“得到一半的回报是加倍的好”:少数族裔的回报减少。

Journal of biomedical and life sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.31586/jbls.2025.1158
Shervin Assari, John Ashley Pallera, Hossein Zare
{"title":"“得到一半的回报是加倍的好”:少数族裔的回报减少。","authors":"Shervin Assari, John Ashley Pallera, Hossein Zare","doi":"10.31586/jbls.2025.1158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"To Be Twice as Good to Get Half\" is a common mindset among high aspiration and ambition Black individuals in the U.S., capturing the lived reality of Minorities' Diminished Returns (MDRs). This paper explains that MDRs reflect how, even with high levels of ambition, self-efficacy, education, and income, Black individuals and other marginalized groups do not experience the same protective benefits for health and well-being as White populations. Systemic obstacles embedded within U.S. society weaken the expected returns on socioeconomic achievements for racialized individuals, creating a reality where \"being twice as good\" still results in lesser outcomes. High-SES Black individuals, for instance, continue to face significant risks for adverse outcomes, such as depression and chronic disease, due to structural inequities across domains like labor market discrimination, segregation, and accumulated disadvantage from childhood. Our analysis identifies key mechanisms-including interpersonal discrimination, lower-quality education, and structural racism in sectors like banking, policing, and real estate-that erode the protective effects of SES across racial lines. Mediating factors, such as chronic stress, allostatic load, and epigenetic changes over the life course, further compound these diminished returns, weakening the expected physical and mental health benefits. Drawing on extensive evidence from U.S. national and local datasets and corroborated by international studies, this paper underscores the necessity of policies that dismantle structural barriers rather than relying solely on SES improvements. Recommendations include implementing multi-sectoral policies, recognizing the unique challenges of middle-class non-White populations, and approaching policy with humility, acknowledging that achieving equity is a long-term endeavor. By challenging the \"bootstraps\" narrative, this paper advocates for structural interventions aimed at genuine health and economic equity for all racial and socioeconomic groups. While we provide an in-depth analysis of MDRs' phenomena, mechanisms, mediators, and policy implications, the experience is often distilled as, \"I have to be twice as good to get half.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":520003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical and life sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"67-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12526249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"To Be Twice as Good to Get Half\\\": Minorities' Diminished Returns.\",\"authors\":\"Shervin Assari, John Ashley Pallera, Hossein Zare\",\"doi\":\"10.31586/jbls.2025.1158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>\\\"To Be Twice as Good to Get Half\\\" is a common mindset among high aspiration and ambition Black individuals in the U.S., capturing the lived reality of Minorities' Diminished Returns (MDRs). This paper explains that MDRs reflect how, even with high levels of ambition, self-efficacy, education, and income, Black individuals and other marginalized groups do not experience the same protective benefits for health and well-being as White populations. Systemic obstacles embedded within U.S. society weaken the expected returns on socioeconomic achievements for racialized individuals, creating a reality where \\\"being twice as good\\\" still results in lesser outcomes. High-SES Black individuals, for instance, continue to face significant risks for adverse outcomes, such as depression and chronic disease, due to structural inequities across domains like labor market discrimination, segregation, and accumulated disadvantage from childhood. Our analysis identifies key mechanisms-including interpersonal discrimination, lower-quality education, and structural racism in sectors like banking, policing, and real estate-that erode the protective effects of SES across racial lines. Mediating factors, such as chronic stress, allostatic load, and epigenetic changes over the life course, further compound these diminished returns, weakening the expected physical and mental health benefits. Drawing on extensive evidence from U.S. national and local datasets and corroborated by international studies, this paper underscores the necessity of policies that dismantle structural barriers rather than relying solely on SES improvements. Recommendations include implementing multi-sectoral policies, recognizing the unique challenges of middle-class non-White populations, and approaching policy with humility, acknowledging that achieving equity is a long-term endeavor. By challenging the \\\"bootstraps\\\" narrative, this paper advocates for structural interventions aimed at genuine health and economic equity for all racial and socioeconomic groups. While we provide an in-depth analysis of MDRs' phenomena, mechanisms, mediators, and policy implications, the experience is often distilled as, \\\"I have to be twice as good to get half.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical and life sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"67-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12526249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical and life sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31586/jbls.2025.1158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical and life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31586/jbls.2025.1158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“得到一半就比自己好两倍”是美国有远大抱负的黑人的普遍心态,反映了少数族裔收益递减(mdr)的现实。这篇论文解释说,mdr反映出,即使有很高的抱负、自我效能感、教育和收入,黑人和其他边缘化群体在健康和福祉方面也没有像白人那样得到同样的保护。美国社会中根深蒂固的系统性障碍削弱了种族化个人在社会经济成就上的预期回报,造成了一种现实,即“两倍好”仍然导致较少的结果。例如,由于劳动力市场歧视、隔离和童年积累的不利条件等领域的结构性不平等,高ses的黑人个体继续面临抑郁和慢性病等不良后果的重大风险。我们的分析确定了关键的机制,包括人际歧视、低质量的教育以及银行、警察和房地产等部门的结构性种族主义,这些都削弱了跨种族SES的保护作用。慢性压力、适应负荷和生命过程中的表观遗传变化等中介因素进一步加剧了这些减少的回报,削弱了预期的身心健康益处。本文利用来自美国国家和地方数据集的大量证据,并得到国际研究的证实,强调了消除结构性障碍的政策的必要性,而不是仅仅依靠社会经济地位的改善。建议包括实施多部门政策,认识到非白人中产阶级面临的独特挑战,以谦逊的态度对待政策,认识到实现公平是一项长期的努力。通过挑战“自力更生”的叙述,本文主张进行结构性干预,旨在为所有种族和社会经济群体实现真正的健康和经济平等。虽然我们对mdr的现象、机制、中介因素和政策影响进行了深入分析,但经验往往被提炼为“我必须加倍努力才能得到一半”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"To Be Twice as Good to Get Half": Minorities' Diminished Returns.

"To Be Twice as Good to Get Half" is a common mindset among high aspiration and ambition Black individuals in the U.S., capturing the lived reality of Minorities' Diminished Returns (MDRs). This paper explains that MDRs reflect how, even with high levels of ambition, self-efficacy, education, and income, Black individuals and other marginalized groups do not experience the same protective benefits for health and well-being as White populations. Systemic obstacles embedded within U.S. society weaken the expected returns on socioeconomic achievements for racialized individuals, creating a reality where "being twice as good" still results in lesser outcomes. High-SES Black individuals, for instance, continue to face significant risks for adverse outcomes, such as depression and chronic disease, due to structural inequities across domains like labor market discrimination, segregation, and accumulated disadvantage from childhood. Our analysis identifies key mechanisms-including interpersonal discrimination, lower-quality education, and structural racism in sectors like banking, policing, and real estate-that erode the protective effects of SES across racial lines. Mediating factors, such as chronic stress, allostatic load, and epigenetic changes over the life course, further compound these diminished returns, weakening the expected physical and mental health benefits. Drawing on extensive evidence from U.S. national and local datasets and corroborated by international studies, this paper underscores the necessity of policies that dismantle structural barriers rather than relying solely on SES improvements. Recommendations include implementing multi-sectoral policies, recognizing the unique challenges of middle-class non-White populations, and approaching policy with humility, acknowledging that achieving equity is a long-term endeavor. By challenging the "bootstraps" narrative, this paper advocates for structural interventions aimed at genuine health and economic equity for all racial and socioeconomic groups. While we provide an in-depth analysis of MDRs' phenomena, mechanisms, mediators, and policy implications, the experience is often distilled as, "I have to be twice as good to get half."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信