巨细胞动脉炎组织的空间分析揭示了免疫异质性和糖皮质激素反应的潜在预测因素。

IF 20.6 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Cecilia Ansalone, Samuel McAllister, Ethan S Pickerill, Lin Zhang, David C Gemperline, Annie Peacock, Ishita Gupta, Dominic Mcgovern, Victoria Kellior, Evelyn Qian, Aysin Tulunay Virlan, Maria Laura Vieri, Holly Leslie, Yoana Doncheva, Claire Kennedy Dietrich, Sylvia Wright, Paul Cauchi, Timothy Beckman, Lisa Hutton, John Cole, Nigel B Jamieson, Isabella H Wulur, Ajay Nirula, Iain B McInnes, Robert J Benschop, Carl S Goodyear, Neil Basu
{"title":"巨细胞动脉炎组织的空间分析揭示了免疫异质性和糖皮质激素反应的潜在预测因素。","authors":"Cecilia Ansalone, Samuel McAllister, Ethan S Pickerill, Lin Zhang, David C Gemperline, Annie Peacock, Ishita Gupta, Dominic Mcgovern, Victoria Kellior, Evelyn Qian, Aysin Tulunay Virlan, Maria Laura Vieri, Holly Leslie, Yoana Doncheva, Claire Kennedy Dietrich, Sylvia Wright, Paul Cauchi, Timothy Beckman, Lisa Hutton, John Cole, Nigel B Jamieson, Isabella H Wulur, Ajay Nirula, Iain B McInnes, Robert J Benschop, Carl S Goodyear, Neil Basu","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an immune-mediated vasculitis of large- and medium-sized arteries that can lead to systemic symptoms and irreversible vision loss. Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the primary treatment but fail to induce sustained remission (SR) in approximately half of patients, resulting in disease relapses and significant treatment-related toxicity. We aimed to identify tissue-based markers at disease onset capable of distinguishing patients who later achieve SR from those who do not (non-remission [NR]) under GC monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using spatial biology techniques, we performed a comprehensive analysis of GCA-affected arterial tissues obtained at disease onset, correlating molecular profiles with clinical trajectory. We compared gene expression and immune cell populations between SR and NR groups, corroborated key findings by immunohistochemistry, and evaluated the diagnostic performance of identified biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with NR exhibited an upregulation of extracellular matrix remodelling (ECM) and T cell activation pathways, reflecting persistent inflammation and fibrotic-like responses. By contrast, SR cases were distinguished by an enrichment of immunoglobulin G-producing plasma cells in the adventitia, which correlated with increased macrophage infiltration in the intima. Quantitative analyses suggested that combining plasma cell and macrophage markers could accurately predict GC responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal an immunopathologic signature in GCA at diagnosis, characterised by plasma cell-rich infiltrates associated with favourable outcomes, and ECM- and T cell-associated inflammation enriched in GC-refractory cases. These insights could foster a precision medicine approach to GCA management, enabling patient stratification for GC-sparing therapies and optimising patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial profiling of giant cell arteritis tissues reveals immune heterogeneity and potential predictors of glucocorticoid response.\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Ansalone, Samuel McAllister, Ethan S Pickerill, Lin Zhang, David C Gemperline, Annie Peacock, Ishita Gupta, Dominic Mcgovern, Victoria Kellior, Evelyn Qian, Aysin Tulunay Virlan, Maria Laura Vieri, Holly Leslie, Yoana Doncheva, Claire Kennedy Dietrich, Sylvia Wright, Paul Cauchi, Timothy Beckman, Lisa Hutton, John Cole, Nigel B Jamieson, Isabella H Wulur, Ajay Nirula, Iain B McInnes, Robert J Benschop, Carl S Goodyear, Neil Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ard.2025.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an immune-mediated vasculitis of large- and medium-sized arteries that can lead to systemic symptoms and irreversible vision loss. Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the primary treatment but fail to induce sustained remission (SR) in approximately half of patients, resulting in disease relapses and significant treatment-related toxicity. We aimed to identify tissue-based markers at disease onset capable of distinguishing patients who later achieve SR from those who do not (non-remission [NR]) under GC monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using spatial biology techniques, we performed a comprehensive analysis of GCA-affected arterial tissues obtained at disease onset, correlating molecular profiles with clinical trajectory. We compared gene expression and immune cell populations between SR and NR groups, corroborated key findings by immunohistochemistry, and evaluated the diagnostic performance of identified biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with NR exhibited an upregulation of extracellular matrix remodelling (ECM) and T cell activation pathways, reflecting persistent inflammation and fibrotic-like responses. By contrast, SR cases were distinguished by an enrichment of immunoglobulin G-producing plasma cells in the adventitia, which correlated with increased macrophage infiltration in the intima. Quantitative analyses suggested that combining plasma cell and macrophage markers could accurately predict GC responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal an immunopathologic signature in GCA at diagnosis, characterised by plasma cell-rich infiltrates associated with favourable outcomes, and ECM- and T cell-associated inflammation enriched in GC-refractory cases. These insights could foster a precision medicine approach to GCA management, enabling patient stratification for GC-sparing therapies and optimising patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.09.009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)是一种免疫介导的大中型动脉血管炎,可导致全身症状和不可逆的视力丧失。糖皮质激素(GCs)仍然是主要的治疗方法,但在大约一半的患者中未能诱导持续缓解(SR),导致疾病复发和显著的治疗相关毒性。我们的目的是在疾病发病时识别基于组织的标志物,能够区分在GC单药治疗下后来实现SR的患者和未实现SR的患者(非缓解[NR])。方法:利用空间生物学技术,我们对发病时获得的gca影响的动脉组织进行了全面分析,将分子特征与临床轨迹联系起来。我们比较了SR组和NR组之间的基因表达和免疫细胞群,通过免疫组织化学证实了关键发现,并评估了鉴定的生物标志物的诊断性能。结果:NR患者表现出细胞外基质重塑(ECM)和T细胞激活途径的上调,反映出持续的炎症和纤维化样反应。相比之下,SR病例的特征是外膜中产生免疫球蛋白g的浆细胞丰富,这与内膜中巨噬细胞浸润增加有关。定量分析表明,结合浆细胞和巨噬细胞标志物可以准确预测GC反应性。结论:我们的研究结果揭示了GCA诊断时的免疫病理学特征,其特征是富含浆细胞的浸润与良好的预后相关,而在gc难治性病例中,ECM和T细胞相关炎症丰富。这些见解可以促进GCA管理的精准医学方法,使患者分层以节省gc治疗并优化患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial profiling of giant cell arteritis tissues reveals immune heterogeneity and potential predictors of glucocorticoid response.

Objectives: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an immune-mediated vasculitis of large- and medium-sized arteries that can lead to systemic symptoms and irreversible vision loss. Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the primary treatment but fail to induce sustained remission (SR) in approximately half of patients, resulting in disease relapses and significant treatment-related toxicity. We aimed to identify tissue-based markers at disease onset capable of distinguishing patients who later achieve SR from those who do not (non-remission [NR]) under GC monotherapy.

Methods: Using spatial biology techniques, we performed a comprehensive analysis of GCA-affected arterial tissues obtained at disease onset, correlating molecular profiles with clinical trajectory. We compared gene expression and immune cell populations between SR and NR groups, corroborated key findings by immunohistochemistry, and evaluated the diagnostic performance of identified biomarkers.

Results: Patients with NR exhibited an upregulation of extracellular matrix remodelling (ECM) and T cell activation pathways, reflecting persistent inflammation and fibrotic-like responses. By contrast, SR cases were distinguished by an enrichment of immunoglobulin G-producing plasma cells in the adventitia, which correlated with increased macrophage infiltration in the intima. Quantitative analyses suggested that combining plasma cell and macrophage markers could accurately predict GC responsiveness.

Conclusions: Our findings reveal an immunopathologic signature in GCA at diagnosis, characterised by plasma cell-rich infiltrates associated with favourable outcomes, and ECM- and T cell-associated inflammation enriched in GC-refractory cases. These insights could foster a precision medicine approach to GCA management, enabling patient stratification for GC-sparing therapies and optimising patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信