增强自主素养:学前教育课堂倡导与行动主义的个案研究

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Victoria Damjanovic, Stephanie Branson
{"title":"增强自主素养:学前教育课堂倡导与行动主义的个案研究","authors":"Victoria Damjanovic, Stephanie Branson","doi":"10.1177/14687984251388516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental right of every child to access books and materials with diverse perspectives is recognized globally. This right not only supports cognitive and academic development but also contributes significantly to social and emotional well-being, fostering active participation in society. However, integrating social justice topics into early childhood education remains a challenge. This article argues that failing to address these topics not only marginalizes children but also perpetuates a deficit perspective. This study explores how an inquiry-based environment empowers agentic literacies. We used a case study approach to examine children’s literacy practices and their engagement with social justice concepts. Data sources include teacher-created storyboards with children’s work samples and dialog, transcripts from planning meetings, and a researcher journal. Data were analyzed using line-by-line coding for transcripts, storyboard dialog, and the researcher’s journal. Visual analysis was used to investigate children’s work samples. The findings illustrate a progression from agentic learners to advocates and eventually activists, with children actively participating in decision-making processes throughout. Two vignettes offer narrative snapshots of the project, demonstrating children’s agentic literacy practices and how children’s wonderings drove discussions and actions around social justice issues in a contextualized meaningful way.","PeriodicalId":47033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering agentic literacies: A case study on advocacy and activism in a preschool classroom\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Damjanovic, Stephanie Branson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14687984251388516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fundamental right of every child to access books and materials with diverse perspectives is recognized globally. This right not only supports cognitive and academic development but also contributes significantly to social and emotional well-being, fostering active participation in society. However, integrating social justice topics into early childhood education remains a challenge. This article argues that failing to address these topics not only marginalizes children but also perpetuates a deficit perspective. This study explores how an inquiry-based environment empowers agentic literacies. We used a case study approach to examine children’s literacy practices and their engagement with social justice concepts. Data sources include teacher-created storyboards with children’s work samples and dialog, transcripts from planning meetings, and a researcher journal. Data were analyzed using line-by-line coding for transcripts, storyboard dialog, and the researcher’s journal. Visual analysis was used to investigate children’s work samples. The findings illustrate a progression from agentic learners to advocates and eventually activists, with children actively participating in decision-making processes throughout. Two vignettes offer narrative snapshots of the project, demonstrating children’s agentic literacy practices and how children’s wonderings drove discussions and actions around social justice issues in a contextualized meaningful way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984251388516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984251388516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每个儿童都有获得具有不同观点的书籍和资料的基本权利,这在全球得到了承认。这种权利不仅支持认知和学术发展,而且对社会和情感健康做出重大贡献,促进积极参与社会。然而,将社会正义主题纳入幼儿教育仍然是一项挑战。本文认为,未能解决这些问题不仅使儿童边缘化,而且使赤字观点永久化。本研究探讨了基于探究的环境如何增强代理素养。我们使用案例研究的方法来检查儿童的识字实践和他们对社会正义概念的参与。数据来源包括教师创建的带有儿童工作样本和对话的故事板、计划会议的记录和研究人员日志。数据分析使用逐行编码的转录,故事板对话,和研究人员的日志。采用目视分析方法对儿童作品样本进行调查。研究结果表明,孩子们在整个决策过程中都积极参与,从被动的学习者到倡导者,最终到活动家。两个小插曲提供了项目的叙事快照,展示了儿童的自主识字实践,以及儿童的好奇如何以有意义的方式推动围绕社会正义问题的讨论和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empowering agentic literacies: A case study on advocacy and activism in a preschool classroom
The fundamental right of every child to access books and materials with diverse perspectives is recognized globally. This right not only supports cognitive and academic development but also contributes significantly to social and emotional well-being, fostering active participation in society. However, integrating social justice topics into early childhood education remains a challenge. This article argues that failing to address these topics not only marginalizes children but also perpetuates a deficit perspective. This study explores how an inquiry-based environment empowers agentic literacies. We used a case study approach to examine children’s literacy practices and their engagement with social justice concepts. Data sources include teacher-created storyboards with children’s work samples and dialog, transcripts from planning meetings, and a researcher journal. Data were analyzed using line-by-line coding for transcripts, storyboard dialog, and the researcher’s journal. Visual analysis was used to investigate children’s work samples. The findings illustrate a progression from agentic learners to advocates and eventually activists, with children actively participating in decision-making processes throughout. Two vignettes offer narrative snapshots of the project, demonstrating children’s agentic literacy practices and how children’s wonderings drove discussions and actions around social justice issues in a contextualized meaningful way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Journal of Early Childhood Literacy is a fully peer-reviewed international journal. Since its foundation in 2001 JECL has rapidly become a distinctive, leading voice in research in early childhood literacy, with a multinational range of contributors and readership. The main emphasis in the journal is on papers researching issues related to the nature, function and use of literacy in early childhood. This includes the history, development, use, learning and teaching of literacy, as well as policy and strategy. Research papers may address theoretical, methodological, strategic or applied aspects of early childhood literacy and could be reviews of research issues. JECL is both a forum for debate about the topic of early childhood literacy and a resource for those working in the field. Literacy is broadly defined; JECL focuses on the 0-8 age range. Our prime interest in empirical work is those studies that are situated in authentic or naturalistic settings; this differentiates the journal from others in the area. JECL, therefore, tends to favour qualitative work but is also open to research employing quantitative methods. The journal is multi-disciplinary. We welcome submissions from diverse disciplinary backgrounds including: education, cultural psychology, literacy studies, sociology, anthropology, historical and cultural studies, applied linguistics and semiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信