开发3D打印地聚合物混凝土的新型强度预测模型:可解释的数据驱动方法

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Md Nasir Uddin , Md Ibrahim Mostazid , Md Abdul Motaleb Faysal , Xijun Shi
{"title":"开发3D打印地聚合物混凝土的新型强度预测模型:可解释的数据驱动方法","authors":"Md Nasir Uddin ,&nbsp;Md Ibrahim Mostazid ,&nbsp;Md Abdul Motaleb Faysal ,&nbsp;Xijun Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>3D printed geopolymer concrete (3DP-GPC) offers the potential for faster construction and intricate design implementation. However, optimizing the mix design remains a major challenge due to the complexity of geopolymer chemistry and the reliance on trial-and-error experimentation. Prior studies using machine learning (ML) have largely focused on fiber-reinforced GPC, leaving plain 3DP-GPC underexplored despite its fundamental importance for material optimization in 3D printing. This study addresses this gap by systematically applying and comparing four gradient-boosting ML models, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and NGBoost, to predict compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) of plain 3DP-GPC. A dataset of over 500 entries was compiled from literature, normalized in terms of oxide composition of activators and curing parameters to reduce heterogeneity. The dataset was divided into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, with hyperparameter tuning performed via 5-fold cross-validation using GridSearchCV from Scikit-learn to ensure robust and computationally efficient model training. The models achieved high accuracy in predicting the CS of 3D-GPC, with R<sup>2</sup> values ranging from 0.900 to 0.902 (training) and 0.899–0.900 (testing). FS prediction was also promising, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.864–0.877 (training) and 0.791–0.808 (testing). SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis identified curing period, water-to-binder ratio, and activator modulus as the most influential parameters for CS, while binder type and curing conditions dominate FS. Overall, this work provides systematic and interpretable ML framework for plain 3DP-GPC. The findings offer practical insights into key governing parameters and present a data-driven tool to streamline mix design, reducing experimental workload and accelerating the adoption of sustainable 3D printing in construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 110405"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a novel strength predictive modeling for 3D printable geopolymer concrete: An interpretable data-driven approach\",\"authors\":\"Md Nasir Uddin ,&nbsp;Md Ibrahim Mostazid ,&nbsp;Md Abdul Motaleb Faysal ,&nbsp;Xijun Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>3D printed geopolymer concrete (3DP-GPC) offers the potential for faster construction and intricate design implementation. However, optimizing the mix design remains a major challenge due to the complexity of geopolymer chemistry and the reliance on trial-and-error experimentation. Prior studies using machine learning (ML) have largely focused on fiber-reinforced GPC, leaving plain 3DP-GPC underexplored despite its fundamental importance for material optimization in 3D printing. This study addresses this gap by systematically applying and comparing four gradient-boosting ML models, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and NGBoost, to predict compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) of plain 3DP-GPC. A dataset of over 500 entries was compiled from literature, normalized in terms of oxide composition of activators and curing parameters to reduce heterogeneity. The dataset was divided into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, with hyperparameter tuning performed via 5-fold cross-validation using GridSearchCV from Scikit-learn to ensure robust and computationally efficient model training. The models achieved high accuracy in predicting the CS of 3D-GPC, with R<sup>2</sup> values ranging from 0.900 to 0.902 (training) and 0.899–0.900 (testing). FS prediction was also promising, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.864–0.877 (training) and 0.791–0.808 (testing). SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis identified curing period, water-to-binder ratio, and activator modulus as the most influential parameters for CS, while binder type and curing conditions dominate FS. Overall, this work provides systematic and interpretable ML framework for plain 3DP-GPC. The findings offer practical insights into key governing parameters and present a data-driven tool to streamline mix design, reducing experimental workload and accelerating the adoption of sustainable 3D printing in construction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425022209\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425022209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

3D打印地聚合物混凝土(3D - gpc)为更快的施工和复杂的设计实施提供了潜力。然而,由于地聚合物化学的复杂性和对反复试验的依赖,优化混合设计仍然是一个主要挑战。先前使用机器学习(ML)的研究主要集中在纤维增强GPC上,尽管普通的3D -GPC对于3D打印中的材料优化具有重要意义,但仍未得到充分的探索。本研究通过系统地应用和比较四种梯度增强ML模型,XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost和NGBoost,来预测普通3d - gpc的抗压强度(CS)和抗弯强度(FS),从而解决了这一差距。从文献中编译了超过500个条目的数据集,根据活化剂的氧化物组成和固化参数进行了规范化,以减少异质性。数据集被分为训练子集(80 %)和测试子集(20 %),使用Scikit-learn的GridSearchCV通过5倍交叉验证进行超参数调优,以确保鲁棒性和计算效率高的模型训练。模型对3D-GPC CS的预测精度较高,R2值在0.900 ~ 0.902(训练)和0.899 ~ 0.900(测试)之间。FS预测也很有希望,R2值为0.864-0.877(训练)和0.791-0.808(测试)。Shapley添加剂解释(Shapley Additive Explanations)分析发现,固化时间、水胶比和活化剂模量是影响CS的主要参数,而粘合剂类型和固化条件是影响FS的主要参数。总的来说,这项工作为普通3d - gpc提供了系统和可解释的ML框架。研究结果为关键控制参数提供了实用的见解,并提供了一种数据驱动的工具,以简化混合设计,减少实验工作量,加速可持续3D打印在建筑中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a novel strength predictive modeling for 3D printable geopolymer concrete: An interpretable data-driven approach
3D printed geopolymer concrete (3DP-GPC) offers the potential for faster construction and intricate design implementation. However, optimizing the mix design remains a major challenge due to the complexity of geopolymer chemistry and the reliance on trial-and-error experimentation. Prior studies using machine learning (ML) have largely focused on fiber-reinforced GPC, leaving plain 3DP-GPC underexplored despite its fundamental importance for material optimization in 3D printing. This study addresses this gap by systematically applying and comparing four gradient-boosting ML models, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and NGBoost, to predict compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) of plain 3DP-GPC. A dataset of over 500 entries was compiled from literature, normalized in terms of oxide composition of activators and curing parameters to reduce heterogeneity. The dataset was divided into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, with hyperparameter tuning performed via 5-fold cross-validation using GridSearchCV from Scikit-learn to ensure robust and computationally efficient model training. The models achieved high accuracy in predicting the CS of 3D-GPC, with R2 values ranging from 0.900 to 0.902 (training) and 0.899–0.900 (testing). FS prediction was also promising, with R2 values of 0.864–0.877 (training) and 0.791–0.808 (testing). SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis identified curing period, water-to-binder ratio, and activator modulus as the most influential parameters for CS, while binder type and curing conditions dominate FS. Overall, this work provides systematic and interpretable ML framework for plain 3DP-GPC. The findings offer practical insights into key governing parameters and present a data-driven tool to streamline mix design, reducing experimental workload and accelerating the adoption of sustainable 3D printing in construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信