个人防护装备之下:急诊科医护人员对感染预防与控制的看法。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Laya Dasari, Eileen F Searle, Julio Ma Shum, Samantha L Pellicane, Amy Courtney, Molly L Paras, Erica S Shenoy, Paul D Biddinger
{"title":"个人防护装备之下:急诊科医护人员对感染预防与控制的看法。","authors":"Laya Dasari, Eileen F Searle, Julio Ma Shum, Samantha L Pellicane, Amy Courtney, Molly L Paras, Erica S Shenoy, Paul D Biddinger","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimally following infection prevention and control practices in the emergency department can be challenging owing to patient crowding, high acuity of illness, and the presentation of patients with a wide range of undifferentiated illnesses, among other factors. Understanding how health care personnel in the emergency department perceive infection prevention and control challenges may help inform improvements in infection prevention and control practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August and November 2023, interviews focused on infection prevention and control were conducted with ED health care personnel. Sites were identified using a convenience sample from a larger group of United States emergency departments selected for variety in geography, volume, and practice type. Interviews solicited voluntary participation from health care personnel and were recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 raters. Codes were categorized as either facilitators or barriers to effective infection prevention and control practice. Content analysis was used to quantify the frequency of the identified codes, and responses were stratified by role group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 interviews across 4 role groups and 9 facilities were conducted. Barriers identified to effective infection prevention and control practice included constraints on time (25 of 25; 100%), attention (23 of 25; 92%), and environment of care (23 of 25; 92%), as well as perceptions of infection prevention and control importance, including risk (23 of 25; 92%). Promoters included culture supporting infection prevention and control (24 of 25; 96%) and interpersonal dynamics (23 of 25; 92%). Stratified analyses demonstrated variations among roles, with nursing and nonclinical health care personnel emphasizing communication concerns, whereas providers emphasized competing priorities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The main barriers to effective infection prevention and control perceived by ED health care personnel included limited time and personal perceptions of risk and safety. A strong culture that promotes infection prevention and control practices and cohesive team dynamics were the primary infection prevention and control facilitators reported, suggesting potential targets for future interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beneath the Personal Protective Equipment: Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control From Emergency Department Health Care Personnel.\",\"authors\":\"Laya Dasari, Eileen F Searle, Julio Ma Shum, Samantha L Pellicane, Amy Courtney, Molly L Paras, Erica S Shenoy, Paul D Biddinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2025.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimally following infection prevention and control practices in the emergency department can be challenging owing to patient crowding, high acuity of illness, and the presentation of patients with a wide range of undifferentiated illnesses, among other factors. Understanding how health care personnel in the emergency department perceive infection prevention and control challenges may help inform improvements in infection prevention and control practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August and November 2023, interviews focused on infection prevention and control were conducted with ED health care personnel. Sites were identified using a convenience sample from a larger group of United States emergency departments selected for variety in geography, volume, and practice type. Interviews solicited voluntary participation from health care personnel and were recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 raters. Codes were categorized as either facilitators or barriers to effective infection prevention and control practice. Content analysis was used to quantify the frequency of the identified codes, and responses were stratified by role group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 interviews across 4 role groups and 9 facilities were conducted. Barriers identified to effective infection prevention and control practice included constraints on time (25 of 25; 100%), attention (23 of 25; 92%), and environment of care (23 of 25; 92%), as well as perceptions of infection prevention and control importance, including risk (23 of 25; 92%). Promoters included culture supporting infection prevention and control (24 of 25; 96%) and interpersonal dynamics (23 of 25; 92%). Stratified analyses demonstrated variations among roles, with nursing and nonclinical health care personnel emphasizing communication concerns, whereas providers emphasized competing priorities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The main barriers to effective infection prevention and control perceived by ED health care personnel included limited time and personal perceptions of risk and safety. A strong culture that promotes infection prevention and control practices and cohesive team dynamics were the primary infection prevention and control facilitators reported, suggesting potential targets for future interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.09.007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.09.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于患者拥挤,疾病的高敏度,以及患者患有各种未分化疾病等因素,在急诊科最佳地遵循感染预防和控制实践可能具有挑战性。了解急诊科的卫生保健人员如何看待感染预防和控制的挑战,可能有助于告知感染预防和控制实践的改进。方法:于2023年8月至11月对急诊科医护人员进行感染防控访谈。根据地理位置、数量和实践类型的不同,从美国急诊部门的更大群体中选择方便的样本来确定地点。访谈要求卫生保健人员自愿参与,并由2名评分员进行记录、转录和编码。守则被归类为有效感染预防和控制实践的促进者或障碍。内容分析用于量化识别代码的频率,并根据角色组对响应进行分层。结果:共进行了4个角色组和9个机构的25次访谈。确定的有效感染预防和控制措施的障碍包括时间限制(25人中有25人,100%)、注意力限制(25人中有23人,92%)和护理环境限制(25人中有23人,92%),以及对感染预防和控制重要性的认识,包括风险限制(25人中有23人,92%)。促进因素包括支持感染预防和控制的文化(25人中有24人,96%)和人际动力学(25人中有23人,92%)。分层分析显示了角色之间的差异,护理和非临床卫生保健人员强调沟通问题,而提供者强调竞争优先事项。讨论:急诊科医护人员认为有效预防和控制感染的主要障碍包括时间有限和个人对风险和安全的认识。据报道,促进感染预防和控制实践的强大文化和有凝聚力的团队动力是主要的感染预防和控制促进因素,这表明了未来干预措施的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beneath the Personal Protective Equipment: Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control From Emergency Department Health Care Personnel.

Introduction: Optimally following infection prevention and control practices in the emergency department can be challenging owing to patient crowding, high acuity of illness, and the presentation of patients with a wide range of undifferentiated illnesses, among other factors. Understanding how health care personnel in the emergency department perceive infection prevention and control challenges may help inform improvements in infection prevention and control practices.

Methods: Between August and November 2023, interviews focused on infection prevention and control were conducted with ED health care personnel. Sites were identified using a convenience sample from a larger group of United States emergency departments selected for variety in geography, volume, and practice type. Interviews solicited voluntary participation from health care personnel and were recorded, transcribed, and coded by 2 raters. Codes were categorized as either facilitators or barriers to effective infection prevention and control practice. Content analysis was used to quantify the frequency of the identified codes, and responses were stratified by role group.

Results: A total of 25 interviews across 4 role groups and 9 facilities were conducted. Barriers identified to effective infection prevention and control practice included constraints on time (25 of 25; 100%), attention (23 of 25; 92%), and environment of care (23 of 25; 92%), as well as perceptions of infection prevention and control importance, including risk (23 of 25; 92%). Promoters included culture supporting infection prevention and control (24 of 25; 96%) and interpersonal dynamics (23 of 25; 92%). Stratified analyses demonstrated variations among roles, with nursing and nonclinical health care personnel emphasizing communication concerns, whereas providers emphasized competing priorities.

Discussion: The main barriers to effective infection prevention and control perceived by ED health care personnel included limited time and personal perceptions of risk and safety. A strong culture that promotes infection prevention and control practices and cohesive team dynamics were the primary infection prevention and control facilitators reported, suggesting potential targets for future interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信