重新审视我们自己的职业身份,以推动助产事业向前发展。

IF 1.7 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/201991
Raymonde Gagnon, Céline Lemay
{"title":"重新审视我们自己的职业身份,以推动助产事业向前发展。","authors":"Raymonde Gagnon, Céline Lemay","doi":"10.18332/ejm/201991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The midwife community of Québec, expressed the need to revisit the identity markers of the profession after been integrated for over twenty years into a medical and hospital-centered healthcare system. There was a need to identify meaningful concepts and principles that allow them to practice in coherence with their uniqueness and in continuity with their historical roots.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative research with a cooperative inquiry approach was chosen. A total of 65 midwives from various practice settings met during two days of reflection. Focus groups of parents (15) where added in order to enrich midwives' discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged: the concept of becoming a mother as a process of transformation, the accompaniment of this process, the concept of giving birth, the professional posture, and distinctive aspects from the medical paradigm. Parents emphasized the importance of a family-centered approach, trusting relationship, choices, and continuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A reflective and collective process has allowed to reconnect with the meaning of being a midwife and practicing in coherence with its specificity. Some questions remained in relation to feminism, the spiritual dimension of birth and the community engagement. Moreover, the abundant use of the term 'physiology' for childbirth does not correspond to the richness of practice narratives and obscure the ineffable sacred character of birth. Midwives face the challenge of integration and inter-professionalism without losing parts of their autonomy and their professional voice. It would be appropriate to revisit the basic training program and examine the elements put in place to build and reinforce midwifery professional specific identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting our own professional identity in order to move midwifery forward in coherence.\",\"authors\":\"Raymonde Gagnon, Céline Lemay\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/ejm/201991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The midwife community of Québec, expressed the need to revisit the identity markers of the profession after been integrated for over twenty years into a medical and hospital-centered healthcare system. There was a need to identify meaningful concepts and principles that allow them to practice in coherence with their uniqueness and in continuity with their historical roots.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative research with a cooperative inquiry approach was chosen. A total of 65 midwives from various practice settings met during two days of reflection. Focus groups of parents (15) where added in order to enrich midwives' discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes emerged: the concept of becoming a mother as a process of transformation, the accompaniment of this process, the concept of giving birth, the professional posture, and distinctive aspects from the medical paradigm. Parents emphasized the importance of a family-centered approach, trusting relationship, choices, and continuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A reflective and collective process has allowed to reconnect with the meaning of being a midwife and practicing in coherence with its specificity. Some questions remained in relation to feminism, the spiritual dimension of birth and the community engagement. Moreover, the abundant use of the term 'physiology' for childbirth does not correspond to the richness of practice narratives and obscure the ineffable sacred character of birth. Midwives face the challenge of integration and inter-professionalism without losing parts of their autonomy and their professional voice. It would be appropriate to revisit the basic training program and examine the elements put in place to build and reinforce midwifery professional specific identity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/201991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/201991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:quamexbec的助产士社区表示,在被纳入医疗和以医院为中心的医疗保健系统20多年后,需要重新审视这一职业的身份标志。有必要确定有意义的概念和原则,使它们能够与它们的独特性保持一致,并与它们的历史根源保持连续性。方法:采用合作探究的定性研究方法。在为期两天的反思中,来自不同实践环境的65名助产士会面。为了丰富助产士的讨论,增加了家长焦点小组(15)。结果:出现了五个主题:成为母亲的概念是一个转变的过程,伴随这一过程,分娩的概念,专业姿态,从医学范式的独特方面。家长们强调以家庭为中心的方法、信任关系、选择和连续性的重要性。结论:一个反思和集体的过程使我们能够重新与助产士的意义联系起来,并与助产士的特殊性保持一致。一些问题仍然与女权主义、出生的精神层面和社区参与有关。此外,大量使用“生理学”一词来描述分娩并不符合实践叙事的丰富性,并且模糊了出生不可言喻的神圣特征。助产士在不丧失部分自主权和专业话语权的情况下,面临着整合和跨专业的挑战。应该重新审视基本培训计划,并检查为建立和加强助产专业特定身份而实施的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting our own professional identity in order to move midwifery forward in coherence.

Introduction: The midwife community of Québec, expressed the need to revisit the identity markers of the profession after been integrated for over twenty years into a medical and hospital-centered healthcare system. There was a need to identify meaningful concepts and principles that allow them to practice in coherence with their uniqueness and in continuity with their historical roots.

Methods: Qualitative research with a cooperative inquiry approach was chosen. A total of 65 midwives from various practice settings met during two days of reflection. Focus groups of parents (15) where added in order to enrich midwives' discussions.

Results: Five themes emerged: the concept of becoming a mother as a process of transformation, the accompaniment of this process, the concept of giving birth, the professional posture, and distinctive aspects from the medical paradigm. Parents emphasized the importance of a family-centered approach, trusting relationship, choices, and continuity.

Conclusions: A reflective and collective process has allowed to reconnect with the meaning of being a midwife and practicing in coherence with its specificity. Some questions remained in relation to feminism, the spiritual dimension of birth and the community engagement. Moreover, the abundant use of the term 'physiology' for childbirth does not correspond to the richness of practice narratives and obscure the ineffable sacred character of birth. Midwives face the challenge of integration and inter-professionalism without losing parts of their autonomy and their professional voice. It would be appropriate to revisit the basic training program and examine the elements put in place to build and reinforce midwifery professional specific identity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信