Juan F Vesga,Mona Salaheldin Mohamed,Monica Shandal,Elias Jabbour,Nino Lomtadze,Mmamapudi Kubjane,Anete Trajman,Gesine Meyer-Rath,Zaza Avaliani,Wesley Rotich,Daniel Mwai,Julio Croda,Hlengani T Mathema,Immaculate Kathure,Rhoda Pola,Fernanda Dockhorn Costa,Norbert O Ndjeka,Maka Danelia,Maiko L Tonini,Nelly Solomonia,Daniele M Pelissari,Dennis Falzon,Cecily Miller,Ines Garcia Baena,Nimalan Arinaminpathy,Kevin Schwartzman,Saskia Den Boon,Jonathon R Campbell
{"title":"巴西、格鲁吉亚、肯尼亚和南非扩大结核病筛查和预防性治疗的有效性、成本效益、预算影响和投资回报:一项模型研究。","authors":"Juan F Vesga,Mona Salaheldin Mohamed,Monica Shandal,Elias Jabbour,Nino Lomtadze,Mmamapudi Kubjane,Anete Trajman,Gesine Meyer-Rath,Zaza Avaliani,Wesley Rotich,Daniel Mwai,Julio Croda,Hlengani T Mathema,Immaculate Kathure,Rhoda Pola,Fernanda Dockhorn Costa,Norbert O Ndjeka,Maka Danelia,Maiko L Tonini,Nelly Solomonia,Daniele M Pelissari,Dennis Falzon,Cecily Miller,Ines Garcia Baena,Nimalan Arinaminpathy,Kevin Schwartzman,Saskia Den Boon,Jonathon R Campbell","doi":"10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00321-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nClosing the tuberculosis diagnostic gap and scaling up tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) are two global priorities to end tuberculosis. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and societal return on investment of a comprehensive intervention to improve tuberculosis screening and prevention in Brazil, Georgia, Kenya, and South Africa-four distinct epidemiological settings.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this modelling study, in partnership with national tuberculosis programmes we defined a set of interventions (the intervention package) related to tuberculosis screening and TPT in three priority populations: people with HIV, household contacts, and a country-defined high-risk population (people deprived of liberty [Brazil], people accessing care for injection drug use [Georgia], people in informal settlements in nine districts with a high prevalence of tuberculosis [Kenya], and people in the 22 subdistricts with the highest prevalence of tuberculosis [South Africa]). We developed transmission models calibrated to country-specific epidemiology and collated cost data for tuberculosis-related activities and patient costs in 2023 US dollars (US$). We compared the intervention package scaled up to reach all priority populations by 2030 to a status quo scenario based on projected tuberculosis epidemiology over a 27-year time horizon (Jan 1, 2024, to Dec 31, 2050); to delineate the impact of intervention components, we also evaluated the intervention package without TPT. Outcomes were health system and societal costs, number of tuberculosis episodes, tuberculosis deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). We calculated the budget impact, health system cost per DALY averted, and societal return on the health system investment for each country. Outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nWith the status quo scenario, by 2050, tuberculosis incidence is projected to be 41 per 100 000 population (95% uncertainty range 32-53) in Brazil, 45 per 100 000 population (36-60) in Georgia, 214 per 100 000 population (146-266) in Kenya, and 261 per 100 000 population (133-406) in South Africa. The percentage of all tuberculosis episodes prevented by implementing the intervention package in all priority populations is projected to be 15·0% (12·8-17·5) in Brazil, 14·3% (13·1-15·8) in Georgia, 21·3% (15·2-27·6) in Kenya, and 26·4% (21·1-31·8) in South Africa by 2050. If implemented without TPT (ie, tuberculosis disease screening alone), corresponding reductions were lower at 10·4% (8·6-12·2) in Brazil, 10·2% (9·5-11·2) in Georgia, 12·6% (9·5-15·9) in Kenya, and 16·8% (13·0-20·4) in South Africa. In 2030, the percentage of the national tuberculosis programme budget required for the intervention package was 62% in Brazil, 10% in Georgia, 67% in Kenya, and 44% South Africa. The incremental cost per DALY averted of the intervention package compared with the status quo in all priority populations is $386 in Brazil, $491 in Georgia, $53 in Kenya, and $160 in South Africa. The corresponding societal return per health system dollar invested is projected to be $51 in Brazil, $8 in Georgia, $27 in Kenya, and $54 in South Africa.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nScaling up tuberculosis screening and TPT requires substantial investment but is projected to be cost-effective compared with the status quo, to greatly reduce tuberculosis incidence, and to provide large returns on investment.\r\n\r\nFUNDING\r\nWorld Health Organization.","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"65 1","pages":"e1857-e1868"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and return on investment of scaling up tuberculosis screening and preventive treatment in Brazil, Georgia, Kenya, and South Africa: a modelling study.\",\"authors\":\"Juan F Vesga,Mona Salaheldin Mohamed,Monica Shandal,Elias Jabbour,Nino Lomtadze,Mmamapudi Kubjane,Anete Trajman,Gesine Meyer-Rath,Zaza Avaliani,Wesley Rotich,Daniel Mwai,Julio Croda,Hlengani T Mathema,Immaculate Kathure,Rhoda Pola,Fernanda Dockhorn Costa,Norbert O Ndjeka,Maka Danelia,Maiko L Tonini,Nelly Solomonia,Daniele M Pelissari,Dennis Falzon,Cecily Miller,Ines Garcia Baena,Nimalan Arinaminpathy,Kevin Schwartzman,Saskia Den Boon,Jonathon R Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00321-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nClosing the tuberculosis diagnostic gap and scaling up tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) are two global priorities to end tuberculosis. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and societal return on investment of a comprehensive intervention to improve tuberculosis screening and prevention in Brazil, Georgia, Kenya, and South Africa-four distinct epidemiological settings.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nIn this modelling study, in partnership with national tuberculosis programmes we defined a set of interventions (the intervention package) related to tuberculosis screening and TPT in three priority populations: people with HIV, household contacts, and a country-defined high-risk population (people deprived of liberty [Brazil], people accessing care for injection drug use [Georgia], people in informal settlements in nine districts with a high prevalence of tuberculosis [Kenya], and people in the 22 subdistricts with the highest prevalence of tuberculosis [South Africa]). We developed transmission models calibrated to country-specific epidemiology and collated cost data for tuberculosis-related activities and patient costs in 2023 US dollars (US$). We compared the intervention package scaled up to reach all priority populations by 2030 to a status quo scenario based on projected tuberculosis epidemiology over a 27-year time horizon (Jan 1, 2024, to Dec 31, 2050); to delineate the impact of intervention components, we also evaluated the intervention package without TPT. Outcomes were health system and societal costs, number of tuberculosis episodes, tuberculosis deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). We calculated the budget impact, health system cost per DALY averted, and societal return on the health system investment for each country. Outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum.\\r\\n\\r\\nFINDINGS\\r\\nWith the status quo scenario, by 2050, tuberculosis incidence is projected to be 41 per 100 000 population (95% uncertainty range 32-53) in Brazil, 45 per 100 000 population (36-60) in Georgia, 214 per 100 000 population (146-266) in Kenya, and 261 per 100 000 population (133-406) in South Africa. The percentage of all tuberculosis episodes prevented by implementing the intervention package in all priority populations is projected to be 15·0% (12·8-17·5) in Brazil, 14·3% (13·1-15·8) in Georgia, 21·3% (15·2-27·6) in Kenya, and 26·4% (21·1-31·8) in South Africa by 2050. If implemented without TPT (ie, tuberculosis disease screening alone), corresponding reductions were lower at 10·4% (8·6-12·2) in Brazil, 10·2% (9·5-11·2) in Georgia, 12·6% (9·5-15·9) in Kenya, and 16·8% (13·0-20·4) in South Africa. In 2030, the percentage of the national tuberculosis programme budget required for the intervention package was 62% in Brazil, 10% in Georgia, 67% in Kenya, and 44% South Africa. The incremental cost per DALY averted of the intervention package compared with the status quo in all priority populations is $386 in Brazil, $491 in Georgia, $53 in Kenya, and $160 in South Africa. The corresponding societal return per health system dollar invested is projected to be $51 in Brazil, $8 in Georgia, $27 in Kenya, and $54 in South Africa.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERPRETATION\\r\\nScaling up tuberculosis screening and TPT requires substantial investment but is projected to be cost-effective compared with the status quo, to greatly reduce tuberculosis incidence, and to provide large returns on investment.\\r\\n\\r\\nFUNDING\\r\\nWorld Health Organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Global Health\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"e1857-e1868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00321-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00321-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and return on investment of scaling up tuberculosis screening and preventive treatment in Brazil, Georgia, Kenya, and South Africa: a modelling study.
BACKGROUND
Closing the tuberculosis diagnostic gap and scaling up tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) are two global priorities to end tuberculosis. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and societal return on investment of a comprehensive intervention to improve tuberculosis screening and prevention in Brazil, Georgia, Kenya, and South Africa-four distinct epidemiological settings.
METHODS
In this modelling study, in partnership with national tuberculosis programmes we defined a set of interventions (the intervention package) related to tuberculosis screening and TPT in three priority populations: people with HIV, household contacts, and a country-defined high-risk population (people deprived of liberty [Brazil], people accessing care for injection drug use [Georgia], people in informal settlements in nine districts with a high prevalence of tuberculosis [Kenya], and people in the 22 subdistricts with the highest prevalence of tuberculosis [South Africa]). We developed transmission models calibrated to country-specific epidemiology and collated cost data for tuberculosis-related activities and patient costs in 2023 US dollars (US$). We compared the intervention package scaled up to reach all priority populations by 2030 to a status quo scenario based on projected tuberculosis epidemiology over a 27-year time horizon (Jan 1, 2024, to Dec 31, 2050); to delineate the impact of intervention components, we also evaluated the intervention package without TPT. Outcomes were health system and societal costs, number of tuberculosis episodes, tuberculosis deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). We calculated the budget impact, health system cost per DALY averted, and societal return on the health system investment for each country. Outcomes were discounted at 3% per annum.
FINDINGS
With the status quo scenario, by 2050, tuberculosis incidence is projected to be 41 per 100 000 population (95% uncertainty range 32-53) in Brazil, 45 per 100 000 population (36-60) in Georgia, 214 per 100 000 population (146-266) in Kenya, and 261 per 100 000 population (133-406) in South Africa. The percentage of all tuberculosis episodes prevented by implementing the intervention package in all priority populations is projected to be 15·0% (12·8-17·5) in Brazil, 14·3% (13·1-15·8) in Georgia, 21·3% (15·2-27·6) in Kenya, and 26·4% (21·1-31·8) in South Africa by 2050. If implemented without TPT (ie, tuberculosis disease screening alone), corresponding reductions were lower at 10·4% (8·6-12·2) in Brazil, 10·2% (9·5-11·2) in Georgia, 12·6% (9·5-15·9) in Kenya, and 16·8% (13·0-20·4) in South Africa. In 2030, the percentage of the national tuberculosis programme budget required for the intervention package was 62% in Brazil, 10% in Georgia, 67% in Kenya, and 44% South Africa. The incremental cost per DALY averted of the intervention package compared with the status quo in all priority populations is $386 in Brazil, $491 in Georgia, $53 in Kenya, and $160 in South Africa. The corresponding societal return per health system dollar invested is projected to be $51 in Brazil, $8 in Georgia, $27 in Kenya, and $54 in South Africa.
INTERPRETATION
Scaling up tuberculosis screening and TPT requires substantial investment but is projected to be cost-effective compared with the status quo, to greatly reduce tuberculosis incidence, and to provide large returns on investment.
FUNDING
World Health Organization.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts.
The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.