{"title":"利用人工智能加强放射肿瘤学教育:应用、局限性和未来方向综述。","authors":"Zhi Xuan Ng, Ivy Weishan Ng, Teng Hwee Tan","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence [AI] is increasingly integrated into radiation oncology practice, from auto-contouring and treatment planning to decision support. However, formal residency training has not kept pace with these advances, leaving educational gaps in preparing future radiation oncologists for AI-informed clinical practice. This review aims to review current applications of AI in radiation oncology and evaluate how AI-driven tools can enhance resident education in clinical, procedural, and research domains. A narrative literature review was conducted across major databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL] using keywords including \"artificial intelligence,\" \"medical education,\" \"radiation oncology,\" and \"auto-contouring.\" Expert commentary and selected studies on educational implementation of AI were included. AI enhanced learning tools span auto-segmentation feedback systems, plan optimization simulators and clinical decision support engines. AI improves access to complex cases, supports real-time feedback, and reduces dependence on faculty availability. However, risks include overreliance, algorithmic bias, and misinterpretation of AI generated outputs. Residents must develop the skills to critically appraise AI tools, review outputs, and integrate patient-centered decision making. AI offers significant potential to transform resident education in radiation oncology. Structured curriculum integration can enhance training while preserving core clinical judgment. Faculty development and institutional support are critical to successful implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Radiation Oncology Education Through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Xuan Ng, Ivy Weishan Ng, Teng Hwee Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence [AI] is increasingly integrated into radiation oncology practice, from auto-contouring and treatment planning to decision support. However, formal residency training has not kept pace with these advances, leaving educational gaps in preparing future radiation oncologists for AI-informed clinical practice. This review aims to review current applications of AI in radiation oncology and evaluate how AI-driven tools can enhance resident education in clinical, procedural, and research domains. A narrative literature review was conducted across major databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL] using keywords including \\\"artificial intelligence,\\\" \\\"medical education,\\\" \\\"radiation oncology,\\\" and \\\"auto-contouring.\\\" Expert commentary and selected studies on educational implementation of AI were included. AI enhanced learning tools span auto-segmentation feedback systems, plan optimization simulators and clinical decision support engines. AI improves access to complex cases, supports real-time feedback, and reduces dependence on faculty availability. However, risks include overreliance, algorithmic bias, and misinterpretation of AI generated outputs. Residents must develop the skills to critically appraise AI tools, review outputs, and integrate patient-centered decision making. AI offers significant potential to transform resident education in radiation oncology. Structured curriculum integration can enhance training while preserving core clinical judgment. Faculty development and institutional support are critical to successful implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02763-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing Radiation Oncology Education Through Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Applications, Limitations, and Future Directions.
Artificial intelligence [AI] is increasingly integrated into radiation oncology practice, from auto-contouring and treatment planning to decision support. However, formal residency training has not kept pace with these advances, leaving educational gaps in preparing future radiation oncologists for AI-informed clinical practice. This review aims to review current applications of AI in radiation oncology and evaluate how AI-driven tools can enhance resident education in clinical, procedural, and research domains. A narrative literature review was conducted across major databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL] using keywords including "artificial intelligence," "medical education," "radiation oncology," and "auto-contouring." Expert commentary and selected studies on educational implementation of AI were included. AI enhanced learning tools span auto-segmentation feedback systems, plan optimization simulators and clinical decision support engines. AI improves access to complex cases, supports real-time feedback, and reduces dependence on faculty availability. However, risks include overreliance, algorithmic bias, and misinterpretation of AI generated outputs. Residents must develop the skills to critically appraise AI tools, review outputs, and integrate patient-centered decision making. AI offers significant potential to transform resident education in radiation oncology. Structured curriculum integration can enhance training while preserving core clinical judgment. Faculty development and institutional support are critical to successful implementation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.