日本已批准抗体药物免疫原性的临床影响:药代动力学、疗效和安全性结果的定量评估。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Masaki Saito, Yumiko Urakami-Takebayashi, Hideyuki Motohashi, Junya Nagai
{"title":"日本已批准抗体药物免疫原性的临床影响:药代动力学、疗效和安全性结果的定量评估。","authors":"Masaki Saito, Yumiko Urakami-Takebayashi, Hideyuki Motohashi, Junya Nagai","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01165-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunogenicity, commonly manifested through the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), is a critical concern for therapeutic antibodies as it can adversely affect pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety. Although ADA-related impacts have been closely evaluated for individual antibody drugs, cross-product analyses of approved antibody drugs remain limited. In this study, we examined 92 antibody therapeutics approved by the Japanese regulatory authority as of March 2024, focusing on their review reports and prescribing information, to quantitatively assess the actual clinical impacts of ADA. Among these drugs, ADA-related decreased drug exposure, reduced efficacy, and worsened safety were indicated in the prescribing information of 18.5%, 10.9%, and 5.4%, respectively. Interestingly, ADA-related descriptions of both decreased drug exposure and reduced efficacy were observed in significantly lower proportions among oncology drugs than among non-oncology drugs. Furthermore, humanized antibodies exhibited higher proportions of ADA-related impacts than human antibodies; in particular, decreased exposure was significantly more common with humanized antibodies (27.7%) than with human antibodies (8.6%), supporting the concept that human antibodies have lower immunogenic potential. In addition, our evaluation of review reports indicated that all drugs with ADA-related reduced efficacy had decreased exposure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitatively evaluate the clinical impact of immunogenicity in approved antibody therapeutics in Japan. These results are expected to inform the appropriate clinical use of antibody therapeutics and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of immunogenicity risk assessments during clinical development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Impacts of Immunogenicity in Approved Antibody Drugs in Japan: A Quantitative Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Saito, Yumiko Urakami-Takebayashi, Hideyuki Motohashi, Junya Nagai\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-025-01165-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immunogenicity, commonly manifested through the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), is a critical concern for therapeutic antibodies as it can adversely affect pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety. Although ADA-related impacts have been closely evaluated for individual antibody drugs, cross-product analyses of approved antibody drugs remain limited. In this study, we examined 92 antibody therapeutics approved by the Japanese regulatory authority as of March 2024, focusing on their review reports and prescribing information, to quantitatively assess the actual clinical impacts of ADA. Among these drugs, ADA-related decreased drug exposure, reduced efficacy, and worsened safety were indicated in the prescribing information of 18.5%, 10.9%, and 5.4%, respectively. Interestingly, ADA-related descriptions of both decreased drug exposure and reduced efficacy were observed in significantly lower proportions among oncology drugs than among non-oncology drugs. Furthermore, humanized antibodies exhibited higher proportions of ADA-related impacts than human antibodies; in particular, decreased exposure was significantly more common with humanized antibodies (27.7%) than with human antibodies (8.6%), supporting the concept that human antibodies have lower immunogenic potential. In addition, our evaluation of review reports indicated that all drugs with ADA-related reduced efficacy had decreased exposure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitatively evaluate the clinical impact of immunogenicity in approved antibody therapeutics in Japan. These results are expected to inform the appropriate clinical use of antibody therapeutics and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of immunogenicity risk assessments during clinical development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01165-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01165-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫原性,通常通过抗药物抗体(ADAs)的发展表现出来,是治疗性抗体的一个关键问题,因为它会对药代动力学(PK)、疗效和安全性产生不利影响。尽管已对单个抗体药物进行了与ada相关的密切评估,但已批准的抗体药物的跨产品分析仍然有限。在本研究中,我们审查了截至2024年3月日本监管机构批准的92种抗体疗法,重点关注其审查报告和处方信息,定量评估ADA的实际临床影响。在这些药物中,处方信息中显示与ada相关的药物暴露减少、疗效降低和安全性恶化的比例分别为18.5%、10.9%和5.4%。有趣的是,与非肿瘤药物相比,肿瘤药物中与ada相关的药物暴露减少和疗效降低的描述比例明显较低。此外,人源化抗体比人源化抗体表现出更高比例的ada相关影响;特别是,人源化抗体(27.7%)明显比人源化抗体(8.6%)更常见,这支持了人源化抗体具有较低免疫原性潜力的概念。此外,我们对综述报告的评价表明,所有与ada相关的疗效降低的药物都减少了暴露。据我们所知,这是日本第一个定量评估免疫原性在已批准抗体治疗中的临床影响的研究。这些结果有望为适当的临床使用抗体疗法提供信息,并有助于在临床开发过程中更全面地了解免疫原性风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Impacts of Immunogenicity in Approved Antibody Drugs in Japan: A Quantitative Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes.

Immunogenicity, commonly manifested through the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), is a critical concern for therapeutic antibodies as it can adversely affect pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety. Although ADA-related impacts have been closely evaluated for individual antibody drugs, cross-product analyses of approved antibody drugs remain limited. In this study, we examined 92 antibody therapeutics approved by the Japanese regulatory authority as of March 2024, focusing on their review reports and prescribing information, to quantitatively assess the actual clinical impacts of ADA. Among these drugs, ADA-related decreased drug exposure, reduced efficacy, and worsened safety were indicated in the prescribing information of 18.5%, 10.9%, and 5.4%, respectively. Interestingly, ADA-related descriptions of both decreased drug exposure and reduced efficacy were observed in significantly lower proportions among oncology drugs than among non-oncology drugs. Furthermore, humanized antibodies exhibited higher proportions of ADA-related impacts than human antibodies; in particular, decreased exposure was significantly more common with humanized antibodies (27.7%) than with human antibodies (8.6%), supporting the concept that human antibodies have lower immunogenic potential. In addition, our evaluation of review reports indicated that all drugs with ADA-related reduced efficacy had decreased exposure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitatively evaluate the clinical impact of immunogenicity in approved antibody therapeutics in Japan. These results are expected to inform the appropriate clinical use of antibody therapeutics and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of immunogenicity risk assessments during clinical development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信