Xing Shu , Shuang Li , Zewen Pan , Hao Peng , Jiayi Zhou , Can Wang , Mingfang Xiang
{"title":"非药物干预缓解重症监护病房患者口渴的有效性:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Xing Shu , Shuang Li , Zewen Pan , Hao Peng , Jiayi Zhou , Can Wang , Mingfang Xiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Thirst is a prevalent and clinically significant symptom among intensive care unit patients. However, the comparative effectiveness of various non-pharmacological interventions for relieving thirst remains largely unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for thirst alleviation in intensive care unit patients through a synthesis of direct and indirect evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>A comprehensive search of sixteen electronic databases and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> was conducted for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 20, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>Screening, data extraction, coding, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and in duplicate. The primary analysis utilized random-effects network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing thirst intensity. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) online tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024606388).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 14 studies, encompassing 1642 critically ill patients, met the inclusion criteria and evaluated 13 non-pharmacological interventions for thirst alleviation. Compared to routine oral care, the following interventions showed statistically significant efficacy (all <em>P</em> < 0.05), ordered by their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): mint liquid spray (82.4 %), room temperature water spray (82.3 %), menthol lozenge (81 %), lemon liquid spray (78.8 %), drinking a little ice-cold water (65.3 %), and ice-cold water spray (51.3 %). The CINeMA assessment indicated that the overall certainty of the evidence remained low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This network meta-analysis suggests that mint liquid spray may appear to offer benefits for relieving thirst among ICU patients, indicating that spray-based moisturization is a promising strategy. We advocate for comprehensive ICU oral care, emphasizing tailored interventions and the integration of low-temperature and menthol adjuncts into standard care protocols. Such strategies may help alleviate thirst-related distress and optimize critical care outcomes. However, further high-quality, standardized studies are required to verify these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 105245"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for relieving thirst in intensive care unit patients: A network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xing Shu , Shuang Li , Zewen Pan , Hao Peng , Jiayi Zhou , Can Wang , Mingfang Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Thirst is a prevalent and clinically significant symptom among intensive care unit patients. However, the comparative effectiveness of various non-pharmacological interventions for relieving thirst remains largely unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for thirst alleviation in intensive care unit patients through a synthesis of direct and indirect evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and network meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>A comprehensive search of sixteen electronic databases and <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> was conducted for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 20, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Review methods</h3><div>Screening, data extraction, coding, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and in duplicate. The primary analysis utilized random-effects network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing thirst intensity. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) online tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024606388).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 14 studies, encompassing 1642 critically ill patients, met the inclusion criteria and evaluated 13 non-pharmacological interventions for thirst alleviation. Compared to routine oral care, the following interventions showed statistically significant efficacy (all <em>P</em> < 0.05), ordered by their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): mint liquid spray (82.4 %), room temperature water spray (82.3 %), menthol lozenge (81 %), lemon liquid spray (78.8 %), drinking a little ice-cold water (65.3 %), and ice-cold water spray (51.3 %). The CINeMA assessment indicated that the overall certainty of the evidence remained low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This network meta-analysis suggests that mint liquid spray may appear to offer benefits for relieving thirst among ICU patients, indicating that spray-based moisturization is a promising strategy. We advocate for comprehensive ICU oral care, emphasizing tailored interventions and the integration of low-temperature and menthol adjuncts into standard care protocols. Such strategies may help alleviate thirst-related distress and optimize critical care outcomes. However, further high-quality, standardized studies are required to verify these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002074892500255X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002074892500255X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for relieving thirst in intensive care unit patients: A network meta-analysis
Background
Thirst is a prevalent and clinically significant symptom among intensive care unit patients. However, the comparative effectiveness of various non-pharmacological interventions for relieving thirst remains largely unclear.
Objectives
To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for thirst alleviation in intensive care unit patients through a synthesis of direct and indirect evidence.
Design
A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Data sources
A comprehensive search of sixteen electronic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 20, 2024.
Review methods
Screening, data extraction, coding, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently and in duplicate. The primary analysis utilized random-effects network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing thirst intensity. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) online tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024606388).
Results
A total of 14 studies, encompassing 1642 critically ill patients, met the inclusion criteria and evaluated 13 non-pharmacological interventions for thirst alleviation. Compared to routine oral care, the following interventions showed statistically significant efficacy (all P < 0.05), ordered by their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): mint liquid spray (82.4 %), room temperature water spray (82.3 %), menthol lozenge (81 %), lemon liquid spray (78.8 %), drinking a little ice-cold water (65.3 %), and ice-cold water spray (51.3 %). The CINeMA assessment indicated that the overall certainty of the evidence remained low.
Conclusions
This network meta-analysis suggests that mint liquid spray may appear to offer benefits for relieving thirst among ICU patients, indicating that spray-based moisturization is a promising strategy. We advocate for comprehensive ICU oral care, emphasizing tailored interventions and the integration of low-temperature and menthol adjuncts into standard care protocols. Such strategies may help alleviate thirst-related distress and optimize critical care outcomes. However, further high-quality, standardized studies are required to verify these findings.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).