胸外按压时动脉多普勒超声血流波形检测动脉线搏动。

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel M Rolston,Nicholas Bielawa,Xueqi Huang,Alexander V Nello,Ghania Haddad,Daniel Jafari,Timmy Li,Lance B Becker,Allison L Cohen
{"title":"胸外按压时动脉多普勒超声血流波形检测动脉线搏动。","authors":"Daniel M Rolston,Nicholas Bielawa,Xueqi Huang,Alexander V Nello,Ghania Haddad,Daniel Jafari,Timmy Li,Lance B Becker,Allison L Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVE\r\nDoppler ultrasound blood flow waveforms during active chest compressions are unique and may allow identification of return of spontaneous circulation. We assessed diagnostic accuracy of 4 identified Doppler ultrasound blood flow waveforms-(1) bidirectional blood flow, (2) minimal blood flow, (3) anterograde dominant blood flow, and (4) pulsatility through compressions-during chest compressions to detect arterial line (a-line) pulsatility during a subsequent pulse check. Secondarily, we assessed if pulsatility through compressions was associated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) at pulse check than anterograde dominant blood flow.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study on a prospectively collected convenience sample of adult, emergency department cardiac arrest patients. All patients had a femoral a-line. Prior to a pulse check, Doppler ultrasound clips of the femoral artery were saved and reviewed. During a pulse check, the presence or absence of an arterial line waveform and the highest SBP were recorded. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the blood flow waveforms were calculated using generalized estimating equation models.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nForty-four patients with 123 Doppler ultrasound waveforms and subsequent pulse checks were analyzed. Accuracy of the Doppler ultrasound waveforms was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.3 to 93.7), sensitivity of pulsatility through compressions or anterograde dominant blood flow to detect a-line pulsatility was 97.7% (95% CI 87.7 to 99.6), and specificity of bidirectional blood flow or minimal blood flow for the absence of a-line pulsatility was 81.5% (95% CI 69.3 to 89.6). Estimated least-squares mean SBP was higher (50.9 mmHg [95% CI 25.6 to 76.1 mmHg]) for pulsatility through compressions than anterograde dominant blood flow waveforms.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nArterial Doppler ultrasound waveforms during chest compressions had good diagnostic test characteristics for detecting arterial line pulsatility at subsequent pulse check.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arterial Doppler Ultrasound Blood Flow Waveforms During Chest Compressions to Detect Arterial Line Pulsatility.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M Rolston,Nicholas Bielawa,Xueqi Huang,Alexander V Nello,Ghania Haddad,Daniel Jafari,Timmy Li,Lance B Becker,Allison L Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STUDY OBJECTIVE\\r\\nDoppler ultrasound blood flow waveforms during active chest compressions are unique and may allow identification of return of spontaneous circulation. We assessed diagnostic accuracy of 4 identified Doppler ultrasound blood flow waveforms-(1) bidirectional blood flow, (2) minimal blood flow, (3) anterograde dominant blood flow, and (4) pulsatility through compressions-during chest compressions to detect arterial line (a-line) pulsatility during a subsequent pulse check. Secondarily, we assessed if pulsatility through compressions was associated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) at pulse check than anterograde dominant blood flow.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study on a prospectively collected convenience sample of adult, emergency department cardiac arrest patients. All patients had a femoral a-line. Prior to a pulse check, Doppler ultrasound clips of the femoral artery were saved and reviewed. During a pulse check, the presence or absence of an arterial line waveform and the highest SBP were recorded. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the blood flow waveforms were calculated using generalized estimating equation models.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nForty-four patients with 123 Doppler ultrasound waveforms and subsequent pulse checks were analyzed. Accuracy of the Doppler ultrasound waveforms was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.3 to 93.7), sensitivity of pulsatility through compressions or anterograde dominant blood flow to detect a-line pulsatility was 97.7% (95% CI 87.7 to 99.6), and specificity of bidirectional blood flow or minimal blood flow for the absence of a-line pulsatility was 81.5% (95% CI 69.3 to 89.6). Estimated least-squares mean SBP was higher (50.9 mmHg [95% CI 25.6 to 76.1 mmHg]) for pulsatility through compressions than anterograde dominant blood flow waveforms.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nArterial Doppler ultrasound waveforms during chest compressions had good diagnostic test characteristics for detecting arterial line pulsatility at subsequent pulse check.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.018\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的主动胸外按压时的多普勒超声血流波形是独特的,可用于识别自发循环的恢复。我们评估了4种已识别的多普勒超声血流波形的诊断准确性——(1)双向血流,(2)最小血流,(3)顺行优势血流,以及(4)通过按压的脉搏——在随后的脉搏检查中,在胸部按压期间检测动脉线(a线)脉搏。其次,我们评估了搏动性是否与脉搏检查时收缩压(SBP)高于顺行优势血流相关。方法对前瞻性收集的急诊科成人心脏骤停患者进行回顾性、诊断准确性研究。所有患者均有股a线。在脉搏检查之前,保存并检查股动脉的多普勒超声夹。在脉搏检查期间,记录动脉线波形的存在或不存在以及最高收缩压。使用广义估计方程模型计算血流波形的准确性、灵敏度和特异性。结果对44例患者的123个多普勒超声波形及脉搏检查进行了分析。多普勒超声波形的准确性为88.9%(95%可信区间[CI] 81.3 ~ 93.7),通过压迫或顺行优势血流检测a线脉搏的敏感性为97.7% (95% CI 87.7 ~ 99.6),双向血流或最小血流量检测a线脉搏的特异性为81.5% (95% CI 69.3 ~ 89.6)。与顺行优势血流波形相比,经压迫的搏动性估计最小二乘平均收缩压(50.9 mmHg [95% CI 25.6至76.1 mmHg])更高。结论胸外按压时动脉多普勒超声波形对后续脉搏检查中检测动脉线脉性具有良好的诊断试验特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arterial Doppler Ultrasound Blood Flow Waveforms During Chest Compressions to Detect Arterial Line Pulsatility.
STUDY OBJECTIVE Doppler ultrasound blood flow waveforms during active chest compressions are unique and may allow identification of return of spontaneous circulation. We assessed diagnostic accuracy of 4 identified Doppler ultrasound blood flow waveforms-(1) bidirectional blood flow, (2) minimal blood flow, (3) anterograde dominant blood flow, and (4) pulsatility through compressions-during chest compressions to detect arterial line (a-line) pulsatility during a subsequent pulse check. Secondarily, we assessed if pulsatility through compressions was associated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) at pulse check than anterograde dominant blood flow. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study on a prospectively collected convenience sample of adult, emergency department cardiac arrest patients. All patients had a femoral a-line. Prior to a pulse check, Doppler ultrasound clips of the femoral artery were saved and reviewed. During a pulse check, the presence or absence of an arterial line waveform and the highest SBP were recorded. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the blood flow waveforms were calculated using generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS Forty-four patients with 123 Doppler ultrasound waveforms and subsequent pulse checks were analyzed. Accuracy of the Doppler ultrasound waveforms was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.3 to 93.7), sensitivity of pulsatility through compressions or anterograde dominant blood flow to detect a-line pulsatility was 97.7% (95% CI 87.7 to 99.6), and specificity of bidirectional blood flow or minimal blood flow for the absence of a-line pulsatility was 81.5% (95% CI 69.3 to 89.6). Estimated least-squares mean SBP was higher (50.9 mmHg [95% CI 25.6 to 76.1 mmHg]) for pulsatility through compressions than anterograde dominant blood flow waveforms. CONCLUSION Arterial Doppler ultrasound waveforms during chest compressions had good diagnostic test characteristics for detecting arterial line pulsatility at subsequent pulse check.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信