重症监护病房耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的结局及不同抗菌方案的预后影响。

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chieh-Lung Chen, Kuang-Yao Yang, Chung-Kan Peng, Ming-Cheng Chan, Chau-Chyun Sheu, Jia-Yih Feng, Sheng-Huei Wang, Wei-Hsuan Huang, Chia-Min Chen, How-Yang Tseng, Yu-Chao Lin
{"title":"重症监护病房耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的结局及不同抗菌方案的预后影响。","authors":"Chieh-Lung Chen, Kuang-Yao Yang, Chung-Kan Peng, Ming-Cheng Chan, Chau-Chyun Sheu, Jia-Yih Feng, Sheng-Huei Wang, Wei-Hsuan Huang, Chia-Min Chen, How-Yang Tseng, Yu-Chao Lin","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01580-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) poses a significant global threat due to limited therapeutic options and high rates of associated mortality. CRAB-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) represent a major clinical challenge. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of CRAB-BSIs in ICU settings and evaluate the prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted at five medical centers in Taiwan and included 393 critically ill patients with CRAB-BSIs between January 2015 and December 2019. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for day-28 mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common causes of CRAB-BSIs were pneumonia (42.5%) and catheter-related infections (38.7%). The day-28 mortality rate following BSI onset was 56.5%. A higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score independently predicted increased day-28 mortality. Colistin-based therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes in the original (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.56; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.35-0.88) and time-window bias-adjusted (aHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94) cohorts. Among patients with pneumonia-related CRAB-BSIs, colistin-based therapy did not significantly improve day-28 survival, whereas sulbactam-based therapy showed survival benefit (aHR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91). Neither carbapenem-based nor tigecycline-based therapies demonstrated a mortality benefit on day 28.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRAB-BSIs are associated with high mortality in critically ill patients. In settings where novel antibiotics are not available, colistin-based therapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Among patients with pneumonia-related CRAB-BSIs, sulbactam-based therapy was associated with lower mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"162"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12534662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in intensive care units and prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.\",\"authors\":\"Chieh-Lung Chen, Kuang-Yao Yang, Chung-Kan Peng, Ming-Cheng Chan, Chau-Chyun Sheu, Jia-Yih Feng, Sheng-Huei Wang, Wei-Hsuan Huang, Chia-Min Chen, How-Yang Tseng, Yu-Chao Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13613-025-01580-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) poses a significant global threat due to limited therapeutic options and high rates of associated mortality. CRAB-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) represent a major clinical challenge. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of CRAB-BSIs in ICU settings and evaluate the prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted at five medical centers in Taiwan and included 393 critically ill patients with CRAB-BSIs between January 2015 and December 2019. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for day-28 mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common causes of CRAB-BSIs were pneumonia (42.5%) and catheter-related infections (38.7%). The day-28 mortality rate following BSI onset was 56.5%. A higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score independently predicted increased day-28 mortality. Colistin-based therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes in the original (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.56; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.35-0.88) and time-window bias-adjusted (aHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94) cohorts. Among patients with pneumonia-related CRAB-BSIs, colistin-based therapy did not significantly improve day-28 survival, whereas sulbactam-based therapy showed survival benefit (aHR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91). Neither carbapenem-based nor tigecycline-based therapies demonstrated a mortality benefit on day 28.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRAB-BSIs are associated with high mortality in critically ill patients. In settings where novel antibiotics are not available, colistin-based therapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Among patients with pneumonia-related CRAB-BSIs, sulbactam-based therapy was associated with lower mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12534662/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01580-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01580-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)由于治疗选择有限和相关死亡率高,构成了重大的全球威胁。重症监护病房(icu)中螃蟹相关血流感染(bsi)是一项重大的临床挑战。本研究旨在探讨螃蟹- bsi在ICU环境下的临床结果,并评估不同抗菌方案的预后效果。方法:本研究是一项多中心、回顾性观察性研究,于2015年1月至2019年12月在台湾5个医疗中心进行,纳入393例螃蟹- bsi危重患者。分析临床和微生物学结果。采用多变量回归分析确定28天死亡率的独立预后因素。结果:crb - bsi最常见的病因是肺炎(42.5%)和导管相关感染(38.7%)。BSI发病后第28天死亡率为56.5%。较高的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分独立预测28天死亡率增加。在原始队列(校正风险比[aHR], 0.56; 95%可信区间(CI), 0.35-0.88)和时间窗偏差校正(aHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94)中,以粘菌素为基础的治疗与改善的生存结果相关。在肺炎相关的螃蟹- bsi患者中,以粘菌素为基础的治疗并没有显著提高第28天的生存率,而以舒巴坦为基础的治疗显示出生存获益(aHR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91)。以碳青霉烯为基础的治疗和以替加环素为基础的治疗在第28天均未显示死亡率降低。结论:螃蟹性脑损伤与危重患者的高死亡率相关。在没有新型抗生素的环境中,以粘菌素为基础的治疗与改善临床结果相关。在肺炎相关的CRAB-BSIs患者中,以舒巴坦为基础的治疗与较低的死亡率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in intensive care units and prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.

Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in intensive care units and prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.

Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in intensive care units and prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) poses a significant global threat due to limited therapeutic options and high rates of associated mortality. CRAB-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) represent a major clinical challenge. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of CRAB-BSIs in ICU settings and evaluate the prognostic effect of different antimicrobial regimens.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted at five medical centers in Taiwan and included 393 critically ill patients with CRAB-BSIs between January 2015 and December 2019. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for day-28 mortality.

Results: The most common causes of CRAB-BSIs were pneumonia (42.5%) and catheter-related infections (38.7%). The day-28 mortality rate following BSI onset was 56.5%. A higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score independently predicted increased day-28 mortality. Colistin-based therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes in the original (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.56; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.35-0.88) and time-window bias-adjusted (aHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94) cohorts. Among patients with pneumonia-related CRAB-BSIs, colistin-based therapy did not significantly improve day-28 survival, whereas sulbactam-based therapy showed survival benefit (aHR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91). Neither carbapenem-based nor tigecycline-based therapies demonstrated a mortality benefit on day 28.

Conclusion: CRAB-BSIs are associated with high mortality in critically ill patients. In settings where novel antibiotics are not available, colistin-based therapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Among patients with pneumonia-related CRAB-BSIs, sulbactam-based therapy was associated with lower mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信