比较利用遥感和气候数据集估算牧草可用性的参数和非参数方法。

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sajad Alimahmoodi Sarab, Farajollah Tarnian, Ebrahim Karimi Sangchini, Mahmood Najafi Zilaie
{"title":"比较利用遥感和气候数据集估算牧草可用性的参数和非参数方法。","authors":"Sajad Alimahmoodi Sarab,&nbsp;Farajollah Tarnian,&nbsp;Ebrahim Karimi Sangchini,&nbsp;Mahmood Najafi Zilaie","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14679-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate estimation of forage availability is crucial for effective rangeland management. This study, conducted in a hot semi-arid rangeland (844.7 ha) in Khuzestan province, Iran, outlines a three-step approach to achieve this goal. Forage availability was measured using the cutting and weighing method on 58 one-square-meter sample plots. Initially, remote sensing (Sentinel-2) and climatic indicators were prepared, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to analyze relationships between these independent variables and the dependent variable (forage mass). The second step focused on identifying optimal vegetation indices for forage availability estimation using multiple linear regression (MLR), Random Forest (RF), and classification and regression trees (C&amp;RT) algorithms. The third step aimed to enhance model performance by integrating vegetation and climatic indices. Using 58 sample plots, 30 were used for modeling and 28 exclusively for final validation. A k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) was employed, with 47 plots for training and 11 for validation in each iteration. Model performance (MLR, RF, C&amp;RT) was evaluated using average R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE metrics from all validation folds, ensuring robust and reliable results. The Random Forest used an internal 60–20-20 split. Correlation analysis revealed that MSAVI2 (-0.83), SAVI (-0.23), DVI (-0.17), potential evapotranspiration index (-0.42), and Transou index (0.35) were the most significant variables. In the second step, R<sup>2</sup> values for MLR, RF, and C&amp;RT models were 0.54, 0.54, and 0.68, respectively. Incorporating potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices into the models boosted their coefficients of determination to 0.68, 0.72, and 0.91, with corresponding RMSE reductions of 85%, 69%, and 22%. The study concludes that a combination of the MSAVI2 index with potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices, implemented through the non-parametric C&amp;RT regression, offers a robust method for estimating rangeland forage availability in hot, semi-arid, and arid environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating forage availability using remote sensing and climatic datasets\",\"authors\":\"Sajad Alimahmoodi Sarab,&nbsp;Farajollah Tarnian,&nbsp;Ebrahim Karimi Sangchini,&nbsp;Mahmood Najafi Zilaie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-025-14679-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accurate estimation of forage availability is crucial for effective rangeland management. This study, conducted in a hot semi-arid rangeland (844.7 ha) in Khuzestan province, Iran, outlines a three-step approach to achieve this goal. Forage availability was measured using the cutting and weighing method on 58 one-square-meter sample plots. Initially, remote sensing (Sentinel-2) and climatic indicators were prepared, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to analyze relationships between these independent variables and the dependent variable (forage mass). The second step focused on identifying optimal vegetation indices for forage availability estimation using multiple linear regression (MLR), Random Forest (RF), and classification and regression trees (C&amp;RT) algorithms. The third step aimed to enhance model performance by integrating vegetation and climatic indices. Using 58 sample plots, 30 were used for modeling and 28 exclusively for final validation. A k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) was employed, with 47 plots for training and 11 for validation in each iteration. Model performance (MLR, RF, C&amp;RT) was evaluated using average R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE metrics from all validation folds, ensuring robust and reliable results. The Random Forest used an internal 60–20-20 split. Correlation analysis revealed that MSAVI2 (-0.83), SAVI (-0.23), DVI (-0.17), potential evapotranspiration index (-0.42), and Transou index (0.35) were the most significant variables. In the second step, R<sup>2</sup> values for MLR, RF, and C&amp;RT models were 0.54, 0.54, and 0.68, respectively. Incorporating potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices into the models boosted their coefficients of determination to 0.68, 0.72, and 0.91, with corresponding RMSE reductions of 85%, 69%, and 22%. The study concludes that a combination of the MSAVI2 index with potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices, implemented through the non-parametric C&amp;RT regression, offers a robust method for estimating rangeland forage availability in hot, semi-arid, and arid environments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14679-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14679-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牧草可利用性的准确估计对有效的牧场管理至关重要。这项研究在伊朗Khuzestan省一个炎热的半干旱牧场(844.7公顷)进行,概述了实现这一目标的三步走方法。采用刈割称重法对58个1平方米样地的牧草有效性进行了测定。首先准备遥感(Sentinel-2)和气候指标,利用Pearson相关系数分析这些自变量与因变量(牧草质量)之间的关系。第二步重点是利用多元线性回归(MLR)、随机森林(RF)和分类回归树(C&RT)算法确定牧草可用性估计的最佳植被指数。第三步旨在通过整合植被和气候指数来提高模型的性能。使用58个样本图,30个用于建模,28个专门用于最终验证。采用k-fold交叉验证(k = 5),每次迭代有47个地块用于训练,11个地块用于验证。使用来自所有验证折叠的平均R2和RMSE指标评估模型性能(MLR, RF, C&RT),确保结果稳健可靠。随机森林使用内部60-20-20分割。相关性分析显示,MSAVI2(-0.83)、SAVI(-0.23)、DVI(-0.17)、潜在蒸散指数(-0.42)和Transou指数(0.35)是最显著的变量。第二步,MLR、RF和C&RT模型的R2值分别为0.54、0.54和0.68。将潜在蒸散发和Transou指数纳入模型后,其确定系数分别提高到0.68、0.72和0.91,相应的RMSE降低了85%、69%和22%。研究表明,MSAVI2指数与潜在蒸散量和Transou指数结合,通过非参数C&RT回归实现,为估算炎热、半干旱和干旱环境下草地牧草有效性提供了一种稳健的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating forage availability using remote sensing and climatic datasets

Comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating forage availability using remote sensing and climatic datasets

Accurate estimation of forage availability is crucial for effective rangeland management. This study, conducted in a hot semi-arid rangeland (844.7 ha) in Khuzestan province, Iran, outlines a three-step approach to achieve this goal. Forage availability was measured using the cutting and weighing method on 58 one-square-meter sample plots. Initially, remote sensing (Sentinel-2) and climatic indicators were prepared, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to analyze relationships between these independent variables and the dependent variable (forage mass). The second step focused on identifying optimal vegetation indices for forage availability estimation using multiple linear regression (MLR), Random Forest (RF), and classification and regression trees (C&RT) algorithms. The third step aimed to enhance model performance by integrating vegetation and climatic indices. Using 58 sample plots, 30 were used for modeling and 28 exclusively for final validation. A k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) was employed, with 47 plots for training and 11 for validation in each iteration. Model performance (MLR, RF, C&RT) was evaluated using average R2 and RMSE metrics from all validation folds, ensuring robust and reliable results. The Random Forest used an internal 60–20-20 split. Correlation analysis revealed that MSAVI2 (-0.83), SAVI (-0.23), DVI (-0.17), potential evapotranspiration index (-0.42), and Transou index (0.35) were the most significant variables. In the second step, R2 values for MLR, RF, and C&RT models were 0.54, 0.54, and 0.68, respectively. Incorporating potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices into the models boosted their coefficients of determination to 0.68, 0.72, and 0.91, with corresponding RMSE reductions of 85%, 69%, and 22%. The study concludes that a combination of the MSAVI2 index with potential evapotranspiration and Transou indices, implemented through the non-parametric C&RT regression, offers a robust method for estimating rangeland forage availability in hot, semi-arid, and arid environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信