Isabelle Lee, Mihwa Na, Maura Lavelle, Isabella Schember, Marissa A Guttenberg, G Frank Gerberick, Andreas Natsch, Cindy Ryan, Anne Marie Api
{"title":"定量下一代皮肤致敏风险评估-应用基于体外数据的回归模型来估计起点。","authors":"Isabelle Lee, Mihwa Na, Maura Lavelle, Isabella Schember, Marissa A Guttenberg, G Frank Gerberick, Andreas Natsch, Cindy Ryan, Anne Marie Api","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for dermal sensitization is essential for determining safe concentrations of skin sensitizers in consumer products. The fragrance industry developed the QRA2 approach, which uses the No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) as a starting reference dose or point of departure (PoD). Animal alternatives for potency assessment have emerged to calculate quantitative PoDs. One such alternative is in vitro-based regression models. Herein, a framework for incorporating regression models into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) is presented. The framework begins with hazard assessment using in vitro methods (OECD Guideline 497), followed by PoD calculation through regression models, and completed with QRA2. After determining a PoD, uncertainty factors may be considered to derive a new approach methodology NESIL (NAM-NESIL). Case studies are presented with two sensitizers, p-mentha-1,8-dien-7-al (CAS # 2111-75-3) and 3-propylidenephthalide (CAS # 17369-59-4), calculating acceptable exposure levels (AELs) for products like deodorants and bar soaps. Ratios of the AELs to consumer exposure levels (CELs) were then calculated to determine whether the current use is safe. Comparison of QRA based on NAM-NESILs to historically human-derived NESILs supports the reliability of in vitro models. This approach offers a promising alternative for PoD derivation, potentially eliminating the need for animal data or confirmatory human testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105964"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative next generation risk assessment for skin sensitization - application of regression models based on in vitro data to estimate point of departure.\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Lee, Mihwa Na, Maura Lavelle, Isabella Schember, Marissa A Guttenberg, G Frank Gerberick, Andreas Natsch, Cindy Ryan, Anne Marie Api\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for dermal sensitization is essential for determining safe concentrations of skin sensitizers in consumer products. The fragrance industry developed the QRA2 approach, which uses the No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) as a starting reference dose or point of departure (PoD). Animal alternatives for potency assessment have emerged to calculate quantitative PoDs. One such alternative is in vitro-based regression models. Herein, a framework for incorporating regression models into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) is presented. The framework begins with hazard assessment using in vitro methods (OECD Guideline 497), followed by PoD calculation through regression models, and completed with QRA2. After determining a PoD, uncertainty factors may be considered to derive a new approach methodology NESIL (NAM-NESIL). Case studies are presented with two sensitizers, p-mentha-1,8-dien-7-al (CAS # 2111-75-3) and 3-propylidenephthalide (CAS # 17369-59-4), calculating acceptable exposure levels (AELs) for products like deodorants and bar soaps. Ratios of the AELs to consumer exposure levels (CELs) were then calculated to determine whether the current use is safe. Comparison of QRA based on NAM-NESILs to historically human-derived NESILs supports the reliability of in vitro models. This approach offers a promising alternative for PoD derivation, potentially eliminating the need for animal data or confirmatory human testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105964\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative next generation risk assessment for skin sensitization - application of regression models based on in vitro data to estimate point of departure.
Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for dermal sensitization is essential for determining safe concentrations of skin sensitizers in consumer products. The fragrance industry developed the QRA2 approach, which uses the No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) as a starting reference dose or point of departure (PoD). Animal alternatives for potency assessment have emerged to calculate quantitative PoDs. One such alternative is in vitro-based regression models. Herein, a framework for incorporating regression models into next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) is presented. The framework begins with hazard assessment using in vitro methods (OECD Guideline 497), followed by PoD calculation through regression models, and completed with QRA2. After determining a PoD, uncertainty factors may be considered to derive a new approach methodology NESIL (NAM-NESIL). Case studies are presented with two sensitizers, p-mentha-1,8-dien-7-al (CAS # 2111-75-3) and 3-propylidenephthalide (CAS # 17369-59-4), calculating acceptable exposure levels (AELs) for products like deodorants and bar soaps. Ratios of the AELs to consumer exposure levels (CELs) were then calculated to determine whether the current use is safe. Comparison of QRA based on NAM-NESILs to historically human-derived NESILs supports the reliability of in vitro models. This approach offers a promising alternative for PoD derivation, potentially eliminating the need for animal data or confirmatory human testing.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)