaojing Guo, Liping Su","doi":"10.62347/XSXL9602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the efficacy, safety, hematological recovery, immune reconstitution, infection rates, and quality of life (QoL) between two stem cell mobilization regimens - granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus chemotherapy versus G-CSF plus plerixafor - in patients with lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 174 lymphoma patients who underwent stem cell transplantation at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from 2010 to 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: G-CSF plus chemotherapy (n=129) and G-CSF plus plerixafor (n=45). Baseline demographics, CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency, time to hematopoietic recovery, transfusion requirements, incidence of fever and infections, hematologic abnormalities, immune reconstitution, and patient-reported QoL at 6 months were collected from de-identified medical records and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The G-CSF plus plerixafor group demonstrated significantly higher CD34+ cell counts at the first apheresis, higher total CD34+ cell yields, and a larger proportion of patients achieving ≥ 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> and ≥ 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg within 4 days compared with the G-CSF plus chemotherapy group. Hematological recovery (platelet and neutrophil engraftment) was faster in the plerixafor group. The plerixafor group also had shorter hospital stays, fewer febrile episodes during neutropenia, reduced antibiotic use, and higher lymphocyte counts at day 28 post-transplantion. The incidences of leukopenia, lymphopenia, anemia, and gastrointestinal adverse effects were lower in this group. Immune reconstitution, particularly CD4+ and CD8+ T cell recovery at 30 days, was improved post-transplant, and QoL scores at 6 months post-discharge were higher across physical, emotional, and social domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mobilization with G-CSF plus plerixafor is associated with higher CD34+ cell yields, faster hematologic and immune recovery, lower complication rates, and better QoL outcomes compared with G-CSF plus chemotherapy in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 9","pages":"4165-4181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12531286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of chemotherapy with G-CSF versus plerixafor with G-CSF in autologous stem cell mobilization for lymphoma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Zhao, Xiaolian Wen, Li Ma, Xiaojing Guo, Liping Su\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/XSXL9602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the efficacy, safety, hematological recovery, immune reconstitution, infection rates, and quality of life (QoL) between two stem cell mobilization regimens - granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus chemotherapy versus G-CSF plus plerixafor - in patients with lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 174 lymphoma patients who underwent stem cell transplantation at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from 2010 to 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: G-CSF plus chemotherapy (n=129) and G-CSF plus plerixafor (n=45). Baseline demographics, CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency, time to hematopoietic recovery, transfusion requirements, incidence of fever and infections, hematologic abnormalities, immune reconstitution, and patient-reported QoL at 6 months were collected from de-identified medical records and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The G-CSF plus plerixafor group demonstrated significantly higher CD34+ cell counts at the first apheresis, higher total CD34+ cell yields, and a larger proportion of patients achieving ≥ 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> and ≥ 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34+ cells/kg within 4 days compared with the G-CSF plus chemotherapy group. Hematological recovery (platelet and neutrophil engraftment) was faster in the plerixafor group. The plerixafor group also had shorter hospital stays, fewer febrile episodes during neutropenia, reduced antibiotic use, and higher lymphocyte counts at day 28 post-transplantion. The incidences of leukopenia, lymphopenia, anemia, and gastrointestinal adverse effects were lower in this group. Immune reconstitution, particularly CD4+ and CD8+ T cell recovery at 30 days, was improved post-transplant, and QoL scores at 6 months post-discharge were higher across physical, emotional, and social domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mobilization with G-CSF plus plerixafor is associated with higher CD34+ cell yields, faster hematologic and immune recovery, lower complication rates, and better QoL outcomes compared with G-CSF plus chemotherapy in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"4165-4181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12531286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/XSXL9602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/XSXL9602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of chemotherapy with G-CSF versus plerixafor with G-CSF in autologous stem cell mobilization for lymphoma patients.
Aims: To compare the efficacy, safety, hematological recovery, immune reconstitution, infection rates, and quality of life (QoL) between two stem cell mobilization regimens - granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus chemotherapy versus G-CSF plus plerixafor - in patients with lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 174 lymphoma patients who underwent stem cell transplantation at Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital from 2010 to 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: G-CSF plus chemotherapy (n=129) and G-CSF plus plerixafor (n=45). Baseline demographics, CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency, time to hematopoietic recovery, transfusion requirements, incidence of fever and infections, hematologic abnormalities, immune reconstitution, and patient-reported QoL at 6 months were collected from de-identified medical records and analyzed.
Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The G-CSF plus plerixafor group demonstrated significantly higher CD34+ cell counts at the first apheresis, higher total CD34+ cell yields, and a larger proportion of patients achieving ≥ 2 × 106 and ≥ 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg within 4 days compared with the G-CSF plus chemotherapy group. Hematological recovery (platelet and neutrophil engraftment) was faster in the plerixafor group. The plerixafor group also had shorter hospital stays, fewer febrile episodes during neutropenia, reduced antibiotic use, and higher lymphocyte counts at day 28 post-transplantion. The incidences of leukopenia, lymphopenia, anemia, and gastrointestinal adverse effects were lower in this group. Immune reconstitution, particularly CD4+ and CD8+ T cell recovery at 30 days, was improved post-transplant, and QoL scores at 6 months post-discharge were higher across physical, emotional, and social domains.
Conclusion: Mobilization with G-CSF plus plerixafor is associated with higher CD34+ cell yields, faster hematologic and immune recovery, lower complication rates, and better QoL outcomes compared with G-CSF plus chemotherapy in lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.