胃切除术对经手术证实的IV期胃癌的临床影响:来自韩国多中心数据集(PASS-META)的回顾性分析

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sung Eun Kim, In-Seob Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Han Hong Lee, Oh Jeong, Mi Ran Jung, Hoon Hur
{"title":"胃切除术对经手术证实的IV期胃癌的临床影响:来自韩国多中心数据集(PASS-META)的回顾性分析","authors":"Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sung Eun Kim, In-Seob Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Han Hong Lee, Oh Jeong, Mi Ran Jung, Hoon Hur","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01676-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative resection for metastatic gastric cancer is not recommended in current practice guidelines; however, it is frequently performed based on clinical considerations. Prospective trials face challenges, necessitating large-scale retrospective analyses to provide clinical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PASS-META study group established a cohort of 983 patients with gastric cancer with surgically confirmed metastatic lesions treated at five major Korean institutions from 2014 to 2021, collecting 126 variables from preoperative, operative, and postoperative data through hospital records. The correlation between gastrectomy and survival outcomes was investigated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and standardization to estimate counterfactual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machine learning-based imputation and statistical causal survival analysis revealed that gastrectomy was found to significantly improve survival in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (P1 or P2; RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), as well as in those with distant lymph node metastasis (dLN1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.94) and hepatic metastasis (H1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.00), suggesting a potential survival advantage across these subgroups. No survival benefit was observed in patients with severe peritoneal metastasis (P3). Among patients with P1-P2 metastasis, extensive lymph node dissection improved the 5-year survival rates compared with limited dissection, whereas minimally invasive surgery did not affect the survival outcome. Although gastrectomy increased the postoperative hospital stay and delayed the initiation of the first postoperative chemotherapy compared to patients without gastrectomy, it did not affect the total number of chemotherapy cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that gastrectomy offers a significant survival benefit to patients with surgically proven stage IV gastric cancer and limited peritoneal metastasis (P1/P2), distant lymph node (dLN1), or hepatic metastases (H1). Furthermore, specific surgical procedures such as extended lymph node dissection or minimally invasive surgery may be considered for patients undergoing gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical impact of gastrectomy in surgically proven stage IV gastric cancers: retrospective analysis from Korean multicenter dataset (PASS-META).\",\"authors\":\"Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sung Eun Kim, In-Seob Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Han Hong Lee, Oh Jeong, Mi Ran Jung, Hoon Hur\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10120-025-01676-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative resection for metastatic gastric cancer is not recommended in current practice guidelines; however, it is frequently performed based on clinical considerations. Prospective trials face challenges, necessitating large-scale retrospective analyses to provide clinical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PASS-META study group established a cohort of 983 patients with gastric cancer with surgically confirmed metastatic lesions treated at five major Korean institutions from 2014 to 2021, collecting 126 variables from preoperative, operative, and postoperative data through hospital records. The correlation between gastrectomy and survival outcomes was investigated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and standardization to estimate counterfactual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machine learning-based imputation and statistical causal survival analysis revealed that gastrectomy was found to significantly improve survival in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (P1 or P2; RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), as well as in those with distant lymph node metastasis (dLN1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.94) and hepatic metastasis (H1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.00), suggesting a potential survival advantage across these subgroups. No survival benefit was observed in patients with severe peritoneal metastasis (P3). Among patients with P1-P2 metastasis, extensive lymph node dissection improved the 5-year survival rates compared with limited dissection, whereas minimally invasive surgery did not affect the survival outcome. Although gastrectomy increased the postoperative hospital stay and delayed the initiation of the first postoperative chemotherapy compared to patients without gastrectomy, it did not affect the total number of chemotherapy cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that gastrectomy offers a significant survival benefit to patients with surgically proven stage IV gastric cancer and limited peritoneal metastasis (P1/P2), distant lymph node (dLN1), or hepatic metastases (H1). Furthermore, specific surgical procedures such as extended lymph node dissection or minimally invasive surgery may be considered for patients undergoing gastrectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01676-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01676-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前的实践指南不推荐姑息性切除转移性胃癌;然而,它经常是基于临床考虑进行的。前瞻性试验面临挑战,需要大规模的回顾性分析来提供临床证据。方法:PASS-META研究组通过医院记录收集术前、术中、术后126个变量,建立了2014 - 2021年在韩国5家主要机构治疗的983例手术证实转移性胃癌患者的队列。使用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)和标准化来估计反事实结果,研究胃切除术与生存结果之间的相关性。结果:基于机器学习的归算和统计因果生存分析显示,胃切除术可显著提高有限腹膜转移(P1或P2; RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94)以及远处淋巴结转移(dLN1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.94)和肝转移(H1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.00)患者的生存率,表明这些亚组存在潜在的生存优势。严重腹膜转移(P3)患者未观察到生存获益。在P1-P2转移患者中,与有限清扫相比,广泛淋巴结清扫可提高5年生存率,而微创手术不影响生存结果。虽然与未行胃切除术的患者相比,胃切除术增加了术后住院时间,延迟了术后首次化疗的开始时间,但不影响化疗总周期数。结论:本研究表明,对于手术证实的IV期胃癌和有限腹膜转移(P1/P2)、远处淋巴结(dLN1)或肝转移(H1)的患者,胃切除术可显著提高生存期。此外,可以考虑对胃切除术患者进行特定的外科手术,如扩大淋巴结清扫或微创手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical impact of gastrectomy in surgically proven stage IV gastric cancers: retrospective analysis from Korean multicenter dataset (PASS-META).

Background: Palliative resection for metastatic gastric cancer is not recommended in current practice guidelines; however, it is frequently performed based on clinical considerations. Prospective trials face challenges, necessitating large-scale retrospective analyses to provide clinical evidence.

Methods: The PASS-META study group established a cohort of 983 patients with gastric cancer with surgically confirmed metastatic lesions treated at five major Korean institutions from 2014 to 2021, collecting 126 variables from preoperative, operative, and postoperative data through hospital records. The correlation between gastrectomy and survival outcomes was investigated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and standardization to estimate counterfactual outcomes.

Results: Machine learning-based imputation and statistical causal survival analysis revealed that gastrectomy was found to significantly improve survival in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (P1 or P2; RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), as well as in those with distant lymph node metastasis (dLN1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.94) and hepatic metastasis (H1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.00), suggesting a potential survival advantage across these subgroups. No survival benefit was observed in patients with severe peritoneal metastasis (P3). Among patients with P1-P2 metastasis, extensive lymph node dissection improved the 5-year survival rates compared with limited dissection, whereas minimally invasive surgery did not affect the survival outcome. Although gastrectomy increased the postoperative hospital stay and delayed the initiation of the first postoperative chemotherapy compared to patients without gastrectomy, it did not affect the total number of chemotherapy cycles.

Conclusion: This study suggests that gastrectomy offers a significant survival benefit to patients with surgically proven stage IV gastric cancer and limited peritoneal metastasis (P1/P2), distant lymph node (dLN1), or hepatic metastases (H1). Furthermore, specific surgical procedures such as extended lymph node dissection or minimally invasive surgery may be considered for patients undergoing gastrectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide. The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics. Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field. With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信