利用人工智能加强放射肿瘤学教育:应用、局限性和未来方向综述。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Zhi Xuan Ng, Ivy Weishan Ng, Teng Hwee Tan
{"title":"利用人工智能加强放射肿瘤学教育:应用、局限性和未来方向综述。","authors":"Zhi Xuan Ng, Ivy Weishan Ng, Teng Hwee Tan","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence [AI] is increasingly integrated into radiation oncology practice, from auto-contouring and treatment planning to decision support. However, formal residency training has not kept pace with these advances, leaving educational gaps in preparing future radiation oncologists for AI-informed clinical practice. This review aims to review current applications of AI in radiation oncology and evaluate how AI-driven tools can enhance resident education in clinical, procedural, and research domains. A narrative literature review was conducted across major databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL] using keywords including \"artificial intelligence,\" \"medical education,\" \"radiation oncology,\" and \"auto-contouring.\" Expert commentary and selected studies on educational implementation of AI were included. AI enhanced learning tools span auto-segmentation feedback systems, plan optimization simulators and clinical decision support engines. AI improves access to complex cases, supports real-time feedback, and reduces dependence on faculty availability. However, risks include overreliance, algorithmic bias, and misinterpretation of AI generated outputs. Residents must develop the skills to critically appraise AI tools, review outputs, and integrate patient-centered decision making. AI offers significant potential to transform resident education in radiation oncology. Structured curriculum integration can enhance training while preserving core clinical judgment. Faculty development and institutional support are critical to successful implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Radiation Oncology Education Through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Xuan Ng, Ivy Weishan Ng, Teng Hwee Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence [AI] is increasingly integrated into radiation oncology practice, from auto-contouring and treatment planning to decision support. However, formal residency training has not kept pace with these advances, leaving educational gaps in preparing future radiation oncologists for AI-informed clinical practice. This review aims to review current applications of AI in radiation oncology and evaluate how AI-driven tools can enhance resident education in clinical, procedural, and research domains. A narrative literature review was conducted across major databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL] using keywords including \\\"artificial intelligence,\\\" \\\"medical education,\\\" \\\"radiation oncology,\\\" and \\\"auto-contouring.\\\" Expert commentary and selected studies on educational implementation of AI were included. AI enhanced learning tools span auto-segmentation feedback systems, plan optimization simulators and clinical decision support engines. AI improves access to complex cases, supports real-time feedback, and reduces dependence on faculty availability. However, risks include overreliance, algorithmic bias, and misinterpretation of AI generated outputs. Residents must develop the skills to critically appraise AI tools, review outputs, and integrate patient-centered decision making. AI offers significant potential to transform resident education in radiation oncology. Structured curriculum integration can enhance training while preserving core clinical judgment. Faculty development and institutional support are critical to successful implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)越来越多地融入放射肿瘤学实践,从自动轮廓和治疗计划到决策支持。然而,正式的住院医师培训并没有跟上这些进步的步伐,在为人工智能知情的临床实践准备未来的放射肿瘤学家方面留下了教育差距。本文旨在回顾目前人工智能在放射肿瘤学中的应用,并评估人工智能驱动的工具如何加强临床、程序和研究领域的住院医师教育。在主要数据库[MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL]中使用包括“人工智能”,“医学教育”,“放射肿瘤学”和“自动轮廓”在内的关键词进行了叙述性文献综述。包括专家评论和人工智能教育实施的精选研究。人工智能增强的学习工具包括自动分割反馈系统、计划优化模拟器和临床决策支持引擎。人工智能改善了对复杂案例的访问,支持实时反馈,并减少了对教师可用性的依赖。然而,风险包括过度依赖、算法偏差和对人工智能生成的输出的误解。住院医生必须培养批判性地评估人工智能工具、审查输出和整合以患者为中心的决策的技能。人工智能为改变放射肿瘤学住院医师教育提供了巨大的潜力。结构化的课程整合可以在保留核心临床判断的同时加强培训。教师发展和机构支持是成功实施的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Radiation Oncology Education Through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Artificial intelligence [AI] is increasingly integrated into radiation oncology practice, from auto-contouring and treatment planning to decision support. However, formal residency training has not kept pace with these advances, leaving educational gaps in preparing future radiation oncologists for AI-informed clinical practice. This review aims to review current applications of AI in radiation oncology and evaluate how AI-driven tools can enhance resident education in clinical, procedural, and research domains. A narrative literature review was conducted across major databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL] using keywords including "artificial intelligence," "medical education," "radiation oncology," and "auto-contouring." Expert commentary and selected studies on educational implementation of AI were included. AI enhanced learning tools span auto-segmentation feedback systems, plan optimization simulators and clinical decision support engines. AI improves access to complex cases, supports real-time feedback, and reduces dependence on faculty availability. However, risks include overreliance, algorithmic bias, and misinterpretation of AI generated outputs. Residents must develop the skills to critically appraise AI tools, review outputs, and integrate patient-centered decision making. AI offers significant potential to transform resident education in radiation oncology. Structured curriculum integration can enhance training while preserving core clinical judgment. Faculty development and institutional support are critical to successful implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信