颈椎后路手术对颈痛相关驾驶障碍的影响及术后恶化或改善不良的危险因素分析:一项回顾性多中心队列研究

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Naoki Okamoto, Hideki Nakamoto, Hiroki Iwai, Naohiro Kawamura, Akiro Higashikawa, Nobuhiro Hara, Yujiro Takeshita, Masayoshi Fukushima, Takashi Ono, Masahito Oshina, Shima Hirai, Kazuhiro Masuda, Shurei Sugita, Sakae Tanaka, Yasushi Oshima
{"title":"颈椎后路手术对颈痛相关驾驶障碍的影响及术后恶化或改善不良的危险因素分析:一项回顾性多中心队列研究","authors":"Naoki Okamoto, Hideki Nakamoto, Hiroki Iwai, Naohiro Kawamura, Akiro Higashikawa, Nobuhiro Hara, Yujiro Takeshita, Masayoshi Fukushima, Takashi Ono, Masahito Oshina, Shima Hirai, Kazuhiro Masuda, Shurei Sugita, Sakae Tanaka, Yasushi Oshima","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.10.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Previous research has shown the positive effect of 1- and 2-level anterior cervical spine surgery on driving disability; however, the impact of posterior cervical spine surgery, which is usually performed for three or more level pathologies, remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of posterior cervical spine surgery on neck pain-related driving disability and identify the risk factors for poor driving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review of a multicenter prospective database.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Data were collected on patient and surgical characteristics and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scale for neck/arm pain, EuroQol 5 Dimension, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, and postoperative satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NDI driving subscale (0-5) was used to evaluate neck pain-related driving disability at baseline and 24 months postoperatively. Driving severity was categorized as \"non-to-mild\" (score 0, 1, or 2) and \"moderate-to-severe\" (score 3, 4, or 5) and used to determine whether patients experienced postoperative improvement, worsening, or rest. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinical and surgical risk factors for deteriorating or persistent driving disability. We analyzed the association between driving outcomes and PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1067 patients included, 277 (26.0%) reported moderate-to-severe driving disability at baseline. At 24 months, 70.8% of these patients experienced substantial improvement, whereas 29.2% did not. Among the 790 patients with baseline non-to-mild driving disability, 69 (8.7%) experienced significant postoperative deterioration. Multivariate analysis identified older age (odds ratio [OR] 2.6), female sex (OR 2.2), and ≥4-level fusion (OR 2.4) as significant risk factors for postoperative worsening, whereas older age (OR 2.1) was the significant risk factor for poor postoperative improvement. Patients with poor outcomes were less likely to achieve clinically significant improvements in all PROMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posterior cervical spine surgery can improve driving disability associated with neck pain. Nevertheless, the potential risk of postoperative deterioration or poor improvement should be considered, particularly among patients who are older, female, or have undergone ≥4-level fusion surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of posterior cervical spine surgery on neck pain-related driving disability and risk factor analysis of postoperative worsening or poor improvement: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Naoki Okamoto, Hideki Nakamoto, Hiroki Iwai, Naohiro Kawamura, Akiro Higashikawa, Nobuhiro Hara, Yujiro Takeshita, Masayoshi Fukushima, Takashi Ono, Masahito Oshina, Shima Hirai, Kazuhiro Masuda, Shurei Sugita, Sakae Tanaka, Yasushi Oshima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.10.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Previous research has shown the positive effect of 1- and 2-level anterior cervical spine surgery on driving disability; however, the impact of posterior cervical spine surgery, which is usually performed for three or more level pathologies, remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of posterior cervical spine surgery on neck pain-related driving disability and identify the risk factors for poor driving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review of a multicenter prospective database.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Data were collected on patient and surgical characteristics and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scale for neck/arm pain, EuroQol 5 Dimension, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, and postoperative satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NDI driving subscale (0-5) was used to evaluate neck pain-related driving disability at baseline and 24 months postoperatively. Driving severity was categorized as \\\"non-to-mild\\\" (score 0, 1, or 2) and \\\"moderate-to-severe\\\" (score 3, 4, or 5) and used to determine whether patients experienced postoperative improvement, worsening, or rest. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinical and surgical risk factors for deteriorating or persistent driving disability. We analyzed the association between driving outcomes and PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1067 patients included, 277 (26.0%) reported moderate-to-severe driving disability at baseline. At 24 months, 70.8% of these patients experienced substantial improvement, whereas 29.2% did not. Among the 790 patients with baseline non-to-mild driving disability, 69 (8.7%) experienced significant postoperative deterioration. Multivariate analysis identified older age (odds ratio [OR] 2.6), female sex (OR 2.2), and ≥4-level fusion (OR 2.4) as significant risk factors for postoperative worsening, whereas older age (OR 2.1) was the significant risk factor for poor postoperative improvement. Patients with poor outcomes were less likely to achieve clinically significant improvements in all PROMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posterior cervical spine surgery can improve driving disability associated with neck pain. Nevertheless, the potential risk of postoperative deterioration or poor improvement should be considered, particularly among patients who are older, female, or have undergone ≥4-level fusion surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.10.025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.10.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景背景:既往研究表明1节段和2节段颈椎前路手术对驾驶障碍有积极影响;然而,后路颈椎手术的影响,通常是三节段或更多的病理,仍未被探索。目的:探讨颈椎后路手术对颈痛相关驾驶障碍的影响,并找出导致驾驶效果不佳的危险因素。研究设计:对多中心前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。患者样本:因退行性颈椎病接受后路颈椎手术的患者。结果测量:收集患者和手术特征以及患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)的数据,包括颈部残疾指数(NDI)、颈部/手臂疼痛数值评定量表、EuroQol 5维度、日本骨科协会评分和术后满意度。方法:采用NDI驾驶量表(0-5)对患者基线及术后24个月颈部疼痛相关驾驶能力进行评估。驾驶严重程度分为“非至轻度”(评分0、1或2)和“中度至重度”(评分3、4或5),并用于确定患者是否经历了术后改善、恶化或休息。进行多变量分析以确定恶化或持续驾驶障碍的临床和手术危险因素。我们分析了驾驶结果与prom之间的关系。结果:在纳入的1067例患者中,277例(26.0%)在基线时报告了中度至重度驾驶障碍。在24个月时,70.8%的患者有明显的改善,而29.2%没有。在790例基线非至轻度驾驶障碍患者中,69例(8.7%)出现明显的术后恶化。多因素分析发现,年龄较大(比值比[OR] 2.6)、女性(比值比[OR] 2.2)和≥4节段融合(OR 2.4)是术后恶化的重要危险因素,而年龄较大(比值比[OR] 2.1)是术后改善不良的重要危险因素。预后差的患者不太可能在所有PROMs中获得临床显着改善。结论:颈椎后路手术可改善颈痛所致驾驶障碍。然而,应考虑术后恶化或改善不佳的潜在风险,特别是在年龄较大、女性或接受≥4节段融合手术的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of posterior cervical spine surgery on neck pain-related driving disability and risk factor analysis of postoperative worsening or poor improvement: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Background context: Previous research has shown the positive effect of 1- and 2-level anterior cervical spine surgery on driving disability; however, the impact of posterior cervical spine surgery, which is usually performed for three or more level pathologies, remains unexplored.

Purpose: To investigate the impact of posterior cervical spine surgery on neck pain-related driving disability and identify the risk factors for poor driving outcomes.

Study design: A retrospective review of a multicenter prospective database.

Patient sample: Patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Outcome measures: Data were collected on patient and surgical characteristics and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scale for neck/arm pain, EuroQol 5 Dimension, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, and postoperative satisfaction.

Methods: The NDI driving subscale (0-5) was used to evaluate neck pain-related driving disability at baseline and 24 months postoperatively. Driving severity was categorized as "non-to-mild" (score 0, 1, or 2) and "moderate-to-severe" (score 3, 4, or 5) and used to determine whether patients experienced postoperative improvement, worsening, or rest. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinical and surgical risk factors for deteriorating or persistent driving disability. We analyzed the association between driving outcomes and PROMs.

Results: Of the 1067 patients included, 277 (26.0%) reported moderate-to-severe driving disability at baseline. At 24 months, 70.8% of these patients experienced substantial improvement, whereas 29.2% did not. Among the 790 patients with baseline non-to-mild driving disability, 69 (8.7%) experienced significant postoperative deterioration. Multivariate analysis identified older age (odds ratio [OR] 2.6), female sex (OR 2.2), and ≥4-level fusion (OR 2.4) as significant risk factors for postoperative worsening, whereas older age (OR 2.1) was the significant risk factor for poor postoperative improvement. Patients with poor outcomes were less likely to achieve clinically significant improvements in all PROMs.

Conclusions: Posterior cervical spine surgery can improve driving disability associated with neck pain. Nevertheless, the potential risk of postoperative deterioration or poor improvement should be considered, particularly among patients who are older, female, or have undergone ≥4-level fusion surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信