血气分析仪与实验室自动分析仪静脉乳酸值的比较:初步研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Aparajita Shashank Kale, Smita Tripathi, Shalu Gupta
{"title":"血气分析仪与实验室自动分析仪静脉乳酸值的比较:初步研究。","authors":"Aparajita Shashank Kale, Smita Tripathi, Shalu Gupta","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_816_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives Lactate can be estimated by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices such as blood gas analysers (BGA) as well as central lab autoanalysers (AA); both have their advantages. Studies have compared lactate and electrolyte values on arterial blood; none used venous samples which are preferred in children. We planned to compare venous lactate by BGA and AA in children admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods Fifty children aged one month to 18 yr admitted in PICU were included in the study after parental consent. Paired venous samples were collected in heparinised syringes for BGA, in fluoride containing vacutainers for AA and were analysed immediately. Results Lactate levels were assessed in 29 male and 21 female children [Median age: 4 yr interquartile range (IQR)=1-10)]. AA reported higher lactate levels but mean difference between two methods (0.34±1.56 mmol/L) was not statistically significant (P= 0.062). The methods showed statistically significant correlation [95% confidence interval (CI), Spearman correlation coefficient (rs)=0.816, P=<0.001]. Bland Altman plot showed 95 per cent of paired values had differences which was within limits of agreement (-2.71, +3.39); differences were more variable above 2 mmol/L. Both devices classified multiple samples into different clinically significant ranges. Interpretation & conclusion Venous lactate by BGA and AA was found comparable, but critical values requiring clinical intervention were not reported similarly by both analysers. Variability between them was higher at higher venous lactate levels (>2 mmol/L) which represent critically ill children. Use of the same analyser, either BGA or AA, is therefore recommended for monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"162 2","pages":"246-251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of venous lactate values on blood gas analyser versus laboratory autoanalyser: A preliminary study.\",\"authors\":\"Aparajita Shashank Kale, Smita Tripathi, Shalu Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/IJMR_816_2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background & objectives Lactate can be estimated by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices such as blood gas analysers (BGA) as well as central lab autoanalysers (AA); both have their advantages. Studies have compared lactate and electrolyte values on arterial blood; none used venous samples which are preferred in children. We planned to compare venous lactate by BGA and AA in children admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods Fifty children aged one month to 18 yr admitted in PICU were included in the study after parental consent. Paired venous samples were collected in heparinised syringes for BGA, in fluoride containing vacutainers for AA and were analysed immediately. Results Lactate levels were assessed in 29 male and 21 female children [Median age: 4 yr interquartile range (IQR)=1-10)]. AA reported higher lactate levels but mean difference between two methods (0.34±1.56 mmol/L) was not statistically significant (P= 0.062). The methods showed statistically significant correlation [95% confidence interval (CI), Spearman correlation coefficient (rs)=0.816, P=<0.001]. Bland Altman plot showed 95 per cent of paired values had differences which was within limits of agreement (-2.71, +3.39); differences were more variable above 2 mmol/L. Both devices classified multiple samples into different clinically significant ranges. Interpretation & conclusion Venous lactate by BGA and AA was found comparable, but critical values requiring clinical intervention were not reported similarly by both analysers. Variability between them was higher at higher venous lactate levels (>2 mmol/L) which represent critically ill children. Use of the same analyser, either BGA or AA, is therefore recommended for monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"162 2\",\"pages\":\"246-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_816_2025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_816_2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳酸盐可以通过即时检测(POCT)设备,如血气分析仪(BGA)和中央实验室自动分析仪(AA)来估计;两者都有各自的优点。研究比较了动脉血中的乳酸和电解质值;没有人使用儿童首选的静脉样本。我们计划比较BGA和AA在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入院儿童的静脉乳酸水平。方法经父母同意,选择PICU收治的1个月~ 18岁儿童50例作为研究对象。用肝素化注射器采集BGA配对静脉样本,用含氟真空容器采集AA配对静脉样本,并立即进行分析。结果29名男性和21名女性儿童的乳酸水平被评估[年龄中位数:4岁四分位数间距(IQR)=1-10]。AA组乳酸水平较高,但两种方法的平均差异(0.34±1.56 mmol/L)无统计学意义(P= 0.062)。两种方法的相关性有统计学意义[95%可信区间(CI), Spearman相关系数(rs)=0.816, P=2 mmol/L],代表危重患儿。因此,建议使用相同的分析仪(BGA或AA)进行监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of venous lactate values on blood gas analyser versus laboratory autoanalyser: A preliminary study.

Background & objectives Lactate can be estimated by point-of-care testing (POCT) devices such as blood gas analysers (BGA) as well as central lab autoanalysers (AA); both have their advantages. Studies have compared lactate and electrolyte values on arterial blood; none used venous samples which are preferred in children. We planned to compare venous lactate by BGA and AA in children admitted to Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Methods Fifty children aged one month to 18 yr admitted in PICU were included in the study after parental consent. Paired venous samples were collected in heparinised syringes for BGA, in fluoride containing vacutainers for AA and were analysed immediately. Results Lactate levels were assessed in 29 male and 21 female children [Median age: 4 yr interquartile range (IQR)=1-10)]. AA reported higher lactate levels but mean difference between two methods (0.34±1.56 mmol/L) was not statistically significant (P= 0.062). The methods showed statistically significant correlation [95% confidence interval (CI), Spearman correlation coefficient (rs)=0.816, P=<0.001]. Bland Altman plot showed 95 per cent of paired values had differences which was within limits of agreement (-2.71, +3.39); differences were more variable above 2 mmol/L. Both devices classified multiple samples into different clinically significant ranges. Interpretation & conclusion Venous lactate by BGA and AA was found comparable, but critical values requiring clinical intervention were not reported similarly by both analysers. Variability between them was higher at higher venous lactate levels (>2 mmol/L) which represent critically ill children. Use of the same analyser, either BGA or AA, is therefore recommended for monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信