柱端铰节点控制摇钢筋混凝土框架设计流程及地震风险评估

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Liang Lu , Huayu Wang , Wanqiu Xia
{"title":"柱端铰节点控制摇钢筋混凝土框架设计流程及地震风险评估","authors":"Liang Lu ,&nbsp;Huayu Wang ,&nbsp;Wanqiu Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Controlled Rocking Reinforced Concrete Frame with Column-end hinge joint (CR-RCFC) is a newly developed rocking structural system, which has been proposed in the previous study. In this study, to promote its practical application, a two-stage design procedure for the CF-RCFC structure is proposed. The elastic design stage is the same as that of conventional structures, while the rocking design stage adopts a dual-performance design target based on the earthquake-reduction coefficient and inter-story drift ratio. Consequently, the seismic performance of the designed structure is studied by dynamic time-history analysis and the risk assessment is carried out by structural fragility assessment and site-based seismic hazard analysis. The dynamic time-history analysis results indicate that the acceleration response does not significantly increase as the floor rises, demonstrating that the column-end hinge effectively impedes the upward transmission of acceleration, thereby mitigating the acceleration response of the structural upper part. In the seismic risk assessment, the annual exceedance frequencies for Immediate Occupancy (IO), Life Safety (LS), and Collapse Prevention (CP) limit states are determined to be 1.88 × 10<sup>−3</sup>, 5.77 × 10<sup>−4</sup>, and 3.46 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, respectively. For the IO and LS limit states, the CR-RCFC structure exhibits higher annual exceedance frequencies than the conventional reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structure, whereas for the CP limit state, it shows lower annual exceedance frequencies. It indicates the CR-RCFC structure is particularly effective in reducing collapse risk during severe earthquakes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 110464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design procedure and seismic risk assessment of a controlled rocking reinforced concrete frame with column-end hinge joint\",\"authors\":\"Liang Lu ,&nbsp;Huayu Wang ,&nbsp;Wanqiu Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Controlled Rocking Reinforced Concrete Frame with Column-end hinge joint (CR-RCFC) is a newly developed rocking structural system, which has been proposed in the previous study. In this study, to promote its practical application, a two-stage design procedure for the CF-RCFC structure is proposed. The elastic design stage is the same as that of conventional structures, while the rocking design stage adopts a dual-performance design target based on the earthquake-reduction coefficient and inter-story drift ratio. Consequently, the seismic performance of the designed structure is studied by dynamic time-history analysis and the risk assessment is carried out by structural fragility assessment and site-based seismic hazard analysis. The dynamic time-history analysis results indicate that the acceleration response does not significantly increase as the floor rises, demonstrating that the column-end hinge effectively impedes the upward transmission of acceleration, thereby mitigating the acceleration response of the structural upper part. In the seismic risk assessment, the annual exceedance frequencies for Immediate Occupancy (IO), Life Safety (LS), and Collapse Prevention (CP) limit states are determined to be 1.88 × 10<sup>−3</sup>, 5.77 × 10<sup>−4</sup>, and 3.46 × 10<sup>−5</sup>, respectively. For the IO and LS limit states, the CR-RCFC structure exhibits higher annual exceedance frequencies than the conventional reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structure, whereas for the CP limit state, it shows lower annual exceedance frequencies. It indicates the CR-RCFC structure is particularly effective in reducing collapse risk during severe earthquakes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425022799\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425022799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

柱端铰节点可控摇摆钢筋混凝土框架(CR-RCFC)是近年来研究提出的一种新型摇摆结构体系。为了促进其实际应用,本文提出了CF-RCFC结构的两阶段设计方法。弹性设计阶段与常规结构相同,摇摆设计阶段采用基于减震系数和层间位移比的双性能设计目标。因此,通过动力时程分析研究设计结构的抗震性能,通过结构易损性评估和基于现场的地震危险性分析进行风险评估。动力时程分析结果表明,随着楼板的上升,加速度响应没有明显增加,说明柱端铰有效地阻止了加速度向上传递,从而减轻了结构上部的加速度响应。在地震风险评估中,确定了立即居住(IO)、生命安全(LS)和防止倒塌(CP)极限状态的年超出频率分别为1.88 × 10−3、5.77 × 10−4和3.46 × 10−5。对于IO和LS极限状态,CR-RCFC结构的年超越频率高于常规钢筋混凝土框架(RCF)结构,而对于CP极限状态,其年超越频率低于常规钢筋混凝土框架(RCF)结构。结果表明,CR-RCFC结构在降低强震时的倒塌风险方面特别有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design procedure and seismic risk assessment of a controlled rocking reinforced concrete frame with column-end hinge joint
The Controlled Rocking Reinforced Concrete Frame with Column-end hinge joint (CR-RCFC) is a newly developed rocking structural system, which has been proposed in the previous study. In this study, to promote its practical application, a two-stage design procedure for the CF-RCFC structure is proposed. The elastic design stage is the same as that of conventional structures, while the rocking design stage adopts a dual-performance design target based on the earthquake-reduction coefficient and inter-story drift ratio. Consequently, the seismic performance of the designed structure is studied by dynamic time-history analysis and the risk assessment is carried out by structural fragility assessment and site-based seismic hazard analysis. The dynamic time-history analysis results indicate that the acceleration response does not significantly increase as the floor rises, demonstrating that the column-end hinge effectively impedes the upward transmission of acceleration, thereby mitigating the acceleration response of the structural upper part. In the seismic risk assessment, the annual exceedance frequencies for Immediate Occupancy (IO), Life Safety (LS), and Collapse Prevention (CP) limit states are determined to be 1.88 × 10−3, 5.77 × 10−4, and 3.46 × 10−5, respectively. For the IO and LS limit states, the CR-RCFC structure exhibits higher annual exceedance frequencies than the conventional reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structure, whereas for the CP limit state, it shows lower annual exceedance frequencies. It indicates the CR-RCFC structure is particularly effective in reducing collapse risk during severe earthquakes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信