Emily K Short, Phuong Y Duong, Jennifer Tjia, Matthew Alcusky, Mary Lynn McPherson, Jon P Furuno
{"title":"临终关怀住院患者接受抗血栓治疗处方的患病率及相关因素。","authors":"Emily K Short, Phuong Y Duong, Jennifer Tjia, Matthew Alcusky, Mary Lynn McPherson, Jon P Furuno","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known regarding antithrombotic prescribing in U.S. hospice patients. We quantified the prevalence and predictors of receiving an antithrombotic prescription on hospice admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study using electronic health record data from adult (age ≥ 18 years) decedents of a large, for-profit hospice chain who died between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Our primary outcome was having a prescription for antithrombotic (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) therapy on hospice admission. We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 54,643 hospice decedents, the mean age was 79.7 (standard deviation (SD) 13.2) years, 44.6% were male, and 57.0% were White. The median hospice length of stay was 9 (interquartile range 3-40) days, and 18,531 patients (33.9%) had a Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) score of 30%. Overall, 11,360 patients (20.8%) had at least one antithrombotic prescription on hospice admission. The most frequently prescribed antithrombotic classes were antiplatelets (15.7%) and direct oral anticoagulants (3.7%). Patients with PPS scores of 20%-30% (adjusted OR (aOR) 9.38, 95% CI 8.03-10.95), 40%-50% (aOR 15.69, 95% CI 13.38-18.40), and 60%-100% (aOR 15.67, 95% CI 12.41-19.79) were significantly more likely to receive an antithrombotic prescription compared to patients with a PPS score < 20%. Additionally, patients receiving care in an assisted living facility (aOR 4.34, 95% CI 3.86-4.87), nursing home (aOR 4.02, 95% CI 3.62-4.47), or at home (aOR 4.08, 95% CI 3.74-4.45) were more likely to receive an antithrombotic prescription compared to patients receiving care in an inpatient hospice setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antithrombotic therapy was prevalent on hospice admission and most associated with better patient prognosis and non-inpatient hospice care locations. More research is needed to optimize antithrombotic prescribing in hospice care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Factors Associated With Receiving a Prescription for Antithrombotic Therapy on Hospice Admission.\",\"authors\":\"Emily K Short, Phuong Y Duong, Jennifer Tjia, Matthew Alcusky, Mary Lynn McPherson, Jon P Furuno\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.70170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known regarding antithrombotic prescribing in U.S. hospice patients. We quantified the prevalence and predictors of receiving an antithrombotic prescription on hospice admission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study using electronic health record data from adult (age ≥ 18 years) decedents of a large, for-profit hospice chain who died between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Our primary outcome was having a prescription for antithrombotic (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) therapy on hospice admission. We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 54,643 hospice decedents, the mean age was 79.7 (standard deviation (SD) 13.2) years, 44.6% were male, and 57.0% were White. The median hospice length of stay was 9 (interquartile range 3-40) days, and 18,531 patients (33.9%) had a Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) score of 30%. Overall, 11,360 patients (20.8%) had at least one antithrombotic prescription on hospice admission. The most frequently prescribed antithrombotic classes were antiplatelets (15.7%) and direct oral anticoagulants (3.7%). Patients with PPS scores of 20%-30% (adjusted OR (aOR) 9.38, 95% CI 8.03-10.95), 40%-50% (aOR 15.69, 95% CI 13.38-18.40), and 60%-100% (aOR 15.67, 95% CI 12.41-19.79) were significantly more likely to receive an antithrombotic prescription compared to patients with a PPS score < 20%. Additionally, patients receiving care in an assisted living facility (aOR 4.34, 95% CI 3.86-4.87), nursing home (aOR 4.02, 95% CI 3.62-4.47), or at home (aOR 4.08, 95% CI 3.74-4.45) were more likely to receive an antithrombotic prescription compared to patients receiving care in an inpatient hospice setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antithrombotic therapy was prevalent on hospice admission and most associated with better patient prognosis and non-inpatient hospice care locations. More research is needed to optimize antithrombotic prescribing in hospice care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于美国临终关怀病人的抗血栓处方知之甚少。我们量化了临终关怀入院时接受抗血栓处方的患病率和预测因素。方法:这是一项横断面研究,使用了2017年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间死亡的大型营利性临终关怀连锁机构成年(年龄≥18岁)死者的电子健康记录数据。我们的主要结局是在临终关怀入院时获得抗血栓(抗凝或抗血小板)治疗的处方。我们使用多变量逻辑回归计算校正优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:54,643名临终关怀死者中,平均年龄为79.7(标准差13.2)岁,男性占44.6%,白人占57.0%。安宁疗护住院时间中位数为9天(四分位数间距为3-40),18531名患者(33.9%)的安宁疗护表现量表(PPS)得分为30%。总体而言,11,360名患者(20.8%)在临终关怀入院时至少有一种抗血栓处方。最常用的抗血栓药物是抗血小板(15.7%)和直接口服抗凝剂(3.7%)。与PPS评分的患者相比,PPS评分为20%-30%(调整后OR (aOR) 9.38, 95% CI 8.03-10.95)、40%-50% (aOR 15.69, 95% CI 13.38-18.40)和60%-100% (aOR 15.67, 95% CI 12.41-19.79)的患者接受抗栓处方的可能性显著高于PPS评分的患者。结论:抗栓治疗在临终关怀住院患者中普遍存在,且与更好的患者预后和非住院临终关怀地点相关。需要更多的研究来优化临终关怀中的抗血栓处方。
Prevalence and Factors Associated With Receiving a Prescription for Antithrombotic Therapy on Hospice Admission.
Background: Little is known regarding antithrombotic prescribing in U.S. hospice patients. We quantified the prevalence and predictors of receiving an antithrombotic prescription on hospice admission.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using electronic health record data from adult (age ≥ 18 years) decedents of a large, for-profit hospice chain who died between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Our primary outcome was having a prescription for antithrombotic (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) therapy on hospice admission. We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Among 54,643 hospice decedents, the mean age was 79.7 (standard deviation (SD) 13.2) years, 44.6% were male, and 57.0% were White. The median hospice length of stay was 9 (interquartile range 3-40) days, and 18,531 patients (33.9%) had a Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) score of 30%. Overall, 11,360 patients (20.8%) had at least one antithrombotic prescription on hospice admission. The most frequently prescribed antithrombotic classes were antiplatelets (15.7%) and direct oral anticoagulants (3.7%). Patients with PPS scores of 20%-30% (adjusted OR (aOR) 9.38, 95% CI 8.03-10.95), 40%-50% (aOR 15.69, 95% CI 13.38-18.40), and 60%-100% (aOR 15.67, 95% CI 12.41-19.79) were significantly more likely to receive an antithrombotic prescription compared to patients with a PPS score < 20%. Additionally, patients receiving care in an assisted living facility (aOR 4.34, 95% CI 3.86-4.87), nursing home (aOR 4.02, 95% CI 3.62-4.47), or at home (aOR 4.08, 95% CI 3.74-4.45) were more likely to receive an antithrombotic prescription compared to patients receiving care in an inpatient hospice setting.
Conclusions: Antithrombotic therapy was prevalent on hospice admission and most associated with better patient prognosis and non-inpatient hospice care locations. More research is needed to optimize antithrombotic prescribing in hospice care.