生物信息学在临床实践中的建议。

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ksenia Lavrichenko, Emilie Sofie Engdal, Rasmus L Marvig, Anders Jemt, Jone Marius Vignes, Henrikki Almusa, Kristine Bilgrav Saether, Eiríkur Briem, Eva Caceres, Edda María Elvarsdóttir, Magnús Halldór Gíslason, Maria K Haanpää, Viktor Henmyr, Ronja Hotakainen, Eevi Kaasinen, Roan Kanninga, Sofia Khan, Mary Gertrude Lie-Nielsen, Majbritt Busk Madsen, Niklas Mähler, Khurram Maqbool, Ramprasad Neethiraj, Karl Nyrén, Minna Paavola, Peter Pruisscher, Ying Sheng, Ashish Kumar Singh, Aashish Srivastava, Thomas K Stautland, Daniel T Andreasen, Esmee Ten Berk de Boer, Søren Vang, Valtteri Wirta, Frederik Otzen Bagger
{"title":"生物信息学在临床实践中的建议。","authors":"Ksenia Lavrichenko, Emilie Sofie Engdal, Rasmus L Marvig, Anders Jemt, Jone Marius Vignes, Henrikki Almusa, Kristine Bilgrav Saether, Eiríkur Briem, Eva Caceres, Edda María Elvarsdóttir, Magnús Halldór Gíslason, Maria K Haanpää, Viktor Henmyr, Ronja Hotakainen, Eevi Kaasinen, Roan Kanninga, Sofia Khan, Mary Gertrude Lie-Nielsen, Majbritt Busk Madsen, Niklas Mähler, Khurram Maqbool, Ramprasad Neethiraj, Karl Nyrén, Minna Paavola, Peter Pruisscher, Ying Sheng, Ashish Kumar Singh, Aashish Srivastava, Thomas K Stautland, Daniel T Andreasen, Esmee Ten Berk de Boer, Søren Vang, Valtteri Wirta, Frederik Otzen Bagger","doi":"10.1186/s13073-025-01543-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is well established in clinical diagnostics, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly becoming the method of choice, as a result of lower prices and robust comprehensive data. While guidelines exist for variant interpretation and laboratory quality considerations, there remains a need for standardised bioinformatics practices to ensure clinical consensus, accuracy, reproducibility and comparability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article presents consensus recommendations developed by 13 clinical bioinformatics units participating in the Nordic Alliance for Clinical Genomics (NACG) by expert bioinformaticians working in clinical production. The recommendations are based on clinical practice and focus on analysis types, test and validation, standardisation and accreditation, as well as core competencies and technical management required for clinical bioinformatics operations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key recommendations include adopting the hg38 genome build as reference, and a standard set of recommended analyses, including the use of multiple tools for structural variant (SV) calling and in-house data sets for filtering recurrent calls. Clinical bioinformatics in production should operate at standards similar to ISO 15189, utilising off-grid clinical-grade high-performance computing systems, standardised file formats and strict version control. Reproducibility should be ensured through containerised software environments. Pipelines must be documented and tested for accuracy and reproducibility, minimally covering unit, integration and end-to-end testing. Standard truth sets such as GIAB and SEQC2 for germline and somatic variant calling, respectively, should be supplemented by recall testing of real human samples that have been previously tested using a validated method. Data integrity must be verified using file hashing, while sample identity must be confirmed through fingerprinting and genetically inferred identification markers such as sex and relatedness. Finally, clinical bioinformatics should encompass diverse skills, including software development, data management, quality assurance and domain expertise in human genetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These recommendations provide a consensus framework for standardising bioinformatics practices across clinical WGS applications and can serve as a practical guide to facilities that are new to large-scale sequencing-based diagnostics, or as a reference for those who already run high-volume clinical production using NGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for bioinformatics in clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Ksenia Lavrichenko, Emilie Sofie Engdal, Rasmus L Marvig, Anders Jemt, Jone Marius Vignes, Henrikki Almusa, Kristine Bilgrav Saether, Eiríkur Briem, Eva Caceres, Edda María Elvarsdóttir, Magnús Halldór Gíslason, Maria K Haanpää, Viktor Henmyr, Ronja Hotakainen, Eevi Kaasinen, Roan Kanninga, Sofia Khan, Mary Gertrude Lie-Nielsen, Majbritt Busk Madsen, Niklas Mähler, Khurram Maqbool, Ramprasad Neethiraj, Karl Nyrén, Minna Paavola, Peter Pruisscher, Ying Sheng, Ashish Kumar Singh, Aashish Srivastava, Thomas K Stautland, Daniel T Andreasen, Esmee Ten Berk de Boer, Søren Vang, Valtteri Wirta, Frederik Otzen Bagger\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13073-025-01543-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is well established in clinical diagnostics, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly becoming the method of choice, as a result of lower prices and robust comprehensive data. While guidelines exist for variant interpretation and laboratory quality considerations, there remains a need for standardised bioinformatics practices to ensure clinical consensus, accuracy, reproducibility and comparability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article presents consensus recommendations developed by 13 clinical bioinformatics units participating in the Nordic Alliance for Clinical Genomics (NACG) by expert bioinformaticians working in clinical production. The recommendations are based on clinical practice and focus on analysis types, test and validation, standardisation and accreditation, as well as core competencies and technical management required for clinical bioinformatics operations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key recommendations include adopting the hg38 genome build as reference, and a standard set of recommended analyses, including the use of multiple tools for structural variant (SV) calling and in-house data sets for filtering recurrent calls. Clinical bioinformatics in production should operate at standards similar to ISO 15189, utilising off-grid clinical-grade high-performance computing systems, standardised file formats and strict version control. Reproducibility should be ensured through containerised software environments. Pipelines must be documented and tested for accuracy and reproducibility, minimally covering unit, integration and end-to-end testing. Standard truth sets such as GIAB and SEQC2 for germline and somatic variant calling, respectively, should be supplemented by recall testing of real human samples that have been previously tested using a validated method. Data integrity must be verified using file hashing, while sample identity must be confirmed through fingerprinting and genetically inferred identification markers such as sex and relatedness. Finally, clinical bioinformatics should encompass diverse skills, including software development, data management, quality assurance and domain expertise in human genetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These recommendations provide a consensus framework for standardising bioinformatics practices across clinical WGS applications and can serve as a practical guide to facilities that are new to large-scale sequencing-based diagnostics, or as a reference for those who already run high-volume clinical production using NGS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01543-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01543-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下一代测序(NGS)在临床诊断中已经得到了很好的应用,而全基因组测序(WGS)正日益成为首选方法,因为其价格更低,数据更全面。虽然存在关于变异解释和实验室质量考虑的指南,但仍然需要标准化的生物信息学实践,以确保临床共识、准确性、可重复性和可比性。方法:本文提出了由参与北欧临床基因组学联盟(NACG)的13个临床生物信息学单位由从事临床生产的生物信息学专家提出的共识建议。这些建议以临床实践为基础,重点是分析类型、测试和验证、标准化和认证,以及临床生物信息学操作所需的核心能力和技术管理。结果:主要建议包括采用hg38基因组构建作为参考,以及一套标准的推荐分析,包括使用多种工具进行结构变异(SV)呼叫和内部数据集过滤重复呼叫。生产中的临床生物信息学应按照类似于ISO 15189的标准运行,利用离网临床级高性能计算系统、标准化文件格式和严格的版本控制。应通过容器化的软件环境确保再现性。必须记录和测试管道的准确性和可重复性,最低限度地覆盖单元、集成和端到端测试。标准真值集,如GIAB和SEQC2分别用于种系和体细胞变异召唤,应该通过对真实人类样本的召回测试来补充,这些样本之前已经使用经过验证的方法进行了测试。数据完整性必须使用文件哈希来验证,而样本身份必须通过指纹和基因推断的识别标记(如性别和亲缘关系)来确认。最后,临床生物信息学应该包含多种技能,包括软件开发、数据管理、质量保证和人类遗传学领域的专业知识。结论:这些建议为跨临床WGS应用的生物信息学实践标准化提供了一个共识框架,可以作为大规模基于测序的诊断新设施的实用指南,或作为那些已经使用NGS进行大批量临床生产的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Recommendations for bioinformatics in clinical practice.

Recommendations for bioinformatics in clinical practice.

Recommendations for bioinformatics in clinical practice.

Recommendations for bioinformatics in clinical practice.

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is well established in clinical diagnostics, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly becoming the method of choice, as a result of lower prices and robust comprehensive data. While guidelines exist for variant interpretation and laboratory quality considerations, there remains a need for standardised bioinformatics practices to ensure clinical consensus, accuracy, reproducibility and comparability.

Methods: This article presents consensus recommendations developed by 13 clinical bioinformatics units participating in the Nordic Alliance for Clinical Genomics (NACG) by expert bioinformaticians working in clinical production. The recommendations are based on clinical practice and focus on analysis types, test and validation, standardisation and accreditation, as well as core competencies and technical management required for clinical bioinformatics operations.

Results: Key recommendations include adopting the hg38 genome build as reference, and a standard set of recommended analyses, including the use of multiple tools for structural variant (SV) calling and in-house data sets for filtering recurrent calls. Clinical bioinformatics in production should operate at standards similar to ISO 15189, utilising off-grid clinical-grade high-performance computing systems, standardised file formats and strict version control. Reproducibility should be ensured through containerised software environments. Pipelines must be documented and tested for accuracy and reproducibility, minimally covering unit, integration and end-to-end testing. Standard truth sets such as GIAB and SEQC2 for germline and somatic variant calling, respectively, should be supplemented by recall testing of real human samples that have been previously tested using a validated method. Data integrity must be verified using file hashing, while sample identity must be confirmed through fingerprinting and genetically inferred identification markers such as sex and relatedness. Finally, clinical bioinformatics should encompass diverse skills, including software development, data management, quality assurance and domain expertise in human genetics.

Conclusions: These recommendations provide a consensus framework for standardising bioinformatics practices across clinical WGS applications and can serve as a practical guide to facilities that are new to large-scale sequencing-based diagnostics, or as a reference for those who already run high-volume clinical production using NGS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信