退伍军人接受老年友好型医疗系统4M护理的住院后结果

IF 4.5
Thomas A Bayer, Malisa Barber, Christopher Halladay, Mazhgan Rowneki, Heather Davila, Michelle Mengeling, Scotte Hartronft, James L Rudolph, Kaleen N Hayes
{"title":"退伍军人接受老年友好型医疗系统4M护理的住院后结果","authors":"Thomas A Bayer, Malisa Barber, Christopher Halladay, Mazhgan Rowneki, Heather Davila, Michelle Mengeling, Scotte Hartronft, James L Rudolph, Kaleen N Hayes","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Age-Friendly Health System movement has been building teams and systems to implement the assessment of the \"4Ms\" (What Matters, Medications, Mobility, and Mentation). Although each of the 4Ms is an evidence-based practice, the reporting of outcomes for people who receive the assessment of all 4Ms has been limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective matched cohort study included Veterans admitted to six VA medical centers implementing inpatient assessment of the 4Ms from January 2022 to December 2024. Using electronic health records, we identified a cohort of Veterans admitted to inpatient wards and with documented assessment of the 4Ms. Propensity score matching was used to select a matched cohort without complete 4M assessments. The matching algorithm required matching on facility, admission quarter, and year in addition to a propensity score based on covariates including demographics and comorbidities. We selected the AFHS outcomes of 30-day readmission, emergency department use, and mortality. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate cumulative incidence of outcomes and Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The propensity matching analysis resulted in 2420 Veterans with 4Ms care and 4688 matched Veterans without (mean age 79 years, 97% male). The matched groups were well balanced. AFHS care with the 4Ms was associated with reduced hazard for readmission (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.73) and statistically similar hazard for ED visits in 30 days (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.13) and mortality (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.21). Results were similar when restricting to those with dementia and excluding those with any of the 4Ms assessments in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, AFHS care including assessment of the 4Ms was associated with reduced readmission without changes in emergency department visits or mortality. The results support the effort of implementing AFHS evidence-based practices into inpatient care sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Hospitalization Outcomes for Veterans Receiving Age-Friendly Health Systems 4M Care.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Bayer, Malisa Barber, Christopher Halladay, Mazhgan Rowneki, Heather Davila, Michelle Mengeling, Scotte Hartronft, James L Rudolph, Kaleen N Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.70156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Age-Friendly Health System movement has been building teams and systems to implement the assessment of the \\\"4Ms\\\" (What Matters, Medications, Mobility, and Mentation). Although each of the 4Ms is an evidence-based practice, the reporting of outcomes for people who receive the assessment of all 4Ms has been limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective matched cohort study included Veterans admitted to six VA medical centers implementing inpatient assessment of the 4Ms from January 2022 to December 2024. Using electronic health records, we identified a cohort of Veterans admitted to inpatient wards and with documented assessment of the 4Ms. Propensity score matching was used to select a matched cohort without complete 4M assessments. The matching algorithm required matching on facility, admission quarter, and year in addition to a propensity score based on covariates including demographics and comorbidities. We selected the AFHS outcomes of 30-day readmission, emergency department use, and mortality. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate cumulative incidence of outcomes and Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The propensity matching analysis resulted in 2420 Veterans with 4Ms care and 4688 matched Veterans without (mean age 79 years, 97% male). The matched groups were well balanced. AFHS care with the 4Ms was associated with reduced hazard for readmission (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.73) and statistically similar hazard for ED visits in 30 days (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.13) and mortality (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.21). Results were similar when restricting to those with dementia and excluding those with any of the 4Ms assessments in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, AFHS care including assessment of the 4Ms was associated with reduced readmission without changes in emergency department visits or mortality. The results support the effort of implementing AFHS evidence-based practices into inpatient care sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人友好型卫生系统运动一直在建立团队和系统来实施“4Ms”(重要的是什么,药物,流动性和心理状态)的评估。虽然每一个4m都是基于证据的实践,但对接受所有4m评估的人的结果报告是有限的。方法:这项回顾性匹配队列研究纳入了从2022年1月到2024年12月在6个VA医疗中心对4Ms进行住院评估的退伍军人。使用电子健康记录,我们确定了一组住院病房的退伍军人,并记录了4Ms的评估。倾向评分匹配用于选择匹配的队列,没有完整的4M评估。匹配算法需要匹配设施、入院季度和年份,以及基于人口统计学和合并症等协变量的倾向评分。我们选择了30天再入院、急诊科使用和死亡率的AFHS结果。我们使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计结果的累积发生率,使用Cox比例风险模型估计风险比。结果:倾向匹配分析结果显示,有4Ms护理的退伍军人2420人,没有4Ms护理的退伍军人4688人(平均年龄79岁,97%为男性)。配对组的平衡很好。AFHS护理与4Ms的再入院风险降低相关(HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.73), 30天急诊科就诊风险(HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.13)和死亡率相似(HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.21)。当限制痴呆患者并排除对照组中具有4Ms评估中的任何一种的患者时,结果相似。结论:在这项回顾性队列研究中,包括4Ms评估在内的AFHS护理与减少再入院有关,而急诊就诊或死亡率没有变化。结果支持在住院护理场所实施AFHS循证实践的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-Hospitalization Outcomes for Veterans Receiving Age-Friendly Health Systems 4M Care.

Background: The Age-Friendly Health System movement has been building teams and systems to implement the assessment of the "4Ms" (What Matters, Medications, Mobility, and Mentation). Although each of the 4Ms is an evidence-based practice, the reporting of outcomes for people who receive the assessment of all 4Ms has been limited.

Methods: This retrospective matched cohort study included Veterans admitted to six VA medical centers implementing inpatient assessment of the 4Ms from January 2022 to December 2024. Using electronic health records, we identified a cohort of Veterans admitted to inpatient wards and with documented assessment of the 4Ms. Propensity score matching was used to select a matched cohort without complete 4M assessments. The matching algorithm required matching on facility, admission quarter, and year in addition to a propensity score based on covariates including demographics and comorbidities. We selected the AFHS outcomes of 30-day readmission, emergency department use, and mortality. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate cumulative incidence of outcomes and Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios.

Results: The propensity matching analysis resulted in 2420 Veterans with 4Ms care and 4688 matched Veterans without (mean age 79 years, 97% male). The matched groups were well balanced. AFHS care with the 4Ms was associated with reduced hazard for readmission (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.73) and statistically similar hazard for ED visits in 30 days (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.13) and mortality (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.21). Results were similar when restricting to those with dementia and excluding those with any of the 4Ms assessments in the control group.

Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, AFHS care including assessment of the 4Ms was associated with reduced readmission without changes in emergency department visits or mortality. The results support the effort of implementing AFHS evidence-based practices into inpatient care sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信